What Republicans really want is a nanny state

cawacko said:
I'm a Republican though so me voting for Romney would not have been surprising. I've made it plenty clear on this board I do not support Trump, do not like Trump and will not vote for Trump. Trump's position on trade is god awful. It's not Trump that pulled Hillary left on trade though it was Bernie.

I do not understand the Libertarian argument for Hillary. Hawkish foreign policy on top of "free college", more "free gov't healthcare" and Keynesian stimulus on steroids. What is the Libertarian appeal there?

This is the one year there might be enough disaffected voters to allow Johnson to get that 5% number.
Click to expand...

You are delusional. I did not make a case for Hillary. I am not the one that brought her up. You are letting yourself be played by the White supremacist retard, IHA, and his diversionary maneuver was not even that clever. If you want to be a perpetual sucker then I will leave you to it.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
You are delusional. I did not make a case for Hillary. I am not the one that brought her up. You are letting yourself be played by the White supremacist retard, IHA, and his diversionary maneuver was not even that clever. If you want to be a perpetual sucker then I will leave you to it.
Click to expand...

Huh? What does ILA have to do with anything I've said here?

You brought up Hillary in post 3.

Perpetual sucker for what? Not supporting Trump or Hillary?
 
cawacko said:
Huh? What does ILA have to do with anything I've said here?

You brought up Hillary in post 3.

Perpetual sucker for what? Not supporting Trump or Hillary?
Click to expand...


ZzzzzZzzzz... Can we talk about actual issues and not posters?

You are delusional. No, I did not bring up Hillary in post #3. I responded to a comment (from what I assumed was IHA, his sock puppet or one of his clones) attempting to change the subject. You then come to his aid with more attempts to divert discussion to me and away from Trump's bad policies. You ARE supporting Trump and being led around by the nose by him and his supporters.

To a narcissist it might be flattering that you, ILA and others are so obsessed with their views, but for me it's a nuisance. I am not interested in free room and board in those moldy, cramped and dark spaces.

Personally, I would rather challenge the bullshit Bernie Trump is spewing than talk about me or other posters.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
ZzzzzZzzzz... Can we talk about actual issues and not posters?

You are delusional. No, I did not bring up Hillary in post #3. I responded to a comment (from what I assumed was IHA, his sock puppet or one of his clones) attempting to change the subject. You then come to his aid with more attempts to divert discussion to me and away from Trump's bad policies. You ARE supporting Trump and being led around by the nose by him and his supporters.

To a narcissist it might be flattering that you, ILA and others are so obsessed with their views, but for me it's a nuisance. I am not interested in free room and board in those moldy, cramped and dark spaces.

Personally, I would rather challenge the bullshit Bernie Trump is spewing than talk about me or other posters.
Click to expand...

I'm supporting Trump? So the anti Trump posts I start are just a camaflouge? The arguments I get into on this board with other Republicans over Trump are just lies? Having other Republicans say I'm a RINO or no longer a Republican because I don't support Trump or what he stands for is just a facade?

Sure thing dude. Enjoy your conversion to Paul Krugamn and Keynesian econonics.
 
cawacko said:
I'm supporting Trump? So the anti Trump posts I start are just a camaflouge? The arguments I get into on this board with other Republicans over Trump are just lies? Having other Republicans say I'm a RINO or no longer a Republican because I don't support Trump or what he stands for is just a facade?

Sure thing dude. Enjoy your conversion to Paul Krugamn and Keynesian econonics.
Click to expand...

I don't have those threads before me to comment on but why are you adopting their tactics or what is it that makes it less transparent when it is directed at others?

No, I don't think you are trying to camouflage anything. You have always seemed genuine to me. A genuine sucker, maybe, but genuine.

Krugman, at least, understands trade.

Your party has been thoroughly Keynesian since Nixon, at least.
 
Establishment said:
I can't really disagree with your OP or this post. Trump is a much bigger douchebag than Bernmaster Sandy. I could probably sit-down and have a beer with Bernie.
Click to expand...

Whilst having a beer with him, can you ask why he wants to shut down all the nuclear reactors in the USA?

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Nonsense, voting against an authoritarian dumbass like Trump does not conflict with Libertarianism at all.

If you are voting Trump, then it's because you are a racist or really stupid.
Click to expand...

Now where did I hear that before? Oh yes during the Brexit debates!!

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
I don't have those threads before me to comment on but why are you adopting their tactics or what is it that makes it less transparent when it is directed at others?

No, I don't think you are trying to camouflage anything. You have always seemed genuine to me. A genuine sucker, maybe, but genuine.

Krugman, at least, understands trade.

Your party has been thoroughly Keynesian since Nixon, at least.
Click to expand...

Krugman understands trade? He does in his personal life but not so much in his professional column writing one. Two Austrian economists have an excellent podcast called Contra Krugman which discuss his columns each week from an economic perspective and consistently show how he contorts his economic beliefs to meet his partisan needs.

I've always been for free trade and I'm pro immigration. I am pro markets. Nixon was a huge Keynesian and we saw its failings. The Obama stimulus was a failure and Krugman was all behind that one with him wanting even more.

Bill Clinton actually supported free trade. Look at Hillary now turning her back on the TPP that she negotiated.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
I don't have those threads before me to comment on but why are you adopting their tactics or what is it that makes it less transparent when it is directed at others?

No, I don't think you are trying to camouflage anything. You have always seemed genuine to me. A genuine sucker, maybe, but genuine.

Krugman, at least, understands trade.

Your party has been thoroughly Keynesian since Nixon, at least.
Click to expand...

You think Reagan was Keynesian?
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
I don't have those threads before me to comment on but why are you adopting their tactics or what is it that makes it less transparent when it is directed at others?

No, I don't think you are trying to camouflage anything. You have always seemed genuine to me. A genuine sucker, maybe, but genuine.

Krugman, at least, understands trade.

Your party has been thoroughly Keynesian since Nixon, at least.
Click to expand...

If you still hold your Austrian beliefs this a fun and excellent site/podcasts.

http://contrakrugman.com/
 
Why on earth is USFREAKDUMB posting in a thread on economics?
Even more inane does the idiot really think anyone would ever think he is Yurt?
Holy shit.
 
DARLA'S BIATCH said:
Why on earth is USFREAKDUMB posting in a thread on economics?
Even more inane does the idiot really think anyone would ever think he is Yurt?
Holy shit.
Click to expand...

187kfo.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top