What is woke about the lil mermaid?

Nomad said:
I knew you wouldn't have the BALLS to read it.

Because you're an old tranny pussy who's scared of the truth.

Just like you were at DCJ.

Chicken shit.
Click to expand...

I didn't read it because I don't care about it. Literally. It's your agenda, not mine. Don't like drag shows or story hours? Don't go. No one is making you. I'll bet you love you some DeSantis. Make sure you impose YOUR puritanical bullshit on the rest of us.

Thanks, but ho thanks.

When you start calling names, you've lost the argument. You lose.
 
Concart said:
I didn't read it because I don't care about it. Literally. It's your agenda, not mine. Don't like drag shows or story hours? Don't go. No one is making you. I'll bet you love you some DeSantis. Make sure you impose YOUR puritanical bullshit on the rest of us.

Thanks, but ho thanks. .
Click to expand...

Like I said, you're too chickenshit to face the truth.

You only care about supporting your team.

Right or wrong, you don't care.

Which means you're as fucked up in the head as any Trumper and just as bad.

Opposite side of the same stupid, worthless coin.

Concart said:
When you start calling names, you've lost the argument. You lose.
Click to expand...

You mean like....

Concart said:
I. DON'T. CARE.

Ever been to a drag show? Of course you haven't. It is neither sexual or provocative. You are a whiny crybaby.
Click to expand...

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...e-about-the-lil-mermaid&p=5656341#post5656341

:laugh:

I don't recall you being quite this clumsy and buffoonish Hoodieman, but thanks for admitting you lost the argument. :thup:
 
Nomad said:
Like I said, you're too chickenshit to face the truth.

You only care about supporting your team.

Right or wrong, you don't care.

Which means you're as fucked up in the head as any Trumper and just as bad.

Opposite side of the same stupid, worthless coin.



You mean like....



https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...e-about-the-lil-mermaid&p=5656341#post5656341

:laugh:

I don't recall you being quite this clumsy and buffoonish Hoodieman, but thanks for admitting you lost the argument. :thup:
Click to expand...

Nope. I'm commenting on your posts here. You are indeed a whiny crybaby. I don't have a team. But obviously YOU must. I don't even think in those terms. I'm not a 'chickenshit', I simply have no skin in the game. None. I literally had never heard of transgender story hour until you half wits started to lose your mind over it. Same with CRT. Never heard of it until you hijacked it and redefined it. I guess my ownership of you extends all the way back to a now defunct message board. Wow. Talk about a fixation.
 
Concart said:
Nope. I'm commenting on your posts here. You are indeed a whiny crybaby. I don't have a team. But obviously YOU must. I don't even think in those terms. I'm not a 'chickenshit', I simply have no skin in the game. None. I literally had never heard of transgender story hour until you half wits started to lose your mind over it. Same with CRT. Never heard of it until you hijacked it and redefined it. I guess my ownership of you extends all the way back to a now defunct message board. Wow. Talk about a fixation.
Click to expand...

All bullshit ^^^^^

You claimed that name calling equates to having lost the argument AFTER you apparently forgot that you had been the first to engage in it.

And yes you DO have a team.

Your team is the morally superior-minded progressive left which thinks it can do or think no wrong and promotes the notion that anyone should do whatever makes them happy as long as it doesn't involve guns, but if it exposes young children to a bunch of fat, hairy old perverts in clown makeup, dressed in women's lingerie, spiked heels and neon colored wigs reading to them from books about how to grow up gay, it's just fine and dandy.

You think I'm exaggerating about that, but it is the literal truth. Read the article. Do some research.

Your team supports "anything goes" even if it indoctrinates and has a detrimental effect on children.

Congratulations.

You must feel so proud.
 
Nomad said:
You're too fucking stupid to know the difference between pandering and knowing who the audience is.

Pandering is bowing to demands of minorities just to keep them quiet and not causing trouble.

What you described was an industry responding to consumer demand.

Get a clue, you bitchy little Karen.
Click to expand...

hahahahaha,

As if business do not "pander" to majority populations.

everything you say shows how stupid you are and why you should not comment on business.

Business absolutely do pander to their majority clientele. They try to figure out exactly what they want and give it to them. You call that 'ok'.

When they do that to a minority population you call it "bowing to demands" which is another way of saying they are trying to 'match supply to demand'.


WTF is wrong with business using the dynamic of Supply and Demand to address their customers?

Do you not know that is the underlying principle in business since business has been around is SUPPLY AND DEMAND?

And here you are doing your loudest Karen cry 'HOW DARE THEY CONSIDER CUSTOMER DEMAND!!'


God damn you are a weak ass Karen pussy.
 
Concart said:
Disney has 117 million reasons to agree with you. And that was just opening weekend. It's a wonderful family film with a positive message. I would feel that way if Ariel was white, black, Hispanic or Asian. Of course these Neanderthals' hate it. Ariel should marry the prince, have all of his babies, and cook and clean in the kitchen while he is off exploring the world. WTF is wrong with all you woke idiots :)

ROTFLMFAO!!!
Click to expand...

I mean read what he said and how stupid it is.

He does not think businesses should cater to minority group (growing groups) demand for the type of product they will spend their money on.

Chocolate and Vanilla ice cream might be the two best sellers, but there are a whole bunch of minority market share flavours that businesses want to sell too, so they can mkae money not just on the majority ones.

Why does it make him cry ....'BUT I LIKE VANILLA...WHY ARE THEY CATERING TO THE DEMANDS OF MINORITY INTERESTS'.


It is one of the most stupid lines of argumentation i have heard anyone make on this topic.

No one forces these businesses to give minority interests what they want. The businesses have their choice. So you have a minority of people who will gladly pay for different content, and some business happy to sell it to them.

And that is what angers him. CAPITALISM.
 
QP! said:
hahahahaha,

As if business do not "pander" to majority populations.

everything you say shows how stupid you are and why you should not comment on business.

Business absolutely do pander to their majority clientele. They try to figure out exactly what they want and give it to them. You call that 'ok'.

When they do that to a minority population you call it "bowing to demands" which is another way of saying they are trying to 'match supply to demand'.


WTF is wrong with business using the dynamic of Supply and Demand to address their customers?

Do you not know that is the underlying principle in business since business has been around is SUPPLY AND DEMAND?

And here you are doing your loudest Karen cry 'HOW DARE THEY CONSIDER CUSTOMER DEMAND!!'


God damn you are a weak ass Karen pussy.
Click to expand...

Fuck you, silly queen. :fu:

How would you even know what a pussy is, since you've never even seen one? :laugh:

Disney set to lose millions as The Little Mermaid tanks

The Walt Disney Company is facing potential financial losses with the release of the live-action remake of The Little Mermaid during the Memorial Day weekend.

Box office analysts have provided speculation that this company, often associated with progressive ideals, may experience significant financial setbacks due to the live-action remake of the film.

The movie has been seen to be doing better at the domestic box office than overseas, raking in approximately $300M-$350M in the U.S. and Canada, as opposed to $260M abroad.

According to financial sources, The Little Mermaid, with a reported production cost of $250 million and a global marketing expenditure of $140 million, has a strong chance of reaching the break-even point.

Nevertheless, if its worldwide earnings fall below the modest threshold of around $400 million, this film may incur a loss of approximately $20 million, causing it to struggle financially.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/ne...lions-as-the-little-mermaid-tanks/ar-AA1c9dWq
Click to expand...

:laugh:

They're going to be lucky if they break even.

So please lecture me some more about business and supply and demand.

You ridiculous joke.

Go put on your drag queen regalia and find a story hour event with the rest of your fat hairy-fairy crowd.

Loser.
 
QP! said:
I mean read what he said and how stupid it is.

He does not think businesses should cater to minority group (growing groups) demand for the type of product they will spend their money on.

Chocolate and Vanilla ice cream might be the two best sellers, but there are a whole bunch of minority market share flavours that businesses want to sell too, so they can mkae money not just on the majority ones.

Why does it make him cry ....'BUT I LIKE VANILLA...WHY ARE THEY CATERING TO THE DEMANDS OF MINORITY INTERESTS'.


It is one of the most stupid lines of argumentation i have heard anyone make on this topic.

No one forces these businesses to give minority interests what they want. The businesses have their choice. So you have a minority of people who will gladly pay for different content, and some business happy to sell it to them.

And that is what angers him. CAPITALISM.
Click to expand...

Blacks do not represent anywhere near the majority, or even an equal portion of the American movie going public, you retarded homo.

Their entire demographic only represents 12% of the population.

And of that 12%.... MAYBE half are potential movie theater box-office customers.

A relatively intelligent fifth grader could understand the economic implications of that.

But I guess it's too much for a silly, bubble-headed queen to grasp.

Too busy grasping other things.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
DeSantis, Abbott, and it seems just about anybody who isn't an avowed democratic socialist.
Click to expand...
That's a lot of "banning"... but I looked for stories about children being unable to get the books they wished to read...I couldn't find any...
 
Cypress said:
We won't be hearing the rightwing screaming about wokism in 24 months.

It will disappear with other campaign slogans, like Sharia Law and wars on Christmas.


Leaving aside the poutrage over buzzwords, it really just comes down to racial resentment.
Click to expand...

Let's hope so, but I'm not so sure.

Disagreed. This seems a symptom of a larger problem. Fearful, stupid people who outnumber or are more powerful than their opposites always seem to cause lot of violence....out of fear.

Fearful people are not always cowardly people. They can be dangerous. James Baldwin said it perfectly, IMHO:

OIP.fGwLbL9A9dkIKjV-NXDzjwHaD4
 
I evaluate the donated books I receive before I pass them on... some do not make it into classrooms...I offer those directly to parents...Does that mean I'm somehow "banning books" as well?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top