What the special council is really after

Evmetro said:
I will answer this if you can demonstrate that you have objectively read the article and can explain why I titled the thread the way I did. "Objectively" summarizing this will open the door to intelligent debate and discussion, and it won't hurt you political position.
Click to expand...

You're clearly not here to discuss this, dunce, as all you've done is post an article and whined that others aren't 'objectively' commenting on it.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
You're clearly not here to discuss this, dunce, as all you've done is post an article and whined that others aren't 'objectively' commenting on it.
Click to expand...

It is not out of the ordinary for a lefty to respond to an opening post with something other than a reply that demonstrates that he has read and understands it or any links that were included. I am not surprised when lefties do this, I just like to avoid taking the derailment direction that lefties provide in lieu of an appropriate reply.
 
You don't really care about Mr. Manafort's bank fraud," Ellis said to prosecutor Michael Dreeben, at times losing his temper. Ellis said prosecutors were interested in Manafort because of his potential to provide material that would lead to Trump's "prosecution or impeachment," Ellis said.
"That's what you're really interested in," said Ellis, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

Ellis repeated his suspicion several times in the hour-long court hearing. He said he'll make a decision at a later date about whether Manafort's case can go forward.

"We don't want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It's unlikely you're going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants," Ellis told Dreeben. "The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power."
 
Evmetro said:
It is not out of the ordinary for a lefty to respond to an opening post with something other than a reply that demonstrates that he has read and understands it or any links that were included. I am not surprised when lefties do this, I just like to avoid taking the derailment direction that lefties provide in lieu of an appropriate reply.
Click to expand...

So you admit you have nothing and no ability to discuss this topic.

Thanks. That was clear from the get-go.

Good of you to confess you don't understand the subject.
 
noise said:
You don't really care about Mr. Manafort's bank fraud," Ellis said to prosecutor Michael Dreeben, at times losing his temper. Ellis said prosecutors were interested in Manafort because of his potential to provide material that would lead to Trump's "prosecution or impeachment," Ellis said.
"That's what you're really interested in," said Ellis, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

Ellis repeated his suspicion several times in the hour-long court hearing. He said he'll make a decision at a later date about whether Manafort's case can go forward.

"We don't want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It's unlikely you're going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants," Ellis told Dreeben. "The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power."
Click to expand...

Lefties fear that if they do what you just did, it will somehow hurt the lefty cause. The simple thing that you were able to demonstrate is an essential step that must be taken in order for there to be any intelligent debate or discussion about any topic. If lefties cannot do this, they are 100% guaranteed to lose any debate about whatever subject a thread is about.
 
noise said:
You don't really care about Mr. Manafort's bank fraud," Ellis said to prosecutor Michael Dreeben, at times losing his temper. Ellis said prosecutors were interested in Manafort because of his potential to provide material that would lead to Trump's "prosecution or impeachment," Ellis said.
"That's what you're really interested in," said Ellis, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

Ellis repeated his suspicion several times in the hour-long court hearing. He said he'll make a decision at a later date about whether Manafort's case can go forward.

"We don't want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It's unlikely you're going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants," Ellis told Dreeben. "The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power."
Click to expand...

He's a judge with an opinion, interesting how he went beyond what was asked of him and imported his own personal view, but he has to render a decision, as you know from seeing Supreme Court hearings over the years, what they ask isn't often any real barometer on how they will rule, everyone thought the ACA was doomed after the questioning period
 
Ellis scoffed, summing up the argument of the Special Counsel’s Office as, "We said this was what [the] investigation was about, but we are not bound by it and we were lying."
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Then why do you keep following me around like some odd gay puppy and begging?
Click to expand...

Once again, what is your fascination with all things gay? Other than the obvious about you. Look, it is accepted in society nowadays. It is not like everyone does not already know you are gay. Face your reality.
 
Sailor said:
Once again, what is your fascination with all things gay? Other than the obvious about you. Look, it is accepted in society nowadays. It is not like everyone does not already know you are gay. Face your reality.
Click to expand...

Well, when I'm addressing an out gay man such as yourself, as desperate as you are, I tend to couch my answers to fit the audience.

You seem to still have some longstanding self-hatred issues with your homosexuality.

Have you considered that facing your daddy issues head on might clear that up?
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Well, when I'm addressing an out gay man such as yourself, as desperate as you are, I tend to couch my answers to fit the audience.

You seem to still have some longstanding self-hatred issues with your homosexuality.

Have you considered that facing your daddy issues head on might clear that up?
Click to expand...

Like, ah, "deeper brother, deeper"? You poor dumb bastard.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
No, that's clearly what you whisper over your shoulder to your father.

And that's kinda of sickening.

Please stop hating yourself, Tinkerbell.
Click to expand...

You seem to be talking from vast personal experience. You poor dumb bastard. Speaking of which broke fuck, what kind of "job" do you have that you supposedly pay taxes with? This ought to be good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top