Where in The Constitution are the unborn or their rights even mentioned?

[Grokmaster]

So a 21st century society really interpret its Constitution by the standards of 1787 — an era before the introduction of semi-automatic weaponry, steam power, penicillin, automobiles, trains, electric lights, indoor plumbing, etc?

And the "textualism" is just another sophomoric term the Court uses to rationalize their decisions, the wording alone opens whole portions of the Constitution to interpretation based upon "textualism"

Yep, and we'd better.

 

[Celticguy]

"deprive any person of life," that being the case, how can you claim assault weapons are Constitutionally protected when their primary purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest time?

because the 2nd amendment makes them so.

you left out that "due process of law" where self defense can justify their use.

 

[Nomad]

Because they are more often used to protect innocent lives from democrat voters.

You are the CROCKmaster.

Master of the CROCK OF SHIT.