What if its not terrorism?

Darth Hussein Omar said:
Where's the voice call though?
Click to expand...

the who?......the only comment made was that if there was a fire under the lavatory, which was reported, it could have damaged the rudder control.....that has nothing to do with any other evidence or the conclusions you draw from them......questions like yours are why I criticized Jarod for saying that Fox claimed it was "likely" a mechanical failure, because they clearly and intentionally stated that they were NOT claiming they had any evidence of what caused the accident......merely that an expert investigating the accident had made the comment that they knew there had been a fire under the lavatory and that this was where the rudder controls passed through the floor.......the precise comment was "this is the first indication we have had giving a logical explanation of what MIGHT have caused the accident"........and of course it still says nothing about what might have caused the fire in the first place.....
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
the who?......the only comment made was that if there was a fire under the lavatory, which was reported, it could have damaged the rudder control.....that has nothing to do with any other evidence or the conclusions you draw from them......questions like yours are why I criticized Jarod for saying that Fox claimed it was "likely" a mechanical failure, because they clearly and intentionally stated that they were NOT claiming they had any evidence of what caused the accident......merely that an expert investigating the accident had made the comment that they knew there had been a fire under the lavatory and that this was where the rudder controls passed through the floor.......the precise comment was "this is the first indication we have had giving a logical explanation of what MIGHT have caused the accident"........and of course it still says nothing about what might have caused the fire in the first place.....
Click to expand...

I'm only saying a lack of communication from the cockpit points away from mechanical failure. Unless it was sudden---and epic, mechanical failure, but the plane was in the air long enough to fly erratically. So that's out.

I'm not making a prediction. I'll leave that to Trump lol.
 
Legion Troll said:
Is that what you think the Counselor said, Ralph? :palm:
Click to expand...

No....I just drafted it as a deflection that I can crawdad away from and boldly say, nope that's not what I said clearly you have taken it out of context, "....I was under fire in Bosnia and rushed to cover without once stopping to talk to that little girl or reviewing the troops, It was pure hell being in combat...." :) -- Sir Hillary, I learn from the best.....I enjoy fishing for large mouthed suckers, all one needs is the correct bait. String a conservative up in the sun (or even a Rhino like trumpet) spray a little left wing stink bait on it so as not to scare off the big mouths....troll just a little down the left side of the river...and bingo, even the thought of having a conservative approach their nest is like introducing a spring lizard into a nest of gestating fry fish.....the HATE generates emotion and the strike comes before the lefty considers the result of attack based upon assumption and emotion. :good4u:

Before you know it.....you have a lefty attempting to tell you what you think I said...when clearly...no one expected a lefty to comprehend any cognition to logic or reason....That's what I think I said...very clearly with no ambiguity whatsoever. :whoa:

Conservatives...even pretend conservatives are more of a threat to you liberals than Islamic terrorists....this thread demonstrates that FEAR. Leftys always attack what they fear.

But I regress....just where did you get your Phd in thought policing? Hate Speech "U"? Politically Correct State? Or the University of MSNBC?
 
Last edited:
Ralph said:
No....I just drafted it as a deflection that I can crawdad away from.....I enjoy fishing for large mouthed suckers, all one needs is the correct bait. String a conservative in the sun spray a little left wing stink bait on it so as not to scare off the big mouths....troll just a little down the left side of the river...and bingo, even the thought of having a conservative approach their nest is like introducing a spring lizard into a nest of gestating fry fish.....the HATE generates emotion and the strike comes before the lefty considers the result of attack based upon assumption and emotion.
Click to expand...

OK, Gomie.
 
Ralph said:
No....I just drafted it as a deflection that I can crawdad away from and boldly say, nope that's not what I said clearly you taken it out of context, "....I was under fire in Bosnia and rushed to cover without once stopping to talk to that little girl or reviewing the troops, It was pure hell being in combat...." :) -- Sir Hillary, I learn from the best.....I enjoy fishing for large mouthed suckers, all one needs is the correct bait. String a conservative in the sun spray a little left wing stink bait on it so as not to scare off the big mouths....troll just a little down the left side of the river...and bingo, even the thought of having a conservative approach their nest is like introducing a spring lizard into a nest of gestating fry fish.....the HATE generates emotion and the strike comes before the lefty considers the result of attack based upon assumption and emotion. :good4u:
Click to expand...

I don't know much about large mouths but smallies will stack up on a current break every time. I'll throw tubes at them or maybe a big jerk bait if musky are around.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
is that what you call correcting liberal's mistakes?......
Click to expand...

And where exactly did you do that, hack?

You're the most unprincipled hack on here. All Trump is to you is the "not Hillary."

Doesn't matter what they find on this one. Trump was an idiot to come out rashly and say it was "100%" terrorism, before we know anything. An idiot, and a stupid excuse for a leader. And you're voting for him.

Apologize some more, hack.
 
Thing1 said:
And where exactly did you do that, hack?

You're the most unprincipled hack on here. All Trump is to you is the "not Hillary."

Doesn't matter what they find on this one. Trump was an idiot to come out rashly and say it was "100%" terrorism, before we know anything. An idiot, and a stupid excuse for a leader. And you're voting for him.

Apologize some more, hack.
Click to expand...

You really like the word hack, don't you?
 
latest

It could be gremlins Donald?
 
Thing1 said:
And where exactly did you do that, hack?

You're the most unprincipled hack on here. All Trump is to you is the "not Hillary."

Doesn't matter what they find on this one. Trump was an idiot to come out rashly and say it was "100%" terrorism, before we know anything. An idiot, and a stupid excuse for a leader. And you're voting for him.

Apologize some more, hack.
Click to expand...

Win lose or draw this will be forgotten about by June lol. By then it will be the next Big Issue.
 
Jarod said:
So, the Paris to Cairo flight that crashed has an unknown cause at this time, but Dangerous Donald went out last night screaming about how it was terrorism and basically calling anyone who thought otherwise stupid.

Now, I suspect from what we know that it was terrorism, but is it really the right thing to do to go off half cocked calling it terrorism before we have solid evidence of it?

The fact is that ISIS has always claimed responsibility for things they do within hours of the event, they have not done so with this jet. In fact nobody creditable has done so, and terrorists usually do, it furthers their cause to claim it. As the hours tick bye, the possibility grows that its not terrorism.

My question becomes, if its not terrorism, will that further HRC's argument that Dangerous Donald is a loose cannon?

Remember we invaded Iraq on such loose assumptions!
Click to expand...
What if Trump is a loose canon? What's this "what if?" shit Jarod?

Sometimes I worry about you. LOL
 
Jarod said:
I do care, that is why I supported BHO over HRC and one of the reasons I supported Sanders over HRC.

Dangerous Donald supported the war also, now he lies and says he did not. I would prefer someone who owns up to her mistake to someone who simply lies about his mistake.
Click to expand...
Specious reasoning Jarod. Trump wasn't in a position to affect those events. As a Senator Clinton was and we both know she made her decision as a political calculation to protect herself politically and not on what was the right thing to do. Is Trump a hypocrit? Sure but let's not make a paragon of Clinton on this issue.
 
Milagro said:
Planes very rarely fall out of the sky especially when the weather is fine and clear. So it is either a suicide pilot or terrorism. I am putting my money on terrorism.
Click to expand...
actually most planes crash due to a complex combination of events that include human error, weather, mechanical failure and very rarely from terrorism.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
actually most planes crash due to a complex combination of events that include human error, weather, mechanical failure and very rarely from terrorism.
Click to expand...

Yes I am aware of that, but how many crashes occur on a fine day in level flight without any distress messages from the cockpit crew? It looks like there was a fire in the toilet as to why is still not certain. In answer to the question of how many crashes are caused by sabotage, well it is around 9%.

http://www.planecrashinfo.com/cause.htm
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top