What Phil Robertson DID do

Superfreak said:
So you think people didn't know how pregnancy occurred prior to 150 years ago?

While they may not have been able to see the phenomenon and not have the tech to pinpoint it early in life, that doesn't change the fact that as soon as they realized the woman was pregnant, it was that she was pregnant with CHILD. No one ever said, 'pregnant with FETUS'. No one ever pretended the child wasn't a real 'person'.

Life begins at conception. That is a scientific FACT. Pretending otherwise is simply absurd. IF the fertilized egg attaches, then it will continue to grow and develop. If not, it dies and is expelled from the body naturally. Again... FACT. Obviously miscarriages occur (natural death) as do still borns (some times natural, sometimes accidental), but at no point is it not a child/progeny. At no time is it anything other than human. As long as it is alive and human, you are trying to find a way to justify taking that life if you believe in abortion.

I am of the opinion that the child deserves basic human rights protections, the first and most important right being that of life. Thus, the only reason the mother should be able to 'choose' to kill the child is if it was a life vs. a life, where only one of the two could survive. Every other instance, with the exception of rape, is that of convenience.
Click to expand...

is a sperm alive?


is a human egg alive?
 
evince said:
is a sperm alive?


is a human egg alive?
Click to expand...
A zygote is definitely alive, as is a fetus. So long as the zygote is human, it is a developing human life at that point. That you pretend we can't call it human is where science, facts, reality, and you part ways.
 
maineman said:
how can you judge its credibility?
Click to expand...

just in noticing it is attempting to prove something is true when it so obviously isn't.....if you presented me with a "scholarly" paper in which someone tried to convince us that Pluto orbited the sun closer than the earth does I wouldn't need to read it to judge its credibility either.....
 
Damocles said:
A zygote is definitely alive, as is a fetus. So long as the zygote is human, it is a developing human life at that point. That you pretend we can't call it human is where science, facts, reality, and you part ways.
Click to expand...

human sperm is alive and no fetus can start without some.



you really don't want to be prosecuting 13 year old boys for wacking off do you?
 
sperm is tissue inside a persons body.


do you get to say that those humans in which its contained have no right to that tissue do you?
 
evince said:
human sperm is alive and no fetus can start without some.



you really don't want to be prosecuting 13 year old boys for wacking off do you?
Click to expand...

A human sperm cell does not contain the DNA sequence for a new unique human being. It only contains half of the code. The other half comes from the human egg cell. When they COMBINE (the sperm cell fertilizes the egg cell) THEN it becomes a unique human life. Which is why people say 'Life begins at CONCEPTION'


Thanks for once again proving you don't understand biology and that you will continue to ignore SCIENCE and the FACTS that are in front of you.
 
if it can not survive outside the human body that made it exist then its part of that persons flesh.


This has already been decided.


stop being stupid
 
evince said:
if it can not survive outside the human body that made it exist then its part of that persons flesh.
Click to expand...

LMAO... that is complete nonsense. Based on nothing more than what you WANT it to mean. You ignore SCIENCE and the FACTS because you don't wish to be reminded that an abortion ENDS a HUMAN LIFE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top