What if its not terrorism?

So, the Paris to Cairo flight that crashed has an unknown cause at this time, but Dangerous Donald went out last night screaming about how it was terrorism and basically calling anyone who thought otherwise stupid.

Now, I suspect from what we know that it was terrorism, but is it really the right thing to do to go off half cocked calling it terrorism before we have solid evidence of it?

The fact is that ISIS has always claimed responsibility for things they do within hours of the event, they have not done so with this jet. In fact nobody creditable has done so, and terrorists usually do, it furthers their cause to claim it. As the hours tick bye, the possibility grows that its not terrorism.

My question becomes, if its not terrorism, will that further HRC's argument that Dangerous Donald is a loose cannon?

Remember we invaded Iraq on such loose assumptions!

Hillary voted for the war and many Democrats said exactly the same things Bush said about Iraq that you only call lies when a Republican says them.
 
what if what trump is proved to be true? Will you hail Trump?

Again, no. Do you have a reading comprehension problem.

I will not hail Dangerous Donald simply because he guessed correctly. Its the guessing that I think was reckless, not the chance that he might be correct.

A broken clock is correct twice a day, do you hail a broken clock?
 
Again, no. Do you have a reading comprehension problem.

I will not hail Dangerous Donald simply because he guessed correctly. Its the guessing that I think was reckless, not the chance that he might be correct.

A broken clock is correct twice a day, do you hail a broken clock?

Yet Obama can lie about healthcare and you'll bend yourself into a pretzel to defend him and kiss his ass.
 
I complained, but if you remember he tried to back the red line up, Congress refused.
he didn't need Congressional authority - if he didn't for Libya, why would he need it for Syria?
All he had to do was call it "kinetic military action"- like Libya.
 
He said it was 100%. I don't know what you were listening to.

It's a pretty big contrast. Hillary & most gave measured responses. Trump shot from the hip.

What about John Kerry? Remember, he's one of those that voted for a war resolution and for whom you voted despite saying you wouldn't vote for someone that did.
 
What about John Kerry? Remember, he's one of those that voted for a war resolution and for whom you voted despite saying you wouldn't vote for someone that did.

Oh, you mean the situation where I didn't have a time machine, so I couldn't tell my '04 self that my '16 self had decided he was fed up w/ voting for the lesser of 2 evils, so "flip flopped" because I couldn't conduct communication into the past?

That weird thing you keep bringing up as though it's some sort of gotcha? That, CFM?

LOL
 
Again, no. Do you have a reading comprehension problem.

I will not hail Dangerous Donald simply because he guessed correctly. Its the guessing that I think was reckless, not the chance that he might be correct.

A broken clock is correct twice a day, do you hail a broken clock?

how do you know it was a guess? D:
 
He said it was 100%. I don't know what you were listening to.

It's a pretty big contrast. Hillary & most gave measured responses. Trump shot from the hip.

Trump goes way out on a limb. Trumptards see him as a tree surgeon.
LOL
 
Last edited:
Back
Top