You [insults deleted]
Its not poltiically incorrect. Its treating them as subhuman. Nobody in their right fucking mind equates the word species with skin color. Its not even plausible as a verbal gaffe. But it no surprise you defend the Klan. I remember you citing the biblical arguments against inter racial marriage. How exactly did you become so intimately familiar with those arguments? Just innocent, benign research on your part? LOL
First of all, you are typing as if you are drunk, and I refuse to argue with drunks on a Sunday. I haven't seen the clip, I don't watch Fox & Friends very often, because I can't stand Steve Doocy OR Brian Kilmeade, they act like idiots and goofballs... Gretchen is effing hot beyond belief, so IF you catch me watching Fox & Friends, that is likely why.
I am going by what I have read here, and I don't know why BK said this, but I do understand the context of the argument at the time, and I don't believe BK was condoning, advocating, or supporting in any way, the "pure race" concepts of Nazism, or anything remotely close to that. I would have chosen a different path to refute the socialists arguments using the Scandinavian health care system, but I am not the idiot Brian Kilmeade is. I have indeed argued that people of that region are very tight-knit, and they do not have the emigrant influx we have in America, legal and non-legal. A socialist system will work to satisfactory degree in an isolated, standardized type of society. That is precisely why people like Hitler and the Nazi's wanted to implement the "pure race" ideology. To make everyone the same.
BK is guilty of being stupid, that is all I see. If the point was somehow supposed to be, that 'genetic makeup' of people who are 'purer race' than others, are somehow less likely to be sick or unhealthy, that is without scientific basis, as well. In other "species" of animal, the purer the breed, the more likely they are to suffer from something adverse to their particular breed. So Brian Kilmeade fails on both levels of the argument, and is totally guilty of being stupid.
Does he deserve to lose his job and be called a Nazi sympathizer? I don't think so! If we aren't going to demand that David Letterman lose his job...when he PLANNED his remarks, then we can't demand firing someone for being stupid.
Your a [insult deleted]. Anyone who makes a joke about women being sluts is out of bounds. Letterman was an asshole, and that joke was tasteless.
The fact that you are trying to draw moral eqivalency between a tasteless joke, and some abhorant Klan bullshit speaks volumes about your racist intent. I don't even think you know you're a racist. Your one of those cons who doesn't even recognize their own racism.
Like Tinfoil.
I'm not racist at all, but I am also not hypersensitive to false accusations of racism. I think that diminishes the actual focus on
true racism, which we should all be emphasizing and speaking out against, instead of obsessing about a 'right-winger' who said something boneheaded on live TV.
I would have never made the argument Kilmeade made, and it wasn't very smart for him to make it. But let the man apologize, like you did with David Letterman, and move on. There is no need for all of this hyperbole of ignorance regarding a racist viewpoint that does not exist in this case. It's just more overblown liberal hypocrisy on full display. You don't like BK, he is a rightie, and you want to destroy him... that's all this is about. It's what you people have become! A rolling HIT SQUAD of morons and fools!