What if the Government Made a List of Authors that cannot be published?

Jarod said:
So? You need a court ruling to see a violation of the 1st Amendment? The DeSantis case is currently in court, but its pretty clear to me. Not to you?
Click to expand...

no...we need a court ruling to stop it......did any court find that DeSantis violated the 1st Amendment.....as I recall no one agreed with you about DeSantis....
 
Jarod said:
True, but once given, the government cannot remove that advantage for the express reason that they publicly disagreed with the governor.

DeSantis was governor for 5 years before he did this and told them it was for having disagreed with his "dont say gay" rule.
Click to expand...

more lies.....there was no "don't say gay" rule......why do you try to say apples and horse turds are equal?.....
 
Jarod said:
Oh, Jarod, I am sorry I said your version was "deliberate fantasy." I was wrong...


Said Damocles never!
Click to expand...

so far he isn't wrong.......there have been no findings by any federal court that there is a prima facie showing of a violation of the 1st amendment in Disney's case.......in Missouri v Biden, there was....
 
Jarod said:
But Damocles gets upset when a Democrat does it.
Click to expand...

and you always have to make up a claim that Republicans do the same......the difference between you is that the federal courts agreed with Damo......so far there is no indication a federal court agrees with you........
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
While a lower court did rule on this, this is not a settled case, NOT YET, SO HOLD YOUR TATORS!

Let's go over where the issue stands.

The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday temporarily put on hold an order restricting the ability of President Joe Biden's administration to encourage social media companies to remove content it considers misleading, dangerous, or harmful to the public, including comments made about the COVID-19 pandemic.

The president's priority No. 1 is to keep Americans safe!

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito, TOTALLY OWNED- BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY- AND NOW IS AN OPERATIVE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY, acting for the court, issued an order freezing a lower court's decision finding that federal officials had likely violated the free speech protections of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment by coercing social media platforms into censoring certain posts.

COERCING MY ASS, as all the Biden Administration asked from the media- is to be more responsible in their News casts and communications!

THAT- IN NO WAY- VIOLATES THE 1st AMENDMENT! WHAT A BUNCH OF RECKLESS MORONS TO EVEN SUGGEST!

Alito's order pauses the lower court's decision ONLY up to Sept. 22!

Alito, conveniently, is the justice designated by the court to act on certain matters arising from a group of states that include Louisiana, where the lawsuit was first filed. AND OH HOW CONVENIENTLY FOR THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY, I MIGHT ADD!

The court's action comes after Biden's administration earlier on Thursday asked the court to put the lower court's order on hold while it prepares a formal appeal. AND A FORMAL APPEAL WILL BE FORTHCOMING!

The reckless ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals came in litigation against the administration by the Republican attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana and a group of social media users. The administration called the decision "startling," saying it would interfere with how the White House, FBI and health officials address matters of public concern and security.

SO I would not break out any bottles of Champagne just yet TRUMPTARDS, as the matter has not been ADDRESSED BY THE FULL SUPREME COURT!

We'll see if it will be legal or allowed for someone to run through a crowded theater and scream FIRE just for thrills!

This is what JOSH HAWLEY WANTS TO SEE PROTECTED! AND IT WILL NOT FLY! TRUST ME!

ANd BTW, this has very little to do with the CONSPIRACY THEORIES during the pandemic!

NO! THIS HAS TO DO WITH DONALD TRUMP USING MEDIA PLATFORMS TO GIN UP HIS WHACKO'ED TERRORISTS INTO ATTACKING JUDGES, JURIES, POLITICIANS, AND LAW OFFICIALS!

NO WAY IS THE SUPREME COURT GOING TO VOTE YES ON SOMETHING THAT COULD LEAD TO GETTING THEIR OWN THROATS CUT! :palm::thinking:
Click to expand...

injunctions are issued based upon a decision there is prima facie evidence.....that means the judge finds the claim not conclusive but credible......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top