Neither new readers nor old readers are reading this. Only you and I. Our exchange is uninteresting.1. the link is for the new reader's clarification of what transpires here.
Most people in grade school understand this is not a question:Most people are taught in grade school that you don't answer a question with a question.
In fact there is no question from me that is a question to your question. You haven't asked any that I can find.Which does nothing to directly answer any of my queries.
So now we're back to her being depressed, used and manipulated - my original contention.2. Moosie STILL tries to substitute supposition and conjecture for fact. My previous links provides valid, documented fact that Moosie's previous declaration that Thunberg left school to become a professional, paid activist who made (and got paid) for "acting" in documentaries made about her WAS FLAT OUT WRONG.
This statement: " You have not even attempted to directly answer one of my questions" does not correlate to "I know you are but what am I?"3.Moosie's best retort, "I know you are but what am I?" Pathetic.
Does not answer the question: "Please tell me ... what are the facts concerning Greta? Is she a depressed , abused child? Is She an actress? Is she spouting lies and if so for what reason? " In fact you make no attempt to answer any of my questions. They're too uncomfortable for you to answer honestly.4. See #1, and #2.
Nobody is reading this.5. As the reader can see,
I'd argue most are. Maybe even Greta. But not on GW. Watch the vid.is of the mindset that high school juniors are incapable of being articulate.
If one is passionate about a topic they don't freeze when queried.Worse, if they make a mistake or falter they are automatically guilty of all the false accusation Moosie and other right wing stooges have made.
E.g., ask me anything about a full golf swing or a freestyle swim stroke. I could talk nonstop for at least an hour and give thoughtful intelligent answers about each. If I couldn't I'd state why, not defer to some mute sitting next to me.
Possibly but you don't really know. We do know that Greta's incapable of open discussion on a topic she's supposedly passionate about. Watch the vid.Obviously, Moosie's educational facilities didn't have room for debate teams, or his teacher's never had open discussions on any subject that required articulation that was guided and honed by the teachers. Sad.
They apparently parrot me. I don't watch that crap. But I am flattered.6. Moosie just keeps parroting the SOS found in the punditry of Fox News, Sinclair broadcasting stations and Murdock publications/broadcasting,
What is inconsistent with me being a classical liberal? It is you(pl.) that have bastardized classical liberalism and given liberalism a bad name.as he demonstrates his inability to deal with the full definition of being a liberal in American social politics outside of his myopic choice.
It is modern liberals that have morphed into neocons with nation building, war mongering, "smart power", etc. The tea party is defunct. Jim DeMint is no longer in congress and Ted Cruz is a has been. What's an "oather"? It's not even in Urban Dictionary.7. And with his last diatribe, Moosie further digs his neocon/tea bag party/oather grave.
This sounds very much like you're the one that's done.He's done and I'm not going to waste more space on his insipid stubbornness.

Last edited:
So much more to pity them.