We need to nominate, then elect Herman Cain!

When someone says... No, I don't like that, and I also don't like this... that IS a DIRECT COMPARISON! What the fuck is wrong with you? Can something BE more obvious? Throughout Islamic teaching, women are less than men, women have less value than men, and women are to be subservient to men, in any and ALL cases, no exceptions, no caveats, no ambiguity, no differing interpretation... it is clear, concise, and consistent throughout the Koran, throughout Sharia, and throughout Islam. Christianity teaches something completely and radically different. Women are NOT valued less than men, the Bible states in several places, they are EQUAL to men in the eyes of God, the Bible NEVER states women are to be subservient, or valued less than men... it's fucking NOT THERE! The OPPOSITE is stated numerous times, in several different books, by several different authors. Yet when it is pointed out that Islam teaches this, YOU MADE THE DIRECT COMPARISON to Christianity, and tried to claim it said the same thing, IT DOESN'T and you were totally schooled on it by a Buddhist.

Now if you just want to be a horses ass and keep arguing, that's fine... go for it Big Boy! I am done here.

I don't like the Oakland Raiders

...also...

I don't like brussel sprouts.

Am I comparing the two?

Anyone else see how completely ludicrous Dixie's statement is?
 
So...SM, how's that Herman Cains thing working out for you now?

I imagine some know-nothing European, with only a passing interest in Republican Presidential nominees, having a superior understanding of your own electoral system must sting somewhat, no?

Luckily, i'm a classy kind of a chap and would never dream of pointing out your utter stupidity. :)

I'm disappointed in him, along with apparently a majority of GOP primary voters who liked him on the ballot. :D
 
Can anyone give me one good reason we shouldn't?

Cain has a record of results-oriented private sector success in business better than anyone in this race, perhaps one of the best of anyone ever to run for president. He is not a career politician, at a time where the electorate finds both political parties, and politicians in general, unsuitable and unpalatable, this would seem to be exactly what we want. His credentials with business are impeccable compared with Romney, he only lacks experience holding political office. So what? Is there suddenly some prerequisite that one must hold political office to obtain political office? Are we saying that someone who has been corrupted by politics for a certain number of years or terms, is somehow a 'better' choice to serve? The ONLY bad mark Cain gets, is for not having enough experience being a politician... but is that really a 'bad' mark?


Disgruntled Libertarians... Defiant Independents... Disenfranchised Conservative Democrats... If ever there is a hope to bust up the GOP establishment, and elect someone who is truly a conservative and believes in Conservatism over Republicanism, this is your man! If ever there is someone who believes in the Constitution and Constitutional roles of government, etc... here is your candidate! If you are realistic enough to understand we aren't going to see an emerging third party, and if we did, they wouldn't be able to effectively govern with a D/R congress... Cain presents a unique chance to revive the founding principles of government by the people.

Finally, there is the issue of race. May as well talk about it, the left plans to attack with it, so let's face reality on this. If John McCain could have picked up the same percentage of black votes as Bush gained in 2000 and 2004, he would have won the election. Cain offers conservatives a unique chance to articulate conservatism to blacks in America, who may otherwise dismiss what the "republican" had to say. It also completely short-circuits the left-wing "racist" allegations, as Cain is actually MORE African-American than Obama. Taking their Race card is HUGE, it is what they use to bludgeon conservatives with 24/7/365... it is their Shield of Deflection for Obama's trail of failed policies, and by extension, their own policies of Liberalism.

Because he is a hypocritical horndog.
 
Personally, i'm looking forward to two chaps, with impossibly ridiculous names, spitting an increasing amount of venom and destroying each others reputations for the next few months.

Although, the Democrats will probably be responsible for it all.

I think that Mitt's hair is real and Newt's isn't. I am hoping it becomes an issue.
 
Can anyone give me one good reason we shouldn't?

Cain has a record of results-oriented private sector success in business better than anyone in this race, perhaps one of the best of anyone ever to run for president. He is not a career politician, at a time where the electorate finds both political parties, and politicians in general, unsuitable and unpalatable, this would seem to be exactly what we want. His credentials with business are impeccable compared with Romney, he only lacks experience holding political office. So what? Is there suddenly some prerequisite that one must hold political office to obtain political office? Are we saying that someone who has been corrupted by politics for a certain number of years or terms, is somehow a 'better' choice to serve? The ONLY bad mark Cain gets, is for not having enough experience being a politician... but is that really a 'bad' mark?

Disgruntled Libertarians... Defiant Independents... Disenfranchised Conservative Democrats... If ever there is a hope to bust up the GOP establishment, and elect someone who is truly a conservative and believes in Conservatism over Republicanism, this is your man! If ever there is someone who believes in the Constitution and Constitutional roles of government, etc... here is your candidate! If you are realistic enough to understand we aren't going to see an emerging third party, and if we did, they wouldn't be able to effectively govern with a D/R congress... Cain presents a unique chance to revive the founding principles of government by the people.

Finally, there is the issue of race. May as well talk about it, the left plans to attack with it, so let's face reality on this. If John McCain could have picked up the same percentage of black votes as Bush gained in 2000 and 2004, he would have won the election. Cain offers conservatives a unique chance to articulate conservatism to blacks in America, who may otherwise dismiss what the "republican" had to say. It also completely short-circuits the left-wing "racist" allegations, as Cain is actually MORE African-American than Obama. Taking their Race card is HUGE, it is what they use to bludgeon conservatives with 24/7/365... it is their Shield of Deflection for Obama's trail of failed policies, and by extension, their own policies of Liberalism.

Well, in any event....that won't be happening. LOL.
 
Back
Top