What repercussions? Abandoning the War on Terror and bringing our troops home from abroad, is going to have major repercussions, but it's what the Democrats have whined and moaned about for the past decade. You're too stupid to understand the threat from Islamic Jihad, and you have a simplistic and naive world view in general. The only repercussion from not funding a war that we aren't determined to win, is that we save a lot of money not fighting a war we can't win. But this is just like everything else the Liberals touch... Gitmo, Rendition, the Patriot Act... It's a totally unacceptable travesty, until you get into power... then suddenly, it's all justified! You are about the biggest two-faced bastards that ever roamed the face of the Earth, and your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
You bitched for 8 years about the war in Iraq, but now you want to DEFEND the war effort, on the basis there would be "repercussions" if we up and left... well, do you not think there were "repercussions" from 8 years of Liberals tearing down Bush and the war? Do you not think there would have been repercussions if we had allowed Saddam to give alQaeda chemical and biological weapons? Do you not think there will be repercussions when we withdraw our military presence from the middle east entirely? You didn't believe in the war, you don't believe in the War on Terror, you don't believe alQaeda is that much of a threat, you don't think radical Islam is a problem for us.... but you are afraid of repercussions if we leave... does that even make rational sense?