What A Surprise

I never saw this coming.

Letting the racist cat out of the bag: The Zimmerman family shows its spots

by digby

Do you remember when George Zimmerman's brother emerged last fall to great reviews, saying that his family was not racist and that George had been unfairly tarred as one for the killing of Trayvon Martin? The Orlando Sentinel reported:

Zimmerman's family felt it was time to become more vocal about their multicultural heritage to rebut the charges of racism that have mischaracterized who they are, Zimmerman said to members of the Central Florida chapter of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.

"At the beginning we couldn't speak publicly to the media to defend ourselves against the allegations that we are family of racists and that George is a racist," Zimmerman said in Spanish. "We didn't grow up with racism. We grew up with a Latino mother and white Father. Theirs was an interracial love story."

First of all, the idea that because someone comes from an interracial background they can't possibly be racist is silly. All humans have that capability and in our culture African Americans have most often been the target of racism from people of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. In fact, the right wing has made quite a profit at fomenting resentments among all racial minorities.

But I think this probably clears up any misconceptions. Robert Zimmerman Jr, the brother tweeted this over the week-end:


On Saturday, Zimmerman went on a Twitter tirade against “black teens,” equating the boy killed by his brother with De’Marquise Elkins, the 17-year-old suspect in the murder of a Georgia infant.
As highlighted by Mediaite, Zimmerman tweeted a photo comparison between Elkins and Martin flipping their middle fingers with the caption, “A picture speaks a thousand words…Any questions?”
Zimmerman tweeted the photo at Michael Moore, the NAACP, the NRA, and a Breitbart.com editor. He followed it up with another comparison between the two, tweeting “Teen to West: “Do you want me to shoot your baby?” #TrayvonMartin to #GeorgeZimmerman: You’re gonna die tonight Motherf**ker.”


In case the reason for his comparison of the two young black men was unclear, Zimmerman later tweeted:

1.png



I think this is the perfect illustration of a certain common form of racism that still exists today. I'm sure the Zimmermans don't think of themselves as racists. They just think they are exercising common sense. It's the "fear" that exists in the psyches of those who know, somewhere deep down, that African Americans have a right to be angry and violent about all the terrible things you think about them. And so they assume they all are angry and violent, even when they are just average 17 year old American kids out buying some skittles on a rainy night.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013...tml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
 
It's the "fear" that exists in the psyches of those who know, somewhere deep down, that African Americans have a right to be angry and violent about all the terrible things you think about them. And so they assume they all are angry and violent, even when they are just average 17 year old American kids out buying some skittles on a rainy night.

I dont think this at all. I'm sure they don't either. How [satire]dare[/satire] you assume to be in their head any more than you'd let them be in yours.

On Saturday, Zimmerman went on a Twitter tirade against “black teens,” equating the boy killed by his brother with De’Marquise Elkins, the 17-year-old suspect in the murder of a Georgia infant.

He feels strongly about the boy who attacked his brother and dramaticly altered his family's lifestyle; about the media dragging their name into the mud. He felt strongly about a man pointing a gun at a child as well, I presume. He made a comparison that was most likely not in the best of taste, but racist?
A straw from the haystack.

Have an much less biased news report to balance that blog:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...ns-brother-robert-zimmerman-jr_n_2948210.html
Robert Zimmerman took to the social network on Sunday, sharing a photo of De'Marquis Elkins, a teen charged with the fatal shooting of a 1-year-old in Georgia, and Trayvon Martin flipping the middle finger.

After inevitably starting a conversation around the post, Zimmerman responded to a tweet, challenging the liberal media's coverage of his brother's case and questioning why society thinks "blacks mightB risky."

Of course, some challenged his assertion, saying taking pictures while throwing up the middle finger does not make one dangerous. Zimmerman responded, holding the media accountable for its lack of adequate cover and portrayal of Trayvon Martin and his brother.

And a second.
http://www.newser.com/story/165060/tweet-by-zimmermans-brother-sparks-racial-debate.html
 
It's the "fear" that exists in the psyches of those who know, somewhere deep down, that African Americans have a right to be angry and violent about all the terrible things you think about them. And so they assume they all are angry and violent, even when they are just average 17 year old American kids out buying some skittles on a rainy night.

No one has the right to be violent because of what others may 'think'
 
He made a comparison that was most likely not in the best of taste, but racist?

Yes, it was flamingly racist. Only racists don't know why what he said was racist.
 
I dont think this at all. I'm sure they don't either. How [satire]dare[/satire] you assume to be in their head any more than you'd let them be in yours.



He feels strongly about the boy who attacked his brother and dramaticly altered his family's lifestyle; about the media dragging their name into the mud. He felt strongly about a man pointing a gun at a child as well, I presume. He made a comparison that was most likely not in the best of taste, but racist?
A straw from the haystack.

Have an much less biased news report to balance that blog:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...ns-brother-robert-zimmerman-jr_n_2948210.html


And a second.
http://www.newser.com/story/165060/tweet-by-zimmermans-brother-sparks-racial-debate.html

Lol...since when is Newser balanced?

No one has the right to be violent because of what others may 'think'

Tell that to the KKK.
 
And yet he has support. You would convict Zimmerman based on his brother's twitter account. I maintain he's innocent until proven guilty.
 
Stupid strawman.

yet you did insinuate that the Zimmerman family was a bunch of racists because of one member of the families tweets. We also know that you think George Zimmerman was racist and killed Martin because he was black. So you are attempting to suggest he is guilty based on the tweets of his brother.
 
And yet he has support. You would convict Zimmerman based on his brother's twitter account. I maintain he's innocent until proven guilty.

You should perhaps take some classes in reading comprehension instead of trolling a forum on school days implying words nobody said.
 
So you think people have a right to be violent because of what others think about them?

Thanks for matching Desh's stupidity from yesterday.

1) I didn't write that.

2) It takes a special kind of person to read that entire post, read what Zimmerman wrote, and have that line be their takeaway.
 
A person of one color makes a racist statement because his brother has been treated unfairly due to a racial incident that he feels was grossly unfair towards his brother. I wonder, if a black person called someone "whitey" as a slur because of something similar, would anyone criticize that? What is the difference? Why would one be called up short as racist and the other one not?
 
Tell that to the KKK.

Do you understand the above is yet another example of liberal ignorance on this board?

1) The KKK is not violent because of what others think about them, they are violent because of what they think about others

2) The KKK being a bunch of violent racists doesn't change my opinion that no one has the right to be violent because of what others think of them
 
1) I didn't write that.

2) It takes a special kind of person to read that entire post, read what Zimmerman wrote, and have that line be their takeaway.

Yet when you post stupidity like that and then give the board a 'here is Whitey' comment when that part is challenged, you are endorsing said stupidity.

What else are we to take away from that article? That you wish to condemn the entire Zimmerman family based on the tweets of one person? Yeah, I already addressed that stupidity as well.

Care to make any other ignorant comments?
 
yet you did insinuate that the Zimmerman family was a bunch of racists because of one member of the families tweets. We also know that you think George Zimmerman was racist and killed Martin because he was black. So you are attempting to suggest he is guilty based on the tweets of his brother.

Actually his brother, this brother, was the one who claimed that the zimmerman family isn't racist. His tweets reveal otherwise at least about him. I am not attempting to say that George is guilty based on these tweets. What I am saying is that his brother lied when he said he and his family aren't racists. He is a racist.

Anything else you want to try and deflect from that with?

Do you think the guy who made those tweets is racist?
 
What else are we to take away from that article? ?

Do you remember when George Zimmerman's brother emerged last fall to great reviews, saying that his family was not racist and that George had been unfairly tarred as one for the killing of Trayvon Martin? The Orlando Sentinel reported:

Zimmerman's family felt it was time to become more vocal about their multicultural heritage to rebut the charges of racism that have mischaracterized who they are, Zimmerman said to members of the Central Florida chapter of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.

"At the beginning we couldn't speak publicly to the media to defend ourselves against the allegations that we are family of racists and that George is a racist," Zimmerman said in Spanish. "We didn't grow up with racism. We grew up with a Latino mother and white Father. Theirs was an interracial love story."

That this guy lied. That's what I took away from the article.
 
Back
Top