what economists say about minimum wage raise

It's pretty funny that to Desh now supply-side economics doesn't or basically never existed.

The absurdity of her doing so is indeed comical. I think she just got stuck in a loop saying 'short bus' and since it brought back so many memories of her childhood, she latched on to it.

:legion:
 
fucking liars lie.

your cato and mises and Pauls are all austrians you fucking liars.

Tell us how they differ in philosophy if you claim they are not
 
fucking liars lie.

your cato and mises and Pauls are all austrians you fucking liars.

Tell us how they differ in philosophy if you claim they are not

LMAO... again you fucking retard...

1) Cato... libertarian
2) Pauls... libertarian
3) Mises... of course he is Austrian... how does that make Republicans Austrian?
 
you cant and wont.

because your fucking liars

So Desh... you point to a libertarian think tank, a libertarian politician and you try to pretend that their views are in line with main stream Republicans?

Are you saying that supply side economics has not been the party position of Republicans for the past thirty plus years?
 
they are all Austrian you fucking liar

The point you fucking retard is that they are NOT representative of Republicans in general. Most republicans are supply side... not austrian. You pointing to a libertarian leaning Republican and saying 'see he supports SOME Austrian points therefore ALL Republicans are now Austrian supporters'... is FUCKING RETARDED.
 
your party is fucking doubling down on stupid taintwallow.

eat shit

dear gentle readers... the above is an example of desh's vile nature after she makes an accusation and completely fails to back it up. In other words, dear gentle reader, DESH LIED AGAIN.
 
Desh, why do Democrats lie about Reagan and Republicans supporting supply-side economics?

Desh refuses to answer the above, because she is lying and she knows it. By answering the above she either has to admit that Dems are lying or that she is.

Since desh hates facts and is completely dishonest, there is no way she can address your question.
 
She's a simpleton and you bully her.

No, I address her bullshit. If she is going to spout of nonsense, I am going to call her on it. If she lies, I am going to call her on it. If she cannot back up her claims, I am going to call her on it.

Just as I would you. Funny that if it was you trying to argue with me, no one would call me a 'bully' for it.
 
Back
Top