"We keep marrying other species and ethnics " - Fox News Host

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

LOL

Racism is just a different viewpoint, Mottley! It's like you want to take your viewpoint of anti-racism and make it law!

No, racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another. Viewpoints not based on that belief, are NOT racist, they can't be racist because THAT is what racism is!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Dixie quote: My God people! You act like Kilmeade came onto the set dressed as Hitler, and pontificated about the virtues of Nazism all day! He made an off-the-cuff remark! He wasn't ADVOCATING racial purity! He wasn't SUGGESTING we would be better off if we practiced racial purity! He made a somewhat valid observation regarding the health care debate, and the irrelevant point the left keeps throwing up about Scandinavian health care! Anyone with half a brain should be able to understand, it is not RACIST to say that Scandinavian people tend to marry Scandinavians, and America is a more homogeneous society. Let's be honest, that is true. Scandinavian countries are very isolated, and have very little immigration, therefore... Swedes tend to marry Swedes, Finns tend to marry Finns... now and then a Swede may marry a Finn! It's just because of the region and culture of that part of the world, it's not RACIST to point that out!

Taichiliberal quote: Someone needs to clue Dixie in....Sweden has LONG been integrated.....not to the scale as America has, but it would freak Dixie out to come in contact with a browned skin or yellow skin or black skin Swedish person. The Swiss and Finnish are not far behind.

There is NO justification on any level for the BK subconscious slip. A health care system does NOT depend upon racial make up in any shape form or fashion to properly work. That the idea was in his mind points directly to the subliminal racism that permeates the American psyche. That folk like Dixie contradict themselves left and right with their pseudo-intellectual balancing act of racist rhetoric and disclaimers of racist feelings is self evident.

I don't recall ever typing "Sweden is NOT integrated!" Perhaps you can find that exact quote for me, dipshit... or better yet, stop your pathetic lying and misleading people about what the fuck I said. I'm getting real tired of this shit, every time one of you asswipes posts, it's some fucked in the head bullshit that I never said, but you TWISTED my words into, so you could carry on your little HIT campaign on me. Fuck you dishonest pricks, you don't deserve to be responded to.


I just merely pointed out that you are ignorant to the immigration situation in Sweden, Switzerland and Finland, as your statement shows. Case in point, Sweden took in Vietnamese refugees at the end of the Vietnam War.

As of 2008, 17.9% of the population had foreign origins. (source: Wikipedia)

So Sweden is about one of the LEAST homogeneous societies on the planet... of the 17.9%, the majority are FINNS! When you combine all of the indigenous Scandinavian peoples of Sweden, the remainder is something like 0.5% "other" ...which probably accounts for one black guy who works at a Swedish carnival! If you want to believe Sweden is the same "melting pot" as America, you are too ignorant to have an adult discussion. It's not anywhere CLOSE to being as diverse in makeup of population.

Once again, you display a fantastic ignorance of a subject when you isolate ONE bit of generalized information to support your supposition and conjectures. Sweden is a SMALL country, you dunce. It's no brain teaser that it's immigration ratio would be small to the rest of the world. Given that the current general population is just over 9 million people, any immigration population that's over 5% is noteworthy. About 8 years ago 11.5% of Swedens population were immigrants...and they're a very mixed group http://www.bambooweb.com/articles/D/e/Demographics_of_Sweden.html

Do some honest, proper research to get a clue as to what's going there now, mastermind. 17.9% immigrants of a population that is a little more than 9 million is pretty substantial.....and if you weren't so hyped to defend your foolish assertions you'd recognize that.

See genius, I'm aware of how moronic your assertions are because I've personally know some Swedes for years....and they laughed like hell when I showed them your post. Check out the link I give...it confirms that your statement about "one black guy at a carnival" speaks volumes of how proud you are of your willful ignorance. That's your problem Dixie, not only are you proud of your ignorance, but your insipidly stubborn about it. Makes for good entertainment, though.

If you will bother to READ the thread, instead of reacting to your knee jerking... you will find that I have NOT condoned or supported Brian Kilmeades viewpoint or argument in any way, it was a flawed and stupid point to make, and he should have just sat there and waited for some "sports" topic to come along before opening his mouth.... but he didn't! He said what he said, it wasn't "racist" it wasn't advocating "Nazism" and it was definitely not something that should have consumed liberals (and some conservatives) for days on end!

You keep parroting the same BS that was refuted and disproved several times by others previously. But hope springs eternal, so let me dumb it down for you: Kilmeades mental slip gave the viewer a clue as to his core beliefs...in high school kids would yell out "Freud!" when such things happened. IF IT WASN'T IN HIS PERSONAL REALM OF BELIEF, HE WOULDN'T HAVE SAID IT, ALLUDED TO IT, SUGGESTED IT, OR IMPLIED IT. "Ethinic purity" has NOTHING to do with how a country's health care system functions....Period. The ONLY people who associate ethnicity or race with this are white supremacist, neo-nazis, hate groups and your run of the mill bigots and racist.....people who try to tie in race/ethnicity with any and ALL social and/economic problems, whether logically applicable or not. People who DON'T think that way would NOT entertain such analogies as Kilmeades did. That is what he is being called out on....whether he should be fired, make a public apology or have a disclaimer made by Fox is just an appropo discussion to the FACT of his screw-up!

Nothing I have said in this thread has been a contradiction. You make that lame statement as a JAB at me, because you can't refute the argument on the table, and you lack the mental wattage to debate me head-to-head in a fair discussion of the issue. You and the other nitwit pinheads here, resort to this middle school mentality sniping at me, over shit I never said, and in most cases, a sane rational person would never say. It's almost like you have some fucked up thing in your brain that tells you to REFUTE DIXIE no matter if Dixie is 100% absolutely right in what he is saying.... can't let him think he got something right... so we have to REFUTE DIXIE! if that means making shit up, lying and distorting, or trying to argue me into some 'moral' corner I can't back out of... you will do whatever you have to, because what is IMPORTANT in pinhead world is to REFUTE DIXIE!


Fuck you One, Fuck you All!

See Folks, when you have a poster start referring to themselves in the 3rd person, you begin to realize that they are slightly delusional as to the accuracy and rationality of what they post. Dixie just cannot grasp that he cannot on one hand denounce Kilmeade's statement and then on the other hand excuse/rationalize it. Logically, he can't have it both ways.....but Logic is NOT in our Confederate flag waving parrot's vocabulary. To wit, he stamps his feet and wails in frustrated anger that others can easily expose his folly and reduce him to ad nauseum repetition. Like all prejudiced people, Dixie can't stand being logically shown how his self styled intellectual prejudices mimic dreck you'd find in the writings of David Duke. Yes, while Dixie might allude to the old cliche "some of my best friends are black", one has to wonder if he confusing "acquaintances" with "friendship", given his postings.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

to espouse the idea that it is wrong to marry outside your own race, for whatever reason, is racist... Res ipsa loquitur.

No it's not. Why you want to apply the Latin phrase "Res ipsa loquitur" to this, I don't know, but it means "the thing speaks for itself." Nothing speaks for itself here! You can either show me where a religious viewpoint of what people believe God intended, is based on a racist viewpoint of racial superiority/inferiority of race or ethnic purity, or you CAN'T show me that! As I said, you can be of the opinion that this Biblical view is incorrect, as I am, and you can even claim it is racist if that is your opinion, but in order to prove it is a racist viewpoint, you must establish the viewpoint pertains to racial equality, superiority, or inferiority. You simply haven't done that.

This would be the same as claiming that someone who opposes income taxes is a traitor and unpatriotic. That if you oppose school prayer, you are obviously not a Christian! That if you oppose abortion, you MUST hate women! If anything, this thread proves what a bunch of absolute BIGOTS you people are! To be so arrogant as to assume you KNOW what people's motivations and intentions are, based on how they feel about certain things. That is absurd beyond comprehension to me!

How a person views interracial marriage, has little or nothing to do with how they view people of other races, or how they fell about racial supremacy. Could it be a racist view? Of course it COULD be, but it isn't an automatic. Many people simply believe it is not part of God's plan, it has nothing whatsoever to do with racial equality, or racism. It is purely a religious belief, and it applies uniformly across all races of people. You've not contradicted that point, and you can't. This is why you have to invoke brainy Latin phrases to excuse yourself from the obligation of proving your case. Sorry... you FAIL!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Um... you do know the demographics of Sweden, eh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Sweden


They are one of the least mixed groups on this planet.

Here's an edited version of what I told Dixie on the subject:

Sweden is a SMALL country.... It's no brain teaser that it's immigration ratio would be small to the rest of the world. Given that the current general population is just over 9 million people, any immigration population that's over 5% is noteworthy. About 8 years ago 11.5% of Swedens population were immigrants...and they were a very mixed group http://www.bambooweb.com/articles/D/...of_Sweden.html

now... 17.9% immigrants of a population that is 9 million is pretty substantial.

 

[Cypress]

to espouse the idea that it is wrong to marry outside your own race, for whatever reason, is racist... Res ipsa loquitur.

Touche.

The problem is some people are racist, and they don't even realize it. Like Dixie. its an unconcious form of racism. We've all got our own subconcious bias'.

But, Dixie is the text book case of the dude who is racially insenstitive and supports racist views, but is unaware of his own prejudice.

 

[uscitizen]

Correct and some think Neocon is racist. Go figure.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

See Folks, when you have a poster start referring to themselves in the 3rd person, you begin to realize that they are slightly delusional as to the accuracy and rationality of what they post. Dixie just cannot grasp that he cannot on one hand denounce Kilmeade's statement and then on the other hand excuse/rationalize it. Logically, he can't have it both ways.....but Logic is NOT in our Confederate flag waving parrot's vocabulary. To wit, he stamps his feet and wails in frustrated anger that others can easily expose his folly and reduce him to ad nauseum repetition. Like all prejudiced people, Dixie can't stand being logically shown how his self styled intellectual prejudices mimic dreck you'd find in the writings of David Duke. Yes, while Dixie might allude to the old cliche "some of my best friends are black", one has to wonder if he confusing "acquaintances" with "friendship", given his postings.

See folks, this is an example of someone who can't bother themselves with being honest. They have to resort to lies and distortions to make a more profound statement. They have to post their stupidity in color so it stands out, because that garners more attention, and they are complete attention whores. Logic is a word they use to criticize what they can't refute. They will simply repeat themselves over and over, as if we couldn't have possibly read what they posted the first time, because we didn't respond! Dammit, they demand ATTENTION! Pay attention to this idiot, or else! Right now, he is posting in blue, but when the right-wing terror threat level goes up, he will start posting in Orange... then in RED! We really need to pay attention to him before then, because there's no telling what comes after posting in RED!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Touche.

The problem is some people are racist, and they don't even realize it. Like Dixie. its an unconcious form of racism. We've all got our own subconcious bias'.

But, Dixie is the text book case of the dude who is racially insenstitive and supports racist views, but is unaware of his own prejudice.

No, what it is, is some people are BIGOTS. They assume people MUST be racist because they have a difference of opinion with others. Instead of articulating a case for their view, they will repeat Latin phrases which don't apply, and continue to insist something is like they say it is, regardless of their inability to prove it so. This is how BIGOTRY works! You don't need to have valid arguments to back your viewpoint, you just need to stubbornly insist you are right and others are wrong!

You and Mainey are textbook cases of full-blown BIGOTS.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
See Folks, when you have a poster start referring to themselves in the 3rd person, you begin to realize that they are slightly delusional as to the accuracy and rationality of what they post. Dixie just cannot grasp that he cannot on one hand denounce Kilmeade's statement and then on the other hand excuse/rationalize it. Logically, he can't have it both ways.....but Logic is NOT in our Confederate flag waving parrot's vocabulary. To wit, he stamps his feet and wails in frustrated anger that others can easily expose his folly and reduce him to ad nauseum repetition. Like all prejudiced people, Dixie can't stand being logically shown how his self styled intellectual prejudices mimic dreck you'd find in the writings of David Duke. Yes, while Dixie might allude to the old cliche "some of my best friends are black", one has to wonder if he confusing "acquaintances" with "friendship", given his postings.

See folks, this is an example of someone who can't bother themselves with being honest. They have to resort to lies and distortions to make a more profound statement. They have to post their stupidity in color so it stands out, because that garners more attention, and they are complete attention whores. Logic is a word they use to criticize what they can't refute. They will simply repeat themselves over and over, as if we couldn't have possibly read what they posted the first time, because we didn't respond! Dammit, they demand ATTENTION! Pay attention to this idiot, or else! Right now, he is posting in blue, but when the right-wing terror threat level goes up, he will start posting in Orange... then in RED! We really need to pay attention to him before then, because there's no telling what comes after posting in RED!

And that's the best you've GOT?!! A piss poor mimicry of my writing style (shows your lack of originality), and out of context quote and then some whiny drivel about the font colors? What pathetic SOS (yes, S-O-S, not S-O-B...figure it out, genius) you are. Bottom line: you got your ass kicked in the last post, and you can't logically or factually refute it.
[ame="http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=468833&postcount=282"]Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - "We keep marrying other species and ethnics " - Fox News Host[/ame]
Say goodnight gracie....shows over for you.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

This message is hidden because Taichiliberal is on your ignore list.

 

[apple0154]

???...well, I got my first gun around that age, yes.....did you never hunt?.....

I grew up with rifles in the cupboard in the back porch. No lock. Shells on the top shelf.

Stop by a neighbor's house and you may see a rifle leaning up against the wall near the back door. Nobody thought anything of it.

 

[apple0154]

in the state where you live, can you deprive a five year old of life or liberty without due process of law....

Of course! If a five year old says, "I'm going to the store to buy a chocolate bar with money grandma gave me" the child's mother or father can certainly deprive that child of the liberty of going to the store.

 

[WinterBorn]

Of course! If a five year old says, "I'm going to the store to buy a chocolate bar with money grandma gave me" the child's mother or father can certainly deprive that child of the liberty of going to the store.

Not only can I deprive my 5 year old (if my children were still that age) of liberty, but I am responsible for doing so.

If a five year old enjoys liberties, then why are the parents held responsible for all of the child's actions?

 

[apple0154]

you folks have some strange ideas about the purpose of the Constitution.....you wouldn't by chance be liberals would you?.....

Strange ideas? Liberty and the pursuit of happiness is exactly that. Do wahtever you want as long as it doesn't harm anyone else.

Like gay marriage. How does two gays marrying interfere in anyone's life except the life of a busy-body?

Abortion. Whose ass is on the table, literally?

It's typically the Cons who, for some unknown reason, like to stick their noses in other people's pants. That's what I find strange....well, especially with people they don't know intimately.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Of course! If a five year old says, "I'm going to the store to buy a chocolate bar with money grandma gave me" the child's mother or father can certainly deprive that child of the liberty of going to the store.

again, the purpose of the Constitution is not to protect the child from his parents, it is to protect the child from the government......is this somehow unclear to you?.....

Strange ideas?

yes, strange....you keep talking about children and parental control......the Constitution has nothing to do with in loco parentis.....

 

[Socrtease]

Squirm? You must be confusing me with your Mom again!

Ooooo good burn Dicks. You should have said I know you are but what am I? Or "I'm rubber and youre glue." THose would have been great too.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Ooooo good burn Dicks. You should have said I know you are but what am I? Or "I'm rubber and youre glue." THose would have been great too.

Damn, that was back on Page 4! I forgot about it already! It was actually just the setup burn for the one which followed, now THAT was a classic! After he lays the pity-trip about his mom being 90 and near death... I told him I thought that was amazing, his mother must have had him when she was 75... and to raise a retarded kid at that age.... WOW!

Nah... Rubber and Glue? That's Mainey's style!

 

[Socrtease]

If someone has the religious belief that marrying outside of race is wrong in the eyes of God, that is their personal religious faith, not a "racist" viewpoint.

No dumbass, that is USING god and religion to validate your racist viewpoint. It was one of the reasons for opposing interracial marriages in the south. It was racist then and it is racist now and if you can't see that difference then you really are so stupid I can't see how you can walk and breathe at the same time. I bet your lips move when you read this too.

 

[Socrtease]

Ok I have read as much of this as I can. The last post I read was Dicksies post about believing that marriage outside your race based on religious belief is not racist.

As for Tinfoil's comment....FUCK YOU YOU CRACKER ASS CRACKER MOTHERFUCKER!

As for the statement that originally sparked this post, it was indeed racist. No one but racists talk about ethnicity as species, FUCKING NO ONE. WHen you jump to defend this as non racist you look stoopid. It was pure and simple racist. Equating species with ethnicity can't be described as anything else.

Oh and Tinfoil, did I say FUCK YOU YOU CRACKER ASS CRACKER MOTHERFUCKER?

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

No dumbass, that is USING god and religion to validate your racist viewpoint. It was one of the reasons for opposing interracial marriages in the south. It was racist then and it is racist now and if you can't see that difference then you really are so stupid I can't see how you can walk and breathe at the same time. I bet your lips move when you read this too.

Nah, my lips didn't move, was that supposed to indicate something?

I already said, it COULD mean someone has a racist viewpoint, and they COULD be using religion as a cover for it. BUT, someone could also enter into an actual interracial marriage as a cover for their racist views. So we see, these are two entirely separate viewpoints, and you have merely lumped them together because you are bigoted in your view. You arrogantly assume you know what people's motives and reasons are for how they feel, and that is not the case, you simply don't know or understand how everyone feels or views an issue like this. Or any issue, for that matter!

I even gave you an example of this earlier, using an issue near and dear to your heart... abortion! If someone opposes abortion, does it mean they hate women? If someone allows abortion, does it mean they are Atheist? Wouldn't that be me applying a stereotype and and bigoted view to what someone's motivations might be? This is the point I have been standing up for through 8 pages of nonsense. You can't automatically say, because someone is opposed to interracial marriage, it means they are racist. It simply doesn't mean that! It COULD mean that... or it COULD mean they believe they are following a mandate from their God, which they have the full right to do.