Way to go Obama!

I have the answer; it's because Superfreak is a totally partisan Republican.

It's just not very interesting, as in hey, that's interesting! But it's not a big secret. Well, except to him!

I like to think he's not, sometimes. I'm not sure why I like to think that. But you're right - he is.
 
I like to think he's not, sometimes. I'm not sure why I like to think that. But you're right - he is.

You probably think that because he tries to be sexy sometimes? But you have to put that out of your mind and look at the facts Onceler, like I do. The facts say that Superfreak is a Republican h...well, I don't want to use the word "hack"...that's why I used the phrase "partisan Republican".
 
When you are so definitively caught in as blatant a double-standard as I have witnessed, it is rarely enough to just keep parrotting "straw man."

It is not that. It is just you being hypocritical.

Sorry, I was unaware that Yurt had hacked into your system. When you get done with your straw men and read what I actually wrote, then you can come back and apologize.
 
I like to think he's not, sometimes. I'm not sure why I like to think that. But you're right - he is.

LMAO... so, calling Bush a horrid President with horrid fiscal policies, calling out the Reps in Congress for the repeal of Glass Steagall and the subsequent inaction while Bush was in office... that is partisan to you? Fucking idiots. You who continually apologize for Obama and ignore the Dems involvement. I point out the Dems involvement and YOU try to spin that into a new little straw man to beat upon.
 
Sorry, I was unaware that Yurt had hacked into your system. When you get done with your straw men and read what I actually wrote, then you can come back and apologize.

So, you see a difference between one thread where a Republican President presided over a crash after 8 full years in office, and you doing cartwheels to absolve him of responsibility, and pawn it off on Congressional Dems & politicians from the '90's.

And another thread, which you started, and said "Way to go, Obama!," for economic #'s just over halfway into his 1st term.

Got it.
 
You probably think that because he tries to be sexy sometimes? But you have to put that out of your mind and look at the facts Onceler, like I do. The facts say that Superfreak is a Republican h...well, I don't want to use the word "hack"...that's why I used the phrase "partisan Republican".

Not surprised that yet another liberal is confused. It is so common place with your lot. As I have stated 1000 times, I am most certainly fiscally conservative. I am moderate on most social policies. The exception you are aware of so I won't get into it here.

That said, I am not a Republican. If forced to chose, I would be Libertarian. But to a liberal they are all the same. Once something bad is said about Dems, you automatically start running around proclaiming others to be Republicans etc...

Sorry to have forced so many of your confused liberal brethren to actually accept the reality of the events that transpired leading the financial market to implode. They don't like the fact their precious masters played just as large a role in the collapse as the Republicans. To you all, pointing out that BOTH parties were responsible and that BOTH parties did nothing to stop it... that equates to 'partisan Republican'???? Seriously retarded. I expect Dung to go full retard like that, but not you and Oncelor.
 
Not surprised that yet another liberal is confused. It is so common place with your lot. As I have stated 1000 times, I am most certainly fiscally conservative. I am moderate on most social policies. The exception you are aware of so I won't get into it here.

That said, I am not a Republican. If forced to chose, I would be Libertarian. But to a liberal they are all the same. Once something bad is said about Dems, you automatically start running around proclaiming others to be Republicans etc...

Sorry to have forced so many of your confused liberal brethren to actually accept the reality of the events that transpired leading the financial market to implode. They don't like the fact their precious masters played just as large a role in the collapse as the Republicans. To you all, pointing out that BOTH parties were responsible and that BOTH parties did nothing to stop it... that equates to 'partisan Republican'???? Seriously retarded. I expect Dung to go full retard like that, but not you and Oncelor.

LOL You're so awesome SF. I love these posts. Thanks!
 
So, you see a difference between one thread where a Republican President presided over a crash after 8 full years in office, and you doing cartwheels to absolve him of responsibility, and pawn it off on Congressional Dems & politicians from the '90's.

Thanks for yet another straw man. The above is where you are becoming quite pathetic. I did not absolve Bush you fucking idiot. I tried to point out to you that it was not just Bush in office. That while his inaction is certainly a part of the problem, it wasn't his policies or his spending that led to the financial markets imploding. Which is why your brain dead compatriots and yourself continue creating one straw man after another when I ask you WHICH of Bush's policies 'led us to the collapse of the financial sector' or even 'contributed to the financial sector collapsing'.

And another thread, which you started, and said "Way to go, Obama!," for economic #'s just over halfway into his 1st term.

Got it.

Now take a look at this thread. It was started in jest to all of the 'its all Bush's fault'. Then it went into actual POLICIES of Obama's, ACTIONS by the Obama admin, that have prolonged the downturn.

AGAIN... do let me know when you are out of straw. Then perhaps you can put on your big boy pants and discuss what I have actually written.
 
As I have stated, SF - it is literally impossible to say that a chief executive was fiscally irresponsible for 8 years, overspent, and was in general a very poor steward of the economy, and then state in the same breath that he has little or nothing to do with the banking crisis or the financial collapse.
 
Anyone who fucks Reagan's dead carcass as much as SF is either a hardcore Republican or a very twisted necrophiliac. I guess SF just has a sick fetish.
 
I find it very interesting that you went back through threads to create a straw man. Try comprehending what you read.

How many times do I have to state it before you stop creating straw men and actually address what I actually have written?

11 Zillion and counting.
 
As I have stated, SF - it is literally impossible to say that a chief executive was fiscally irresponsible for 8 years, overspent, and was in general a very poor steward of the economy, and then state in the same breath that he has little or nothing to do with the banking crisis or the financial collapse.

It isn't impossible to say anything. However, SF has never said that Bush had "nothing to do with" the debt crisis that caused the housing bubble and the recession.
 
As I have stated, SF - it is literally impossible to say that a chief executive was fiscally irresponsible for 8 years, overspent, and was in general a very poor steward of the economy, and then state in the same breath that he has little or nothing to do with the banking crisis or the financial collapse.

Again moron... for the final fucking time... Take a look around right now. Obama has been WORSE on the fiscal level. He has spent FAR more in deficits than Bush ever did. Yet the banking sector hasn't collapsed again has it?

Fucking idiot.
 
It isn't impossible to say anything. However, SF has never said that Bush had "nothing to do with" the debt crisis that caused the housing bubble and the recession.

Methinks you ought to read the other thread on this before jumping in....
 
Back
Top