What's the liberal solution to Islamic 2
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
evince
Truthmatters
Today,*06:25 AM
#8 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,734
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Thing1
I wonder if Irish even knows what this means.
Basically that, and end poverty.
How would you describe wealthy people like bin Laden getting into terrorism then?
SOCIOPATHY
#8 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,734
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Thing1
I wonder if Irish even knows what this means.
Basically that, and end poverty.
How would you describe wealthy people like bin Laden getting into terrorism then?
SOCIOPATHY
evince
Truthmatters
Today,*06:53 AM
#17 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,736
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Nomad
There have always been wealthy ideologues who are willing to either use their wealth to further a cause they believe in or in rare cases, actually sacrifice themselves.
Being a right-winger, I'm sure you don't understand the concept that to some people, money and having wealth are not the most important things in the world.
It's your conservative mindset that stands in the way of your understanding people who don't value money above all else.
Hence, your asking such a stupid question to begin with.
Duh.
Then with your brilliant liberal mind why would ending poverty end terrorism if money is not important?
#17 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,736
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Nomad
There have always been wealthy ideologues who are willing to either use their wealth to further a cause they believe in or in rare cases, actually sacrifice themselves.
Being a right-winger, I'm sure you don't understand the concept that to some people, money and having wealth are not the most important things in the world.
It's your conservative mindset that stands in the way of your understanding people who don't value money above all else.
Hence, your asking such a stupid question to begin with.
Duh.
Then with your brilliant liberal mind why would ending poverty end terrorism if money is not important?
evince
Truthmatters
Today,*06:53 AM
#17 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,736
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Nomad
There have always been wealthy ideologues who are willing to either use their wealth to further a cause they believe in or in rare cases, actually sacrifice themselves.
Being a right-winger, I'm sure you don't understand the concept that to some people, money and having wealth are not the most important things in the world.
It's your conservative mindset that stands in the way of your understanding people who don't value money above all else.
Hence, your asking such a stupid question to begin with.
Duh.
Then with your brilliant liberal mind why would ending poverty end terrorism if money is not important?
Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Thanks * Groans * Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:57 AM
#18 | Top
Getin the ring
Verified User
Join Date
Mar 2017
Posts
538
Thanks
0
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 18 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Thing1
Republicans think that calling it Islamic extremism makes a difference.
They also thought the Iraq War would make a difference.
They also think that restricting immigration & travel will make a difference - even though not one attack domestically was the result of either.
The right is nothing but ham-handed on this. It's an incredibly complex issue.
republicans think that it is dangerous to wait on "even though not one attack domestically was the result of either" , not only dangerous but negligent.
And republicans believe in calling it "Islamic extremism" because... ready...drum roll.... that's what it is..WOW
And republicans believe the Iraq war did make a difference, they held free elections in a part of the world where that was not possible before, in Afghanistan also.
And the Iraq war would have meant so much more if Obama had not abandoned it too soon.
The shameful left will continue to be the shameless left
dear fucking idiot
that is not the phrase you screamed about under Obama
dishonest fuck
#17 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,736
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Nomad
There have always been wealthy ideologues who are willing to either use their wealth to further a cause they believe in or in rare cases, actually sacrifice themselves.
Being a right-winger, I'm sure you don't understand the concept that to some people, money and having wealth are not the most important things in the world.
It's your conservative mindset that stands in the way of your understanding people who don't value money above all else.
Hence, your asking such a stupid question to begin with.
Duh.
Then with your brilliant liberal mind why would ending poverty end terrorism if money is not important?
Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Thanks * Groans * Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:57 AM
#18 | Top
Getin the ring
Verified User
Join Date
Mar 2017
Posts
538
Thanks
0
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 18 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Thing1
Republicans think that calling it Islamic extremism makes a difference.
They also thought the Iraq War would make a difference.
They also think that restricting immigration & travel will make a difference - even though not one attack domestically was the result of either.
The right is nothing but ham-handed on this. It's an incredibly complex issue.
republicans think that it is dangerous to wait on "even though not one attack domestically was the result of either" , not only dangerous but negligent.
And republicans believe in calling it "Islamic extremism" because... ready...drum roll.... that's what it is..WOW
And republicans believe the Iraq war did make a difference, they held free elections in a part of the world where that was not possible before, in Afghanistan also.
And the Iraq war would have meant so much more if Obama had not abandoned it too soon.
The shameful left will continue to be the shameless left
dear fucking idiot
that is not the phrase you screamed about under Obama
dishonest fuck
evince
Truthmatters
Today,*07:04 AM
#21 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,737
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by GazzaQueen
Not a single liberal solution so far. They would rather allow these slaughtering pigs to murder their own pre-teen girls at children's concerts than inconvenience a single murderer.
There isn't a single solution to terrorism. It's been around as long as man has and will never go away. That doesn't mean we can't work to reduce it but it's not as simple as saying 'do X and it will be gone'.
#21 | Top
cawacko
High Level of Addiction
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
35,737
Thanks
2,000
Thanked 8,754 Times in 6,031 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 323 Times in 301 Posts
Originally Posted by GazzaQueen
Not a single liberal solution so far. They would rather allow these slaughtering pigs to murder their own pre-teen girls at children's concerts than inconvenience a single murderer.
There isn't a single solution to terrorism. It's been around as long as man has and will never go away. That doesn't mean we can't work to reduce it but it's not as simple as saying 'do X and it will be gone'.
evince
Truthmatters
Today,*07:17 AM
#32 | Top
GazzaQueen
Verified User
Join Date
Dec 2016
Posts
2,154
Thanks
297
Thanked 611 Times in 444 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Thing1
Because there is a finite # of terrorists, right?
There are still Nazis and KKK members. They're just not powerful enough to cause any damage.
So just live with it. I'm sure your daughters are proud of you
you fucks kill people asshole
they shoot up churches
#32 | Top
GazzaQueen
Verified User
Join Date
Dec 2016
Posts
2,154
Thanks
297
Thanked 611 Times in 444 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Thing1
Because there is a finite # of terrorists, right?
There are still Nazis and KKK members. They're just not powerful enough to cause any damage.
So just live with it. I'm sure your daughters are proud of you
you fucks kill people asshole
they shoot up churches