What is the GOP thinking?

blackascoal said:
Complete and total delusion .. no disrespect intended.

.. and you think democrats should have listened to you. :0)

You voted for Trump .. what Single-Payer plan is he pushing?

Obviously you don't care as much about Single-Payer nor healthcare for all as you claim .. no disrespect intended.
Click to expand...
you just won't get it. If Hillary had lost to Bernie we'd be talking about phasing out insurance companies now.
Do you agree?
Bernie would have beaten Trump ( by all;polls) and we'd have him leading the agenda.

For some strange reason you can't comprehend this simple idea - nominating Clinton cost Bernie the nomination and therefore and the Dem's the election..

That's tthe source of why Trump is in power, and why the Dems's are in a resistance mode,
and why we have no SP for the foreseeable future.Get that basic idea thru your head!

I care about SP -it;'s a main reason I supported Bernie. That doesn't mean i'm not down with MAGA
or getting rid of establishment politics. Bernie was my first choice. Trump was 2nd.

Hillary was and remains nowhere but some cry babying " the Russians/Comey stole the election."
and shes still wailing away.

Your distatse at me,and Trump voters in general is blinding you to the fact of #NeverHillary was the organizing idea.
 
Wow - are Trump supporters still using "MAGA"?

I guess for the super-rich. I swear, if you had slept through history and all you saw was the last few months, you would think that the wealthy have been the most disadvantaged group in society, because the party in power is doing everything they can to help them out.
 
Thing1 said:
Link you to facts?
Click to expand...

No liar; link me to the idiotic claims you made here about percentages.

Thing1 said:
Got amnesia? Forget about the greatest prosperity we ever had in the '90's?
Click to expand...

Got stupid? Forget that Clinton lost the Congress after three decades of Democratic dominance, Republicans balancing the budget and the dot com boom? Only gullible ignorant idiots credit the philandering BillyBob Clinton with a booming economy.

Thing1 said:
Or the stock market tripling under Obama?
Click to expand...

You're right about that; the ONLY beneficiaries of the failed Obama recovery and massive deficit spending were wealthy Wall Street Bankers. For the rest, not so much.

Moron.

Thing1 said:
No worries. American voters will remember.
Click to expand...

Yep; which is why Democrats have been losing since the BillyBob philandering presidency.

But brain dead lying leftist twits like you still think the Party of the Jackass is winning. Now THAT is funny!

:rofl2:
 
anatta said:
you just won't get it. If Hillary had lost to Bernie we'd be talking about phasing out insurance companies now.
Do you agree?
Bernie would have beaten Trump ( by all;polls) and we'd have him leading the agenda.

For some strange reason you can't comprehend this simple idea - nominating Clinton cost Bernie the nomination and therefore and the Dem's the election..

That's tthe source of why Trump is in power, and why the Dems's are in a resistance mode,
and why we have no SP for the foreseeable future.Get that basic idea thru your head!

I care about SP -it;'s a main reason I supported Bernie. That doesn't mean i'm not down with MAGA
or getting rid of establishment politics. Bernie was my first choice. Trump was 2nd.

Hillary was and remains nowhere but some cry babying " the Russians/Comey stole the election."
and shes still wailing away.

Your distatse at me,and Trump voters in general is blinding you to the fact of #NeverHillary was the organizing idea.
Click to expand...

OK, I'm done .. you win.

Your Hillary delusion is just to overwhelming for me to discuss this issue with you.
 
anatta said:
you just won't get it. If Hillary had lost to Bernie we'd be talking about phasing out insurance companies now.
Do you agree?
Bernie would have beaten Trump ( by all;polls) and we'd have him leading the agenda.

For some strange reason you can't comprehend this simple idea - nominating Clinton cost Bernie the nomination and therefore and the Dem's the election..

That's tthe source of why Trump is in power, and why the Dems's are in a resistance mode,
and why we have no SP for the foreseeable future.Get that basic idea thru your head!

I care about SP -it;'s a main reason I supported Bernie. That doesn't mean i'm not down with MAGA
or getting rid of establishment politics. Bernie was my first choice. Trump was 2nd.

Hillary was and remains nowhere but some cry babying " the Russians/Comey stole the election."
and shes still wailing away.

Your distatse at me,and Trump voters in general is blinding you to the fact of #NeverHillary was the organizing idea.
Click to expand...

The topic of this thread is the future, not the past, fool.
Is that too difficult for you to comprehend?
 
anatta said:
you just won't get it. If Hillary had lost to Bernie we'd be talking about phasing out insurance companies now.
Do you agree?
Bernie would have beaten Trump ( by all;polls) and we'd have him leading the agenda.
Click to expand...

Bernie would have lost by greater margins than Hitlery; which is why the Party of the Jackass had to CHEAT in order to drag Hillary's sorry tired ass across the finish line.

The notion that this nation is ready to elect a leftist socialist idiot like Bernie defies reality or common sense.
 
christiefan915 said:
Comment on the large type sentence. The Repubs started out with 17 candidates. Any one of them was better than trump. The GOP hated trump from the get-go yet they weren't able to put a stop to the train wreck. So I fail to see why Hillary should be blamed for what the GOP itself couldn't do.
Click to expand...
I liked Trump because he wasn't the establishment. I liked Bernie better because of SP and income inequality, but I also like the ideas of MAGA.

To the bolded above: you need to know this was a "change" election,and we have no confidence of change coming from any of the swamp monsters already in DC -Republican or Democrat.
It's gotta come from the people ( populism)

now can Trump do that? I dunno. it's a tall order, but that was his message.
I know for sure Clinton was more of the same, coupled with all the nasty baggage she had/has.
i.e. = Corporatist/big donor driven,warmongering serial liar. (etc.)
 
anatta said:
I liked Trump because he wasn't the establishment. I liked Bernie better because of SP and income inequality, but I also like the ideas of MAGA.

To the bolded above: you need to know this was a "change" election,and we have no confidence of change coming from any of the swamp monsters already in DC -Republican or Democrat.
It's gotta come from the people ( populism)

now can Trump do that? I dunno. it's a tall order, but that was his message.
I know for sure Clinton was more of the same, coupled with all the nasty baggage she had/has.
i.e. = Corporatist/big donor driven,warmongering serial liar. (etc.)
Click to expand...

Trump isn't "establishment"?

Yikes.
 
Thing1 said:
Wow - are Trump supporters still using "MAGA"?

I guess for the super-rich. I swear, if you had slept through history and all you saw was the last few months, you would think that the wealthy have been the most disadvantaged group in society, because the party in power is doing everything they can to help them out.
Click to expand...

Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg
 
Rune said:
The topic of this thread is the future, not the past, fool.
Is that too difficult for you to comprehend?
Click to expand...

Isn't that like a lying liberal dunce; thinking that one has nothing to learn from the past or that the past cannot predict what might occur in the future.

Moron.
 
Thing1 said:
Trump isn't "establishment"?
Click to expand...
he didn't campaign that way. But as I said overcoming the swamp monsters is a tall order.
Maybe if the Dems got out of 'resistance mode' and stopped listening to Schumer et all ( swamp monsters)
they could re-shape the dynamics.

But the Dem's lost their collective minds with Trump Derangement Syndrome -effectively ceding the agenda
except for pure obstructionism..

Trump is going to go wherever he can with anybody to advance his agenda,if the Dem's won't play,
then he has no place else to go but back to partisan politics
 
anatta said:
he didn't campaign that way. But as I said overcoming the swamp monsters is a tall order.
Maybe if the Dems got out of resistance mode and stopped listening to Schumer et all they could re-shape the dynamics.

But the Dem's lost their collective minds with Trump Derangement Syndrome -effectively ceding the agenda
except for pure obstructionism..

Trump is going to go wherever he can with anybody to advanee his agenda,if the Dem's won't play,
then he has no place else to go but back to partisan politics
Click to expand...

Yeah, keep blaming the Dems.
 
Thing1 said:
Yeah, keep blaming the Dems.
Click to expand...
not at all what I'm saying,,you have a partisan mind.
I'm saying if they don't want to play -and Trump isn't all that ideological-
then they are shutting themselves out of shaping the agenda.

Obstructionism feels good. but it cedes working for change, and we've seen Trump try to bring in Dems for HC.
They won't do it. They prefer talk like "racism" and "Manchurian candidate.
So they marginalize themselves
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top