What should the Democrats do after taking their country back?

[FUCK THE POLICE]

I propose we nationalize all private businesses in the US, repeal the second amendment, and abolish the states, establishing a single, unitary, all encompassing national government. It would be a good start.

 

[Teflon Don]

I propose we nationalize all private businesses in the US, repeal the second amendment, and abolish the states, establishing a single, unitary, all encompassing national government. It would be a good start.

Who is we?

You?

Don't make me laugh

 

[Althea]

I think the question is 'what can the Democrats do'?

After the election, Republicans will scramble to approve Obama's SC nomination.

After the inauguration, nothing will happen in an inept Congress for four years.

 

[anatta]

I propose we nationalize all private businesses in the US, repeal the second amendment, and abolish the states, establishing a single, unitary, all encompassing national government. It would be a good start.

they haven't done that already?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I propose we nationalize all private businesses in the US, repeal the second amendment, and abolish the states, establishing a single, unitary, all encompassing national government. It would be a good start.

Giving everyone full-citizens' rights, at birth, as well......so parents can no-longer abuse/assault their children, in the guise of "discipline". ​

 

[sear]

" What should the Democrats do after taking their country back? "

Leave us the Hell ALONE!

"The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits." Thomas Jefferson

 

[Leonthecat]

Single payer.
Should be easy with the house and senate on her side.

 

[anatta]

" What should the Democrats do after taking their country back? "

Leave us the Hell ALONE!

that's one thing you aren't going to get.
You will get an increase in federal powers /purviews. You will get more stifling regulalions, you will get a skewed left Supreme Court.

And you get 4 years of Hillary!! The Arkansas grifters are baaack, and now they are gonna tell you what you can and can't do.

 

[christiefan915]

I think the question is 'what can the Democrats do'?

After the election, Republicans will scramble to approve Obama's SC nomination.

After the inauguration, nothing will happen in an inept Congress for four years.

Cons are so phony. They won't give Garland a fair hearing because they said the people should decide the next justice via the election.

Now McCain's come out and said "[republicans] will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up..."

Cons are duplicitous and dirty.

 

[tinfoil]

Single payer.
Should be easy with the house and senate on her side.

And strip her donors of huge profits? Not likely

 

[PostmodernProphet]

What should the Democrats do after taking their country back?

surrender.....

 

[Leonthecat]

And strip her donors of huge profits? Not likely

Don't bet on it.

 

[Leonthecat]

surrender.....

Nah, that's what you should do now, Pimp.

 

[Airstrip One]

Giving everyone full-citizens' rights, at birth, as well......so parents can no-longer abuse/assault their children, in the guise of "discipline". ​

I take-it your parents were unable to achieve much with you growing up?

 

[Althea]

Cons are so phony. They won't give Garland a fair hearing because they said the people should decide the next justice via the election.

Now McCain's come out and said "[republicans] will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up..."

Cons are duplicitous and dirty.

Yep....we might get the Senate, so the SC might move forward.

As for anything else, the obstruction will continue.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Nah, that's what you should do now, Pimp.

that's what Dems thought Trump should have done last night.....

 

[Teflon Don]

Cons are so phony. They won't give Garland a fair hearing because they said the people should decide the next justice via the election.

Now McCain's come out and said "[republicans] will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up..."

Cons are duplicitous and dirty.

Yes because the democrat party has been so accommodating with Supreme Court picks.

Dumb cumtwat

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Single payer.
Should be easy with the house and senate on her side.

Just the fact the insurance-companies are driving costs, thru-the-roof.....in their never ending efforts to show profits, year-after-year....is reason-enough to cut them outta-the-process.

We don't have any such obligation(s) to ensure/'guarantee" Robo's investments.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07102009/transcript2.html​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Yes because the democrat party has been so accommodating with Supreme Court picks.

.....And, Republicans have been so accommodating about refusing to vote on Dems' nominees....specifically, that opportunistic little bitch; John McCain.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...te-louis-brandeis_us_57892bfbe4b08608d334728f

*
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-gop-scotus-20161019-snap-story.html​

 

[Teflon Don]

.....And, Republicans have been so accommodating about refusing to vote on Dems' nominees....specifically, that opportunistic little bitch; John McCain.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...te-louis-brandeis_us_57892bfbe4b08608d334728f

*
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-gop-scotus-20161019-snap-story.html​

Teddy Kennedy started it with Bork. Stop crying bitches. Don't worry the GOP senate will give Trump his nominees.

What will be awesome is if Ginsberg keels over two days after Trump is inaugurated. That would be great