What's Worse? Chemical Weapons or Al-Qaeda?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Beefy said:
Why? Why is it our problem? Yes, its tragic whats going on over there. Horrible. But when will it stop? You think bombing them, or whatever steps we take will change anything? When is the last time that's worked? Its going to fuel the fire pal, its going to pit us further into perceived global war, listen to yourself man! Jesus, really? Now the liberals want war? +WTF is going on?
Click to expand...

I don't WANT war... I want to stop the slaughter of civilians with chemical weapons.
 
Taft2016 said:
Yeah? And *IF* Assad has used chemical weapons, they are only one piece of his tactics against the rebels.

The questions stands: which is worse?
Click to expand...
Taft you ignorant slut. The "question" only stands in the minds of non-critical thinkers such as yourself.
Normal people understand that chemical weapons, banned by the civilized world for 100 years cannot be compared to a loosely knit terrorist organization created by the actions of Bush II s idiotic invasion of two sovereign nations.

There is no actual question you disingenous muckraking talking point generator. Fuck you.
 
I like your style Rune. Who knows if I agree with you on shit, but I've always liked that Sam Kinosin style
 
Rune said:
Taft you ignorant slut. The "question" only stands in the minds of non-critical thinkers such as yourself.
Normal people understand that chemical weapons, banned by the civilized world for 100 years cannot be compared to a loosely knit terrorist organization created by the actions of Bush II s idiotic invasion of two sovereign nations.

There is no actual question you disingenous muckraking talking point generator. Fuck you.
Click to expand...
Don't hold back Rune. Tell us what you really feel.
 
maineman said:
not yet, and I certainly don't think America should go it alone. Obama needs to make the case and hope the rest of the world listens and agrees.
Click to expand...

Perhaps President Dipstick should have thought ahead about the complications of:

*Congressional approval
*United Nations approval
*International approval
*Assembling a coaltion
*Potential retaliations from Syrian allies
*The presence of Al-Qaeda among the rebels

.... *BEFORE* issuing a unilateral blowhard empty windbag red-line?

Criminy... a 6 year-old learning how to play checkers learns to think one move ahead. Our President isn't even up to that level yet.
 
Beefy said:
I like your style Rune. Who knows if I agree with you on shit, but I've always liked that Sam Kinosin style
Click to expand...

I am 100% opposed to bombing anywhere. I am a complete and total pacifist, but Taft is a partisan hack piece of shit.
 
Rune said:
Taft you ignorant slut. The "question" only stands in the minds of non-critical thinkers such as yourself.
Normal people understand that chemical weapons, banned by the civilized world for 100 years cannot be compared to a loosely knit terrorist organization created by the actions of Bush II s idiotic invasion of two sovereign nations.

There is no actual question you disingenous muckraking talking point generator. Fuck you.
Click to expand...

hahaha, Al-Qaeda is now Bush's fault too?

ROFLMAO....

Yeah, that's some real *CRITICAL* thinking there, Einstein. ahahaha
 
Beefy said:
I like your style Rune. Who knows if I agree with you on shit, but I've always liked that Sam Kinosin style
Click to expand...
i know what you mean. I miss Dixie. I can't remember the last time I was completely outraged and laughing my ass off at the same as the last time I read one of his rants.
 
maineman said:
a small franchise operation of a loosely affiliated islamic terror organization versus the use of internationally banned heinous chemical weapons against unarmed civilians? I would vote for the latter.
Click to expand...


I vote for neither of them to have a delivery system with which they can strike even past their own borders.

Take out the delivery system and no one gets to have it
 
Taft2016 said:
Perhaps President Dipstick should have thought ahead about the complications of:

*Congressional approval
*United Nations approval
*International approval
*Assembling a coaltion
*Potential retaliations from Syrian allies
*The presence of Al-Qaeda among the rebels

.... *BEFORE* issuing a unilateral blowhard empty windbag red-line?

Criminy... a 6 year-old learning how to play checkers learns to think one move ahead. Our President isn't even up to that level yet.
Click to expand...


yeah and if you take out the delivery system AQ will never own it huh
 
If we had bombed Sadams military power and taken out most of it and then left what would the middle east look like today?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top