What happens if trump fires Mueller &/or Rosenstein??

Bill

Malarkeyville
Some how I don't detect much of a bite in her wimpy barking(watch the clip).. If he fires them what is she gonna do about it?? Anyone going to do about it??


(CNN)California Sen. Dianne Feinstein is uniquely situated at the center of the ongoing probe into Russia's involvement in the 2016 election as she sits on both the Senate intelligence and judiciary committees. (She is the highest-ranking Democrat on the judiciary committee.) Feinstein's centrality to all of this means that when she talks, we would do well to listen.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's rise: How one badass woman fought to keep going
And, man, did she have something to say Friday. Here's her full statement on President Donald Trump's latest tweets about the special counsel investigation being led by former FBI Director Bob Mueller:
"I'm growing increasingly concerned that the President will attempt to fire not only Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating possible obstruction of justice, but also Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein who appointed Mueller.
"The message the President is sending through his tweets is that he believes the rule of law doesn't apply to him and that anyone who thinks otherwise will be fired. That's undemocratic on its face and a blatant violation of the President's oath of office.
"First of all, the President has no authority to fire Robert Mueller. That authority clearly lies with the attorney general—or in this case, because the attorney general has recused himself, with the deputy attorney general. Rosenstein testified under oath this week that he would not fire Mueller without good cause and that none exists.

"And second, if the President thinks he can fire Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and replace him with someone who will shut down the investigation, he's in for a rude awakening. Even his staunchest supporters will balk at such a blatant effort to subvert the law.:rolleyes:

"It's becoming clear to me that the President has embarked on an effort to undermine anyone with the ability to bring any misdeeds to light, be that Congress, the media or the Justice Department. The Senate should not let that happen. We're a nation of laws that apply equally to everyone, a lesson the President would be wise to learn."

Just a few lines worth reading again:
* "The message the President is sending through his tweets is that he believes the rule of law doesn't apply to him."
* "If the President thinks he can fire Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and replace him with someone who will shut down the investigation, he's in for a rude awakening."
* "It's becoming clear to me that the President has embarked on an effort to undermine anyone with the ability to bring any misdeeds to light."
* "We're a nation of laws that apply equally to everyone, a lesson the President would be wise to learn."
Any one of those lines is a 99-mile-an-hour fastball thrown way, way inside. Taken all altogether, it's a statement very clearly designed to send a message to Trump.

That message? Enough! Time to start acting like a president.
To be clear: Feinstein is a Democrat. She represents one of the most Democratic states in the country and risks absolutely nothing, politically speaking, by issuing a statement like this one that blisters Trump.

But she is also one of the institutions in the Senate, having spent the last 25 years in the chamber. Unlike her longtime colleague Barbara Boxer, who retired in 2016, Feinstein is not seen as terribly partisan and generally enjoys strong across-the-aisle relationships.
Of his relationship with Feinstein, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told Roll Call newspaper in February:
"Every conversation that I've had with her now that she's ranking member has been not only friendly, but has been productive, and these little heads-to-heads that you see us having when the committee's actually functioning, work things out right then."

In short: Feinstein isn't just a predictable partisan or someone who pops off at the slightest political provocation. This statement is a purposeful attempt to make clear that Trump has crossed a line and that he needs to take one big step back.

My prediction: He won't.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politics/dianne-feinstein-trump/index.html Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large
Updated 3:04 PM ET, Fri June 16, 2017
 
How did the Saturday Night Massacre effect Nixon?

It would largely kill his agenda, ain't going to be a lot to Republicans who are going to run to the President's side knowing the criticisms that will follow preceding 2018
 
They both need to recuse themselves. If they were honorable men.

That's bogus, both men share honorable reputations, and if any party at all had a reason to level suspicion it would be the Democrats given both men have a Republican past

your just buying the Don's paranoia

 
That's bogus, both men share honorable reputations, and if any party at all had a reason to level suspicion it would be the Democrats given both men have a Republican past

your just buying the Don's paranoia


"Your" just buying into the corrupt, hateful, and murderous liberals.
 
I dunno if that will happen w/ the gop running the show??

I believe Feinstein is wrong, they will not even balk moreles abandon him no matter how blatant it is...
 
Yea, that's the stupid part, stupider than the usaual stupid.:palm:

Is he trying to outplay niXon??

IMHO his base will stick w/ him no matter what, & I mean that in the most extreme way, but there is no reason to fire anyone~if you aint got anything to hide.......

It would be nice if we had a president that was doing the ppl's work, & not working out his insecurities on the world stage..
 
Yea, that's the stupid part, stupider than the usaual stupid.:palm:

Is he trying to outplay niXon??

IMHO his base will stick w/ him no matter what, & I mean that in the most extreme way, but there is no reason to fire anyone~if you aint got anything to hide.......

It would be nice if we had a president that was doing the ppl's work, & not working out his insecurities on the world stage..

He's actually doing quite a bit of work but it's hard to knock Russia and these fruitless investigations off the news cycle.

But there's a subtle political point democrats are overlooking. You're right that Trump's base won't abandon him. And there's the rabid anti-Trumpers who wouldn't vote for him if he cured cancer.

Who does that leave? People who are so/so about Trump and/or aren't wishing and hoping these investigations finally yield something that can be used to get rid of Trump or impede his agenda.

Democrats are in danger with this group. Especially, if something palpable doesn't come out soon because it's increasingly looking like a political witch hunt.
 
As Rosenstein pointed out, Rump can't fire Muller, only Rosenstein can... and he said that if Rump pressures him to do so, he would refuse.
 
Yea, that's the stupid part, stupider than the usaual stupid.:palm:

Is he trying to outplay niXon??

IMHO his base will stick w/ him no matter what, & I mean that in the most extreme way, but there is no reason to fire anyone~if you aint got anything to hide.......

It would be nice if we had a president that was doing the ppl's work, & not working out his insecurities on the world stage..


"if you aint got anything to hide...."

Bingo!
 
He's actually doing quite a bit of work but it's hard to knock Russia and these fruitless investigations off the news cycle.

But there's a subtle political point democrats are overlooking. You're right that Trump's base won't abandon him. And there's the rabid anti-Trumpers who wouldn't vote for him if he cured cancer.

Who does that leave? People who are so/so about Trump and/or aren't wishing and hoping these investigations finally yield something that can be used to get rid of Trump or impede his agenda.

Democrats are in danger with this group. Especially, if something palpable doesn't come out soon because it's increasingly looking like a political witch hunt.


If trump had a brain he'd keep his big fat mouth shut and let everything play out, but instead he throws gas on the fire... Every. Single. Day.

He couldn't make himself look guiltier if he tried.
 
If trump had a brain he'd keep his big fat mouth shut and let everything play out, but instead he throws gas on the fire... Every. Single. Day.

He couldn't make himself look guiltier if he tried.

We can count on the orange clown to aid in his own impeachment...
So far he has been helping tremendously...
Every day...
 
He's actually doing quite a bit of work but it's hard to knock Russia and these fruitless investigations off the news cycle.

But there's a subtle political point democrats are overlooking. You're right that Trump's base won't abandon him. And there's the rabid anti-Trumpers who wouldn't vote for him if he cured cancer.

Who does that leave? People who are so/so about Trump and/or aren't wishing and hoping these investigations finally yield something that can be used to get rid of Trump or impede his agenda.

Democrats are in danger with this group. Especially, if something palpable doesn't come out soon because it's increasingly looking like a political witch hunt.

Well he was doing such a good job of it up till now..

Maybe he just needs to wag the dog a bit more, get those media whores salivating for blood??

There is always some ppl somewhere needin killin, right?
 
Well he was doing such a good job of it up till now..

Maybe he just needs to wag the dog a bit more, get those media whores salivating for blood??

There is always some ppl somewhere needin killin, right?

That's what Dem shooter James Hodgkinson said.
 
Back
Top