Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

[Monad Portal]

NO IT WOULDN'T.

You have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

You're just making it all up as you go, and you know it.

Have you ever set foot in a courtroom in your life? Or is all your analysis based off Law and Order reruns?

It clearly would be objected to successfully for being hearsay, as it definitely is hearsay.

 

[LV426]

It clearly would be objected to successfully for being hearsay, as it definitely is hearsay.

And the judge would have overruled the objection because it's not hearsay if a witness is testifying to something someone else told them.

You have NO IDEA what you're talking about.

 

[Monad Portal]

And the judge would have overruled the objection because it's not hearsay if a witness is testifying to something someone else told them.

thats the definition of hearsay.

are you fucking dumb or somethin?

 

[LV426]

thats the definition of hearsay.

NO IT ISN'T.

What that person may have been told is hearsay, but them testifying that someone told it to them MOST DEFINITELY IS NOT.