What is the LEGAL JUSTIFICATION for DACA?

[Text Drivers are Killers]

How can a president give millions of criminal invaders a certificate saying they are free to live here and work here even though the LAW says they can do neither???

Why isn't that obstruction of justice???

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

The constitution says one of the duties of the president i

"He shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed"

Obama should have been removed and trump should be if he continues DACA.

 

[Pappy Jones]

All things immigration are place solely at the feet of the President by the Constitution, he was President so that's justification enough from a legal standpoint. I hope Trump just lets it die, he will announce his decision on Tuesday.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

All things immigration are place solely at the feet of the President by the Constitution, he was President so that's justification enough from a legal standpoint. I hope Trump just lets it die, he will announce his decision on Tuesday.

HAHAHA. What a brazen liar you are. The constitution grants ZERO immigration power to the president!!! Article 1 section 8 grants congress the power to "establish a uniform rule of naturalization".

Do you really expect to get away with such blatant lying???

 

[Pappy Jones]

HAHAHA. What a brazen liar you are. The constitution grants ZERO immigration power to the president!!! Article 1 section 8 grants congress the power to "establish a uniform rule of naturalization".

Do you really expect to get away with such blatant lying???

The constitution does not delegate to the federal government power over immigration, ONLY naturalization.

[h=3]Section 9[/h][FONT=&quot]1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.[/FONT]

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

The constitution does not delegate to the federal government power over immigration, ONLY naturalization.

[h=3]Section 9[/h][FONT="]1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.[/FONT]

Yes - that granted the STATES not the president some say-so on immigration. THINK

 

[Irish]

How can a president give millions of criminal invaders a certificate saying they are free to live here and work here even though the LAW says they can do neither???

Why isn't that obstruction of justice???

If their culture and countries are so great, like libs tell us, why don't they go back their?

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

If their culture and countries are so great, like libs tell us, why don't they go back their?

What a stupid fuck
Lol!

Poor stupid Irish

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

If their culture and countries are so great, like libs tell us, why don't they go back their?

The only advanced countries are america, australia, canada and the countries of europe. They are white. All non-white countries are dumps

But libs tell us white supremacy is false.

 

[Bill]

Is he a man of his word??

Or will the RINOs have this one??

 

[dukkha]

so called "prosecutorial discretion"- except when it effects 100k -it's more like improper legislating. ..except..

Congress won't do anything at all, so naturally the executive gloms up that power..

DC is seriously null and void of an ability/desire to govern

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

so called "prosecutorial discretion"- except when it effects 100k -it's more like improper legislating. ..except..

"Prosecutorial discretion" is the wrong phrase. You can't give people a CERTIFICATE telling them they can break the law. It's brazen obstruction of justice. What obama did was lawlessness on a scale america has never seen before.