What do dem blacks got to lose voting for someone yuge like me??

Why would a racist make an appeal to the black or Hispanic community? If Trump's racist support was anything but fringe, why aren't his numbers dropping after the past two week of non-stop appeals to blacks?

And should we judge Hillary by her loony fringe?

By that logic, Democrats can't be racists either because they make appeals to the black and Hispanic community. But seriously, if you consider "what have you got to lose" as an appeal to blacks, your bar for what you consider an appeal is very low.
 
It goes back to 'what do they have to lose'.

Maybe the promise of jobs is an empty promise [only one way to find that out]---but it's a different promise.

Obviously those supporting clinton/dems believe it is a lot, isn't that all that really matters??

If the trumpf offers nothing tangible=no votes
 

Hey, Republican Party. African-American voter here. I hear you've been looking for me, but you're sending out such wildly mixed messages that I'm not sure if I should be flattered or furious.

Hat No. 2 fits me pretty snugly right now. Here's why.

Your national standard-bearer, Donald Trump, is making an explicit appeal for my vote. He came to Charlotte last week and said the Democratic Party plays black voters for suckers while black neighborhoods rot.

"Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party have taken African-American votes totally for granted," he said. "What do you have to lose by trying something new?"

That's a good, fair question. Too bad the guy asking it ranks as the most racially inflammatory presidential candidate since arch-segregationist George Wallace. Instead of making his black-voter sales pitch by talking to us, he's doing it by talking about us to white audiences.

That tells me a hell of a lot more than the words on his Teleprompter do.

It might also help if he acknowledged the fact that most black people aren't poor. Some 26 percent are, according to the University of Michigan's National Poverty Center. And while that's unacceptably high compared with white Americans' poverty rate of 10 percent, that leaves a whopping 74 percent of black Americans above the poverty line.

You wouldn't guess it listening to Trump bellowing away about black despair. Yes, the inner cities clearly need new ideas and more help. But Trump isn't offering either. That's because he's not courting the black vote with this new sales pitch; he's giving cover to embarrassed white supporters who are sick of answering for his racial provocations.

Speaking of which, you GOP elders might want to look in on Dallas Woodhouse, executive director of the N.C. Republican Party. Guy's in no danger of winning an NAACP Image Award right now. He shamelessly urged Republicans sitting on county elections boards to limit early voting hours and keep polling sites closed on Sundays — clear efforts to pinch voting options favored by blacks.

No, no, you say. That's about keeping Democrats from voting. We can't help it if most black voters just happen to be Democrats.

Actually, you can. Blacks vote Democrat today because Democrats fought for their votes. The party that once welcomed cross-burning Klansmen did an about-face on civil rights and earned the black vote.

Are you fighting to get those votes back? Nope.

The path to do so is clear, if you're interested. Embrace affirmative action — and let racist base voters walk. Pass criminal justice reform. Champion black entrepreneurship and the rebuilding of the inner cities. Reach out to churchgoing black families; their traditionalist social values mirror yours.

Even viewed through the lens of small-government conservatism, this agenda is do-able.

You'll lose old voters. And you'll gain new ones. Just as the Democrats did 50 years ago.

In a changing America, you'll be in position to compete for real minority votes, instead of just complaining about imaginary fraudulent ones.

That fraud charge stinks. It's built on the racist presumption that black voters can't discern whose policies align most closely with their interests and worldview. It suggests that, even if they're not literally fraudulent, black votes remain somehow illegitimate because they're votes for free stuff, not for well-considered policies.

OK. Then why did black voters derail Bernie Sanders, the king of free stuff, in the primaries? Why'd they save Hillary Clinton?

Simple. She showed up when he didn't. She out-worked him.

And he didn't realize it until it was too late.

Concerned about black votes this November, GOP?

Quit whining. Stop provoking. Start competing.

ABOUT THE WRITER

Eric Frazier is a columnist for the Charlotte Observer. Readers may email him at efrazier@charlotteobserver.com.

Yes because a leftist blm terrorist was ever going to vote Republican anyways.
 
This isn't trickle down either -well some of it is- but our corporate rate is way too high.

It is, telemarketer?


766_Markets-634.gif
 
By that logic, Democrats can't be racists either because they make appeals to the black and Hispanic community. But seriously, if you consider "what have you got to lose" as an appeal to blacks, your bar for what you consider an appeal is very low.

What have they got to loose? Because the people who they have been voting for havent helped them have they? In fact black anger is way up since Obama took office.
 
It is, telemarketer?


766_Markets-634.gif
that shows the need for tax reform. If the statutory rate is that wacked ouf proportion as to what is payed -
it's showing the Big Corps are making the tax code a priority when considering business decisions.

The whole damn thing is corrupt/inefficient - it needs to be replaced by a graduated flat tax, with perhaps minimal deduction
 
that shows the need for tax reform. If the statutory rate is that wacked ouf proportion as to what is payed -
it's showing the Big Corps are making the tax code a priority when considering business decisions.

The whole damn thing is corrupt/inefficient - it needs to be replaced by a graduated flat tax, with perhaps minimal deduction

there is a rate that small businesses who cannot afford lawyers pay (lets call that paper rate) and the rate big corporations who can afford tax lawyers to exploit the loopholes (lets call that actual rate)

I am in favoring of lowering the paper rate and then closing the loopholes to raise the actual rate.
 
that shows the need for tax reform. If the statutory rate is that wacked ouf proportion as to what is payed - it's showing the Big Corps are making the tax code a priority when considering business decisions. The whole damn thing is corrupt/inefficient - it needs to be replaced by a graduated flat tax, with perhaps minimal deduction

How's that working for the Trump campaign, telemarketer?
 
there is a rate that small businesses who cannot afford lawyers pay (lets call that paper rate) and the rate big corporations who can afford tax lawyers to exploit the loopholes (lets call that actual rate)

I am in favoring of lowering the paper rate and then closing the loopholes to raise the actual rate.

Well now you only need convince the rich in congress & their real constituencies the rich, that it is in their best interests to do so, good luck..
 
What have they got to loose? Because the people who they have been voting for havent helped them have they? In fact black anger is way up since Obama took office.

You should venture into the street and tell black people the error of their ways, coward.

I'll understand if you don't.
 
Back
Top