Were his rights violated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
SmarterThanYou said:
the plain text of whatever law we wish to discuss is irrelevant anymore. when laws are written such that a concealed handgun law includes the words 'in whole, or in part' so that a judge can use that definition to state 'a handgun hanging from someones neck tied by a shoestring is still concealed, because the string conceals that small part', then we might as well scrap the entire penal code. All that happens after that is laws are subjectively applied to prosecute those by choice and not by law.
Click to expand...

Could you provide a link to that ruling? Thanks
 
SmarterThanYou said:
try a bigger picture, lame brain. I know you like to lay your tongue out on the floor for your fellow badges, especially to try to refute me, but I'm very clear in my communications. so when I say 'prosecute', I am referring to prosecutors. Let me know if I need to dumb things down a bit more for you.
Click to expand...

You could try and "smarten" up your comments, instead of expecting everyone to read your mind.
Now go give some lip to your Militia's "members".
 
SmarterThanYou said:
try again, dipshit. if he'd shot up the school, i'd be complaining and bitching that CAMPUS CARRY IS PROHIBITED!!!!!!!!!
see, I prefer to leave police at their desks and doughnuts. they cause less problems that way.
Click to expand...

Your post explains why your eyes are brown.
It's because you're full of shit.

If he had shot up school, you'ld be ranting and raving that the Police didn't prevent this; even after they had all this evidence that he was going to do it.

Your past posts, prove my point and assertion.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Could you provide a link to that ruling? Thanks
Click to expand...
The case is L.M., Jr. v. State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992). The case dealt with 3 minors having a concealed weapon in their car. Their conviction was upheld on appeal.

The justices looked at MS statute for concealed weapons 97-37-1

(1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 45-9-101, any person who carries, concealed in whole or in part, any bowie knife, dirk knife, butcher knife, switchblade knife, metallic knuckles, blackjack, slingshot, pistol, revolver, or any rifle with a barrel of less than sixteen (16) inches in length, or any shotgun with a barrel of less than eighteen (18) inches in length, machine gun or any fully automatic firearm or deadly weapon, or any muffler or silencer for any firearm, whether or not it is accompanied by a firearm, or uses or attempts to use against another person any imitation firearm, shall upon conviction be punished as follows:

Chief Justice Lee, in the concurring opinion, made the remark ("[A] revolver carried in a holster on a man's hip was a partially concealed weapon. Conceivably, carrying a revolver suspended from the neck by a leather throng could be partially concealing it."). This was all it took for even lesser morons to stretch that to it's breaking point and beyond.

http://www.natchezdemocrat.com/2010/03/28/open-carry-gun-laws-trigger-discussion/

Adams County Sheriff Chuck Mayfield said “partially concealed” allows for holstered weapons, since the holster would cover a portion of the gun.

This allows law enforcement in Mississippi to stop anyone they see open carrying and harass them for ID and permit. For serious anti-gun law enforcement, it even lets them lecture them on their 'permit' means only concealed (like their previous partially concealed statement was totally forgotten), and some have even been cited for it. These charges are almost always dismissed before trial so as to ensure that the case law from 1992 isn't overturned, making a holstered openly carried handgun a clearly established right in the state.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Your post explains why your eyes are brown.
It's because you're full of shit.

If he had shot up school, you'ld be ranting and raving that the Police didn't prevent this; even after they had all this evidence that he was going to do it.

Your past posts, prove my point and assertion.
Click to expand...
yeah yeah yeah, us poor little sheeple MUST have our beloved cops to protect us and when they don't, we cry /sarcasm

I don't need your pitiful badge buddies to protect me and I don't need them preventing crime. they should all stick to writing parking tickets.
 
bravo said:

You should have shown some gonads and invested in a gun......and used it.....not only would your home be safer but your entire neighborhood would too.....
Click to expand...

and just what good would that have done as they broke in when my wife and i were at work...and i have a pistol
 
SmarterThanYou said:
The case is L.M., Jr. v. State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992). The case dealt with 3 minors having a concealed weapon in their car. Their conviction was upheld on appeal.

The justices looked at MS statute for concealed weapons 97-37-1

(1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 45-9-101, any person who carries, concealed in whole or in part, any bowie knife, dirk knife, butcher knife, switchblade knife, metallic knuckles, blackjack, slingshot, pistol, revolver, or any rifle with a barrel of less than sixteen (16) inches in length, or any shotgun with a barrel of less than eighteen (18) inches in length, machine gun or any fully automatic firearm or deadly weapon, or any muffler or silencer for any firearm, whether or not it is accompanied by a firearm, or uses or attempts to use against another person any imitation firearm, shall upon conviction be punished as follows:

Chief Justice Lee, in the concurring opinion, made the remark ("[A] revolver carried in a holster on a man's hip was a partially concealed weapon. Conceivably, carrying a revolver suspended from the neck by a leather throng could be partially concealing it."). This was all it took for even lesser morons to stretch that to it's breaking point and beyond.

http://www.natchezdemocrat.com/2010/03/28/open-carry-gun-laws-trigger-discussion/

Adams County Sheriff Chuck Mayfield said “partially concealed” allows for holstered weapons, since the holster would cover a portion of the gun.

This allows law enforcement in Mississippi to stop anyone they see open carrying and harass them for ID and permit. For serious anti-gun law enforcement, it even lets them lecture them on their 'permit' means only concealed (like their previous partially concealed statement was totally forgotten), and some have even been cited for it. These charges are almost always dismissed before trial so as to ensure that the case law from 1992 isn't overturned, making a holstered openly carried handgun a clearly established right in the state.
Click to expand...

Nice that you were able to provide something; but I don't see anything regarding your reference to the "concurring opinion".
 
SmarterThanYou said:
yeah yeah yeah, us poor little sheeple MUST have our beloved cops to protect us and when they don't, we cry /sarcasm

I don't need your pitiful badge buddies to protect me and I don't need them preventing crime. they should all stick to writing parking tickets.
Click to expand...

That was a nice rant, that had nothing at all to do with your ability to wrong with everything; because there was nothing in my post that even suggested what you're stating.

GEE, that would make you a liar; but I digress.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I believe that you took his comment out of context and are afraid of looking foolish, again. :)
Click to expand...

i heard you also believe in santa clause and the tooth fairy. Since you didn't want to follow the post or the case, i'll tell you again that those in MS have followed the judges comment and is applying it in that fashion, I even gave you a direct quote of one of the county sheriffs, but I understand your stupidity tends to confuse me with MS county sheriffs.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
i heard you also believe in santa clause and the tooth fairy. Since you didn't want to follow the post or the case, i'll tell you again that those in MS have followed the judges comment and is applying it in that fashion, I even gave you a direct quote of one of the county sheriffs, but I understand your stupidity tends to confuse me with MS county sheriffs.
Click to expand...

Ergo: You have no link to support your allegation and you did take it out of context. Thanks for clearing that up. :good4u:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top