"What happens at Georgetown Prep, stays at Georgetown Prep"

And an un-American DNC agitator plant, would know all about the FSB; because you have to answer to them.

Explain to me how someone who pretends to be so good with English would make such a simple grammatical error while proclaiming their English-language skills?
 
I have already said that your posts are hypocritical, along with being ironic; but thanks for finally agreeing. :good4u:

It doesn't seem to me that you know what most of the words in this sentence mean.

You're just randomly stringing together words at this point because the supply of words you know is so limited.
 
So in the last several posts, you've used a total of about 50 words. That's it. The same ~50 words used over and over and over.

I'm impressed that your handler taught you how to count; because it isn't really a necessity for un-American DNC agitator plants, like you.
 
You denying your error

You made the error.

You put a comma where there shouldn't be one...on a post where you tried to pretend you're good with the language.

I didn't make any errors. You've made plenty on grammar alone on this thread. Some "English speaker" you are. LOL.
 
She passed a lie detector test.

Your guy refuses to take one.

Pretty obvious why.

That didn't answer the question; but then your training in how to pass as an American, probably didn't spend much time on being truthful.

So now you're saying that a tenured professor, with a PHD, is incapable of lying??
 
You just use the same 75 words over and over because that's the extent of your vocabulary because English isn't your native language.

Once again, seeing as how you have a problem in understanding the written word; it's all an un-American like you, is worth. :D
 
Right. But swearing under oath doesn't change the situation to a court of law. It's not due process. You obviously don't know about due process because you're not an American.

And you still fail to realize that lying in a Congressional hearing is a crime, so your attempt to classify it as a "job interview" is and was a lie. :D
 
No, she reached out to a Democrat representative, who urged her to take a lie detector test.

So right away you're wrong about what happened.

Start over, try again.

For FUCKS sake. How can you guys be trusted to make any rational decisions when you are so monumentally uninformed. How is it that I am more informed than you are?

Here you go fuckstick. Will you admit you are wrong?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/k...on-to-go-public-washington-post-reporter-says

Since you are probably too lazy or too fucking illiterate to understand, I will post the most relevant portion


Emma Brown:

She first reached out to The Washington Post through a confidential tip line that we have. And she — she did that in early July.

That was a point at which Kavanaugh had risen to the short list of Trump's potential Supreme Court nominees, but wasn't yet the nominee. And she reached out and she wanted to speak confidentially. She really wanted to tell somebody what had happened to her, she said, but she wasn't ready to go public.


So let’s review. In July she not only reached out to the democrat but she reached out to the Washington Post.

That pain you feel in your head is pride fuckin wit ya
 
NO! THEY! DON'T!

FFS, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Issuing a ticket isn't due process.

Due process is having a hearing, in a court of law, about that ticket. That's due process.

A police officer doesn't prosecute...PROSECUTORS DO. And where do they prosecute? In a court of law.

You're definitely not an American. Stop pretending.

And Congress can prosecute for lying during a Congressional hearing, so it's not or ever has been just a "job interview". :D
 
Same words again, scattered about in a new sentence. You've reached your English vocabulary peak.

You keep ignoring the FACT, that it's all your worth; but you being an un-American, probably has trouble understand that and it's why you keep repeating yourself. :D
 
Back
Top