Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
"Trump is challenging my death count? Here, hold my beer."
--- Hillary
--- Hillary
What will Trumps death count be up to by the time he leaves office?
- Thread starter jbander
- Start date
That was quite stupid. There is some evidence it actually started in Kansas. However, that is the name it got from the 1920s onward.IF you say Spanish flu, people know what you are talking about. Does the Trump virus act like a bully?
Your shit is so stupid, The only way you can make your bullshit true is if you get to define Marxism communism or socialism yourself, Which every good Traitor to our country does. . It already has a definition and that definition says yours is just stupid nonsense. There are three or four main tenets of The big three , none that exist in this country. It is even made easier for the airheads , There is only one way that all three of these are implemented and without that one tenet their is no Marxism , communism or socialism. The means of production are owned by the state and the sales of that production is charged to the state. Idiot that mean every business in owned and run by the state. I will make this simple and moves directly to your ignorance. When was the last time ace, that someone came up to you and said "you know I think it would be a good idea if government takes over all businesses and ran them themselves and that they should be the only seller of their product.Never happened and never will , just as I said. I love it when these no brains make a big point of reading Marx when in fact in reading Marx it proves that these so called experts on the subject have no clue what thy are talking about.
Lets add in one more stupid comment , just because The Nazi party was called socialist they in no way were socialist. When they came about , it was a period in history where the intellects had a big interest in socialism and reform. Nazism was started at that time. And they took in the name "National Socialist German Workers' Party" to win a popularity contest basically, get support. Attracting people to their cause. Now keep in mind they never claimed to be socialist, they were national socialist and in fact one of the main premise of National socialism is that they hated communism. Which of course they did. and sorry rednecks ,Bernie is a democratic socialist which also is not socialism. The stupids out there say that social security is socialism because it had the word social in it. We are dealing with the brain dead of the right. So this is what you get.
Based Chad
Was it me?
I heard trump is faking it. that sounds right. I can't believe you fell for it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
If you look up quickly you can see it flying over your head.
Do you know how people can tell you're a moron Leftist without you ever talking about politics?
Based Chad
Was it me?
well, he's got ten fingers, so ten?
Based Chad
Was it me?
yep, here you are!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I'm not the one who made your statements. You did.
Too funny. So you object to Karl Marx being the authoritative source on Marxism.
I think we're done here. You make this too esy.
Incorrect. I gave you the links to the Communist Manifesto and to Das Kapital which clearly show you to be incompetent on the subject, and additionally suggest that you cannot read.
You are raving incoherently. The United States is Marxist to the extent that it implements Marxist ideas. Our current tax code is Marxist, taken right out of the Communist Manifesto as well as compulsory public schools for children in addition to child labor laws.
You really should learn the subject matter before forming violent opinions on areas of your ignornace.
Lets add in a few more stupid comments, just because ...
The National Socialist Labor Party was Socialist. You make this way too easy.
Yes. Giovanni Gentile had suggested that socialism would be far more successful if socialist leaders would simply expand the appeal to all the politically disenfrachised as being of one common "family" of victims as opposed to Marx's exclusive focus on materialism and on the poor working class. Thus Adolph Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Lenin, Pol Pot and Hugo Chavez implemented socialism with strong nationalist appeals and rode that angle to become dictators.
Keep in mind that they advertized being socialist as well as their hated for communists, as all socialists do. Of course, they hated capitalism as well.
Yes. Hitler's intention was not to benefit the international community but to bring socialism to Deutschland.
It's socialism. Your inability to articulate any substantive difference reveals the truth of the matter.
This discussion isn't going to end well for you but I'm happy to rake you over the coals for as long as you like.
You have no clue what you are talking about, marx's communist Manefesto has 10 planks to implement Its premise Guess what the first one is Bozo 1.1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose. Your a joke and have no clue what you are talking about. lETS KEEP THIS SIMPLE FOR THE WEAK MINDED ,Are the means of production in this country owned and operated by the state, NOPE there is no communism socialism or Maxism in the country nor will there ever be , capitalism is theonly way. This is what we call a idiots tool to insult. The only way the rednecks can make it so is by defining it themselve. YUK YUK!
insulting and stupid. Yep a board Trumpy.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You mean to say that Marx doesn't know what he's talking about when he talks about Marxism and that you don't accept Marx as an authoritative source on Marxism. This is why you are a moron and why you make it too easy to pick you apart.
... plus an entire Manifesto more. Additionally, there is Das Kapital that one must understand if one wants to understand Marx.
1. Abolition of private property is an absolute requirement for communism. Guess what, Hitler had no plans to implement communism and step down. Hitler intended to bring socialism to Deuschland.
2. What is required for socialism is A) central planning of all industries which was accomplished by the Four Year Plan, B) central control of all communication which was accomplished through Goebbles Ministry of Propaganda and C) centralization of all credit by the State which was accomplished via the Reichbank.
3. Herman Goering extended to some people the polite, token courtesy of allowing them to remain the "owners" of their businesses but it was a meaningless gesture since Goering controlled all businesses.
So let's just restate for the record that your official position is that the following are not Marxist:
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form.
Too funny. You make this far too easy.
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
+1 with jbander on 11/4/2020
Try harder You idiot, so public school and a progressive tax makes you Marxist. Eaton was the first public school in history , It was in England in the 1400's You do know it was a kingdom then I hope , Every civilized country in the world has a progressive tax rate. SO you are trying to say that England was Marxist in 1400 and all civilized country's in the worlds are Marxist. Everything that comes out of you mouth makes you look more ignorant with every word.
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
The OP and 2nd faggot will die from TDS next year.
Boy they are clowns. These people would be better off just admitting they have no clue what they are talking about , because as long as they try to sell their nonsense here , I'll eat them up and spit them out. These no brains need a dose for the stupidity. THERE IS NO MARXISM< COMMUNISM OR SOCIALISM IN THIS COUNTRY AND THERE NEVER WILL BE < CAPITALISM IS TH ONLY WAY. These brain dead think that if a country has a social program that makes them commies. By the way social programs go back before Christ and just about every country that has existed since then have had social programs , So these dorks are trying to say every country is socialist, or Marxist or communist. They are total idiots.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. You make it too easy. I know eighth graders who are more difficult to refute.
What a moron! You still don't get it. Too funny.
All of Marx's points are Marxist. I have no idea why you are trying so desperately to argue that they aren't but it would appear that you don't apply any sanity checks to anything you write.
So let's just restate for the record that your official position is that the following are not Marxist:
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form.
You have already lost. Yes, the above mentioned points are Marxist. The US has implemented these. Ergo, there are some Marxist policies implemented in the US.
Please squirm some more. Once you have done that, try some different weaseling. It's not going to work, but I will certainly get a laugh.
You're a little late but at least you finally agree with me that Marxism is widespread.
Did Marx call for the implementation of 1400's England?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Too funny. You're the circus clown act. You're the butt of the joke. You're an uneducated moron who struggles to string together a coherent sentence.
I'm still waiting for you to say something intelligent.
.... waiting. tick. tock. tick. tock.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
At least it's not Obama's 20,000,000.