We have a paranoid delusional President.

Dogma said:
Jarod is complaining about Trump when we just had a President that:

1. Visited 57 states. Lol

2. Interfered with police every time the criminal was black.

3. Told millions they could keep their insurance and their doctors.

4. Stated ISIS was under control many times.

The list goes on and on.
Click to expand...


You have a quote about ISIS?
 
domer76 said:
A couple. But then again, you have have as many or more that regularly cite WND, Breitbart and Infowars.

Checkmate
Click to expand...
I had some hope for you but seemingly you are little different to the other jetsam from DC Munkies. Here is just one extract, it describes very neatly the crazy attitudes of the feminist left.



9) Selective Outrage

I was a graduate student. Female genital mutilation came up in class. I stated, without ornamentation, that it is wrong.

A fellow graduate student, one who was fully funded and is now a comfortably tenured professor, sneered at me. “You are so intolerant. Clitoredectomy is just another culture’s rite of passage. You Catholics have confirmation.”

When Mitt Romney was the 2012 Republican presidential candidate, he mentioned that, as Massachusetts governor, he proactively sought out female candidates for top jobs. He had, he said, “binders full of women.” He meant, of course, that he stored resumes of promising female job candidates in three-ring binders.

Op-ed pieces, Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show,” Twitter, Facebook, and Amazon posts erupted in a feeding frenzy, savaging Romney and the Republican Party for their “war on women.”

I was an active leftist for decades. I never witnessed significant leftist outrage over clitoredectomy, child marriage, honor killing, sharia-inspired rape laws, stoning, or acid attacks. Nothing. Zip. Crickets. I’m not saying that that outrage does not exist. I’m saying I never saw it.

The left’s selective outrage convinced me that much canonical, left-wing feminism is not so much support for women, as it is a protest against Western, heterosexual men. It’s an “I hate” phenomenon, rather than an “I love” phenomenon.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
Milagro said:
I had some hope for you but seemingly you are little different to the other jetsam from DC Munkies. Here is just one extract, it describes very neatly the crazy attitudes of the feminist left.



9) Selective Outrage

I was a graduate student. Female genital mutilation came up in class. I stated, without ornamentation, that it is wrong.

A fellow graduate student, one who was fully funded and is now a comfortably tenured professor, sneered at me. “You are so intolerant. Clitoredectomy is just another culture’s rite of passage. You Catholics have confirmation.”

When Mitt Romney was the 2012 Republican presidential candidate, he mentioned that, as Massachusetts governor, he proactively sought out female candidates for top jobs. He had, he said, “binders full of women.” He meant, of course, that he stored resumes of promising female job candidates in three-ring binders.

Op-ed pieces, Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show,” Twitter, Facebook, and Amazon posts erupted in a feeding frenzy, savaging Romney and the Republican Party for their “war on women.”

I was an active leftist for decades. I never witnessed significant leftist outrage over clitoredectomy, child marriage, honor killing, sharia-inspired rape laws, stoning, or acid attacks. Nothing. Zip. Crickets. I’m not saying that that outrage does not exist. I’m saying I never saw it.

The left’s selective outrage convinced me that much canonical, left-wing feminism is not so much support for women, as it is a protest against Western, heterosexual men. It’s an “I hate” phenomenon, rather than an “I love” phenomenon.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
Click to expand...

(laughing)

More quotes from that nutcase adjunct professor in Women's Studies at a third rate university.

Your fixation is noted.
 
domer76 said:
(laughing)

More quotes from that nutcase adjunct professor in Women's Studies at a third rate university.

Your fixation is noted.
Click to expand...

Why are you such an ocean going cunt, I mean why really?? She is 100% right, we have had a whole succession of women, and men, on here spouting the same drivel.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
Milagro said:
Why are you such an ocean going cunt, I mean why really?? She is 100% right, we have had a whole succession of women, and men, on here spouting the same drivel.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
Click to expand...

(laughing)

How many threads did you post that same link on? Five? Six?

Holy shit, pal. That is some kind of fixation!

She was/is a nutcase. Outside of 3 standard deviations. An outlier. And her students continue to say so.

Find a couple of fruitcakes on this forum that are that extreme. I can certainly find more RW idiots to match. Probably more.
 
Thing1 said:
Well, to indulge your obsession - I said that the left's hysteria about Trump is warranted. So, of course, Trump merely being hysterical wouldn't be 'warranted.' I didn't say that ALL hysteria, about pretty much anything, is warranted.

Isn't it embarrassing how bad your reading comprehension is? I hope I'm not making you cry or anything, btw.
Click to expand...

Oh SNAP!!

That's going to leave a mark!
 
iolo said:
It is developing into a genuine marker for real right-wing thickoes, who'd prefer to destroy humanity than weigh evidence.
Click to expand...

Climate change deniers like Tommy would prefer to destroy humanity rather than change their lifestyle a bit.
 
anatta said:
are you in Havana?
I doubt Trump will keep saying Obama is his friend..lol

The Gitmo Tweet was correct in the "122 have returned to terrorism"
( and we got an AQAP in the last airstrike who was a Gitmo detainee -but wrongly blamed Obama for all the releases.

However since Obama did reclassify a lot of them down from "high value" - i suspect you are going to see a lot more recidivism.
CONCLUSION: they never should have been released by Obama in his zeal to close Gitmo
Click to expand...

Except the facts are:

113 were released by DUBYA before Obama ever took office.

ONLY EIGHT were released by Obama.
 
anatta said:
are you in Havana?
I doubt Trump will keep saying Obama is his friend..lol

The Gitmo Tweet was correct in the "122 have returned to terrorism"
( and we got an AQAP in the last airstrike who was a Gitmo detainee -but wrongly blamed Obama for all the releases.

However since Obama did reclassify a lot of them down from "high value" - i suspect you are going to see a lot more recidivism.
CONCLUSION: they never should have been released by Obama in his zeal to close Gitmo
Click to expand...

And Trump began the BACKPEDALING today:

Sean Spicer: When Trump Blamed ‘Obama’ Earlier ‘Obviously’ He Didn’t Mean ‘Obama’

Lyin’ Donald Trump tweeted this morning that former President Barack Obama was responsible for 122 “vicious prisoners” being released from Guantanamo Bay and returning to the battlefield. However, that never happened. Trump is blaming an unemployed black guy for his predecessor’s actions. Trump’s tweet read, “122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield. Just another terrible decision!” That’s some real Alt-fact thinking right there. So White House press secretary Sean Spicer had to clean up after his boss’s mess but he did a terrible job.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence states that 113 of the 122 former detainees who have taken up arms again were released before Obama’s first term, meaning during the Bush administration’s time in office.

“Obviously the president meant in totality, the number that had been released on the battlefield — that have been released from Gitmo since individuals have been released,” Spicer told reporters on Tuesday. “That is correct.” We know that hurts your brain, too.

Sure, OBVIOUSLY, when Trump said “Obama” he really meant something else.

The White House is backpedaling on Trump’s accusation that Obama tapped the amateur president before the election. CNN’s Jim Acosta asked Spicer, “Where is the proof?” Spicer said that “it’s not a question of new proof or less proof or whatever,” but it’s about bringing in Congress to get to the bottom of this.

http://addictinginfo.org/2017/03/07...-earlier-obviously-he-didnt-mean-obama-video/
 
This is a national embarrassment. He needs his twitter account taken away or have major oversight. He clearly said Obama and his spokesman is now claiming he didn't mean it?

:palm:
 
Dogma said:
Just goes to show what cry babies liberals are when they lose.
Click to expand...


Awwwww...it's another butthurt Rightie who won't acknowledge Trump's mountain of lies.

It's just the cutest when they pretend to be all about "honesty and morality" until it's time to call out a fellow Republican for his LIES.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top