What a pedophile looks like

ThailandFarang1.jpg


Too harsh?
 
God bless America said:
I cannot concur with the crucifixion of this campaigning Christian candidate considering the counter-factual, convenient claims of canoodling which could be complete calumnies.

Caution commands corroboration, confession or criminal conviction.
Click to expand...

Moore's confession to Hannity about dating teens while in his thirties corroborates much of the Post's reporting.
Hannity was trying desperately to softball Moore into looking like he was set up by the article .
In the interview Sean, who has a 16 year old daughter himself, was put off by Moore as he backed up many of the Post's allegations saying things like; he got "permission" from the girl's mothers before he "dated" the under-aged teens, who were half his age.
This guy is a fucking creep and a pedophile.
Reduced to defending a pedophile, no republican can look good doing that.
As Mitt put it, "Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal convictions, not elections. I believe Leigh Corfman. Her account is too serious to ignore. Moore is unfit for office and should step aside."
Conviction is the requirement to take away one's freedom... support for person running for public office demands a less severe standard.

If it is corroboration you seek before judging Moore....you need to look no further than Moore's own words.
 
Last edited:
God bless America said:
So you and Mittzie the Mormon multi-millionaire say, Brother Buck.

Let's review:

While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls.

Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women.

All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore.

The women say they don’t know one another.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/national-republican-senatorial-committee-ends-joint-fundraising-agreement-with-roy-moore-campaign/2017/11/10/f393278c-c62e-11e7-84bc-5e285c7f4512_story.html?utm_term=.01bb480b1e9f


"Heard". "Allegedly". "Post reporters contacted and interviewed". "All were initially reluctant to speak publicly". "The women say".

Hearsay? Check. Incredible coincidences? Check. Uncorroborated claims? Check. Lack of evidence? Check? Solicitation of alleged witnesses by hostile media? Check. Politically-convenient timing? Check. Zero criminal charges? Check.

If you wouldn't believe these women...

Paula Jones
Juanita Broaddrick
Kathleen Willey
Eileen Wellstone
Carolyn Moffet
Elizabeth Ward Gracen
Becky Brown
Helen Dowdy
Cristy Zercher

Why would you believe this story?

I think I know why.
Click to expand...

I could throw that right back at you... You are perfectly willing to believe Clinton's accusers without a conviction, but you are willing to defend a creep who admits to dating women half his age even when confronted with sexually predatory allegations...

Partisan politics produces prejudicial opinions even when presented with a preponderance of damning persuasive personal testimony of pedphillia from the past .

Moore is obviously a creep whose biggest asset is his potentially balance-tipping vote for turtle-boy's tax scam that favors the wealthy.
That is why you defend his sexually nefarious character.
If Mcconnell, for sure, had the votes Moore could, and would be thrown under the wheels of his moral high ground bus.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
You are perfectly willing to believe Clinton's accusers without a conviction
Click to expand...

Says who, Brother Buck? I don't recall saying that.

Not only is there no conviction in the Moore "scandal", there are no charges, are there? What crime was committed? Is there a police report? Are there witnesses? Does a verifiable pattern of behavior exist?

Buckly J. Ewer said:
but you are willing to defend a creep who admits to dating women half his age even when confronted with sexually predatory allegations...
Click to expand...

I detest Moore. I detest kangaroo courts and with hunts more. Allegations are not evidence. If they were, Bill and Hillary would have been locked up already, and we both know it.

How can you claim to be impartial if you don't extend a presumption of innocence to everyone, regardless of their politics?

There's no evidence that he "admits to dating women half his age", is there? Dating women half a man's age isn't illegal, as far as I know. You have a moral objection? Have you suddenly gotten religion?

Buckly J. Ewer said:
Partisan politics produces prejudicial opinions even when presented with a preponderance of damning persuasive personal testimony of pedphillia from the past.
Click to expand...

"Damning persuasive personal testimony of pedphillia" (sic)?

I've seen nothing of the sort. I also suggest that you read the definition of pedophilia.

Buckly J. Ewer said:
Moore is obviously a creep whose biggest asset is his potentially balance-tipping vote for turtle-boy's tax scam that favors the wealthy.
Click to expand...

At least you admit your motive for pretending to be outraged by unsubstantiated allegations. It's political. There's not a shred of moralistic belief in you, Brother Buckly, and we both know it. This looks suspiciously like a conveniently-concocted political ploy cooked up by the notoriously partisan WaPo.

Buckly J. Ewer said:
That is why you defend his sexually nefarious character.
Click to expand...

It hasn't been proven that he has a "sexually nefarious character". Has it?

Buckly J. Ewer said:
If Mcconnell, for sure, had the votes Moore could, and would be thrown under the wheels of his moral high ground bus
Click to expand...

Except for the little problem of proof, Brother Buck.

You haven't given a single reason why these women are more credible than Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Eileen Wellstone, Carolyn Moffet, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Becky Brown, Helen Dowdy or Cristy Zercher.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Polls have the race tied up. 46% to 46% Alabamians voting for the Democratic candidate...Priceless...
Click to expand...

Polls. :rofl2:

At least you've unwittingly revealed that the motive for these conveniently-timed hearsay allegations was to gain a political advantage in an election that DEMOCRATS were almost certain to lose.
 
I went on twitter and told her to go kill herself a few times. I feel better now. Rightists are animals and need to be put down like animals.
 
God bless America said:
Says who, Brother Buck? I don't recall saying that.

Not only is there no conviction in the Moore "scandal", there are no charges, are there? What crime was committed? Is there a police report? Are there witnesses? Does a verifiable pattern of behavior exist?



I detest Moore. I detest kangaroo courts and with hunts more. Allegations are not evidence. If they were, Bill and Hillary would have been locked up already, and we both know it.

How can you claim to be impartial if you don't extend a presumption of innocence to everyone, regardless of their politics?

There's no evidence that he "admits to dating women half his age", is there? Dating women half a man's age isn't illegal, as far as I know. You have a moral objection? Have you suddenly gotten religion?



"Damning persuasive personal testimony of pedphillia" (sic)?

I've seen nothing of the sort. I also suggest that you read the definition of pedophilia.



At least you admit your motive for pretending to be outraged by unsubstantiated allegations. It's political. There's not a shred of moralistic belief in you, Brother Buckly, and we both know it. This looks suspiciously like a conveniently-concocted political ploy cooked up by the notoriously partisan WaPo.



It hasn't been proven that he has a "sexually nefarious character". Has it?



Except for the little problem of proof, Brother Buck.

You haven't given a single reason why these women are more credible than Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Eileen Wellstone, Carolyn Moffet, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Becky Brown, Helen Dowdy or Cristy Zercher.
Click to expand...
Will you miss Brother Buck?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top