what ever Happened to the right of free assemblage?

wanderingbear said:
the constitution guarantees this right of free assemblage.How come there are so many local laws that violate this civil right?
Click to expand...

Because people dont know their rights.. Theyre not taught them in school, and unless they learn them on their own, they do not know their own rights.

If people dont know what their rights are, there is no way they can defend their rights.
 
Mike Mitrosky said:
Because people dont know their rights.. Theyre not taught them in school, and unless they learn them on their own, they do not know their own rights.

If people dont know what their rights are, there is no way they can defend their rights.
Click to expand...

They also don't seem to be teaching that someones rights stop, when it infringes on the rights of someone else.

With greater freedom, comes greater responsibility.
And they don't seem to be teaching responsibility, either.
 
RStringfield said:
How is that?
Click to expand...

If you don't have borders, then you don't really have a sovereign nation, with a constitution that protects our rights. Especially since people like Wanderingbare, who advocate open borders, tend not to believe in private property, but instead worship the government...
 
T&A said:
If you don't have borders, then you don't really have a sovereign nation, with a constitution that protects our rights. Especially since people like Wanderingbare, who advocate open borders, tend not to believe in private property, but instead worship the government...
Click to expand...

That does not address the question. How is it that an open border policy (not no borders) eliminates property rights?
 
wanderingbear said:
the constitution guarantees this right of free assemblage.How come there are so many local laws that violate this civil right?
Click to expand...
Freedom of assembly has never included right of trespass, just as freedom of speech does not include the right to vandalize (ie: graffiti).

The vast majority of local laws dealing with the issue are to assure the rights of others are not violated by those enjoying the right of assembly.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Because Liberals thought it was a way to cause disruption and to block people from going about their business; therefore laws had to be enacted to reel in the stupid Liberals. :cof1:
Click to expand...

um, no. hell no.

local laws were enacted because communities of a majority bent didn't want to see or hear complaints by the minority political bent. Therefore, like all totalitarian entities, any and all laws possible are crafted to make 'legal' assemblage as difficult as possible, then make 'illegal' assemblage judicially painful.

hooray for powerful government. :321:
 
wanderingbear said:
Thats not what property rights means. Property rights refer to weather or not you own land..
Click to expand...

stop being a moron.

1) property rights apply to anything you OWN, be it land, vehicles, antiques, and even animals.

2)
I dont have any property. Not likely every going to eather. SO property rights are useless more than useless to me. Their a hindrance. Death to property rights!!
Click to expand...
this is the problem with uneducated and apathetic individuals. The belief that since they don't have something and feel that they most likely never will have something, nobody else should have something.
what unadulterated communist bullshit. come and take them, dumbass.

3) If you want to actually TRY to have an intelligent debate about the constitution, rights, and liberty then read the document first. stop relying on your liberal talking points and commentators.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
They also don't seem to be teaching that someones rights stop, when it infringes on the rights of someone else.

With greater freedom, comes greater responsibility.
And they don't seem to be teaching responsibility, either.
Click to expand...

nor do they seem to be teaching people that some things are not called rights, but fears. huge difference.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
um, no. hell no.

local laws were enacted because communities of a majority bent didn't want to see or hear complaints by the minority political bent. Therefore, like all totalitarian entities, any and all laws possible are crafted to make 'legal' assemblage as difficult as possible, then make 'illegal' assemblage judicially painful.

hooray for powerful government. :321:
Click to expand...

Your understanding of this, is BS. :good4u:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top