Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

evince said:
Congress is allowed to investigate things you pile of oozy shit
Even if no republicans were on the committee
But two republicans are on the committee you pustule
Click to expand...

This isn't an investigation however. It's a show inquisition made for TV audiences suffering with severely retarded IQs. ;)
 
LV426 said:
You're lying because at the start, you said you would never watch it.
Click to expand...

Wrong, you're the sociopathic lying dumbass making shit up. Link me to where I said I would never watch it. I will understand if you can't find it. It doesn't exist. Your making bullshit up like you always do. But alas, you suffer from a severely retarded IQ and have zero self awareness. Now do yourself a favor and run along. :palm:
 
LV426 said:
You put your tiny foot in your big mouth all the fucking time and then you shriek like this whenever anyone calls it out.

Because you're a big fucking baby.
Click to expand...
in·fan·tile
(ĭn′fən-tīl′, -tĭl)
adj.
Displaying or suggesting a lack of maturity; childish: infantile behavior; an infantile remark.

giphy.gif
 
LV426 said:
What happened with that?

Oh right, the Secret Service guy never said he would refute Hutchinson, a Nazi on Twitter said that a source close to the Secret Service said that and Conservatives have been exaggerating that the same way Flash does.
Click to expand...

The blow back against her testimony died away as the important parts were confirmed by other sources, the most important being Trump knew members of the mob were armed yet called on them to march on the Capitol anyway, where merely carrying a weapon on the grounds is a crime and Trump expected more than that. Also important was her testimony, also confirmed, that Trump intended to be with them and did not only because the Secret Service agents refused to take him. Whether his demonstrated anger over their refusal, also confirmed, included a grab for the steering wheel is irrelevant but because it is the one thing in her testimony reportedly refuted
Trumpers latched onto it like a life preserver in a tsunami. Not only has her testimony not been rebutted it is inducing other White House witnesses, heretofore silent, to come forward.
 
Last edited:
Truth Detector said:
This isn't an investigation however. It's a show inquisition made for TV audiences suffering with severely retarded IQs. ;)
Click to expand...

How do you account for all the facts being shown you shitty Russian dick polisher?


Guess who watches America TV ass drip?



Americans along with the entire world


Trump is double fucked
 
Damocles said:
It is, however, 100% of the topic of this thread. I understand you are trying to deflect away from points where her credibility was lost by trying to pretend that they were unimportant and should therefore be ignored, correct?
Click to expand...

The bolded is such fantastical hyperbole. Why do you feel such a strong need to defend Trump?

Her credibility is not in question, at all. Only by the cultists. I'm surprised that you're continuing along this "hearsay" line of reasoning when it was a small fraction of her testimony.
 
Damocles said:
It is still hearsay if you are repeating what another said. In the example I gave you the report they (Amber's attorneys) had entered into evidence earlier Amber was a participant in the appointment that resulted in the report, but every time they tried to get her to talk about what was on the report it was Hearsay... because it was repeating what someone else said on something instead of testifying.

Let's say there is ketchup on the wall and someone tells her that it was because of tRump. Seeing ketchup is not hearsay, repeating the story even though you participated in the conversation is hearsay.

The way around this for her attorneys would be to have Amber read the report and then ask questions about what she read, but they kept trying to get her to talk about it rather than reference it.
Click to expand...

There is NOTHING about hearsay being involved w/ a testimony that undermines everything else in that testimony - it's understood that portion IS hearsay, but the rest is firsthand.

This is so embarrassing. She has NOT lost any credibility, whatsoever.
 
evince said:
How do you account for all the facts being shown you shitty Russian dick polisher?
Guess who watches America TV ass drip?
Americans along with the entire world
Trump is double fucked
Click to expand...

There have been no facts you sad, pathetic, repugnant and worthless piece of human excrement. Now take your meds and get back to that padded cell. ;)
 
Conservatives decided that she wasn't credible as soon as she started speaking. That's the world we live in now.

A lifetime pathological liar is constantly excused, but a brave woman who has had zero history of lying is immediately questioned and marginalized. It's pathetic.
 
BartenderElite said:
Conservatives decided that she wasn't credible as soon as she started speaking. That's the world we live in now.

A lifetime pathological liar is constantly excused, but a brave woman who has had zero history of lying is immediately questioned and marginalized. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...

The pathological liar is your guy Biden dipshit. :palm:
 
Damocles said:
The easiest solution to this issue would be to call the Secret Service Agent instead of someone that overheard a conversation. Or the valet instead of having someone repeat what amounts to juicy gossip about how Trump uses ketchup on steak (should be a crime, though it is not) and may have been upset, also not a crime.
Click to expand...

The video of Jan 6 is enough to put Trump in Levansworth
 
LV426 said:
You know why? Because he stopped being President on 1/20/21.

She was trying to get a job with him for after by hitting up Pam Bondi for advice.

Are you gonna say she's a coffee girl next?
Click to expand...

No. Do you know what her job was?
 
LV426 said:
Because you loudmouths would never shut the fuck up about it if they did.
Click to expand...

Quite the contrary. Two reasons: 1) I don’t think anyone cares, and 2) I told you, you will never hear from them if they do come forward, unless they support hutchinson’s version of events.

What the fuck are you talking about?
Click to expand...

Get a grownup to read it to you again.

Do you not know how depositions work, you fucking idiot?
Click to expand...

Of course I do, especially in this case. Your super sleuths get this woman to testify in person to a bunch of unmitigated bullshit (that she heard 2nd hand, no less). And everyone applauds her bravery. The secret service agents are “invited” to come forward with their version of events. They will be deposed. If their version jives with hutchinson’s, you’ll hear the RECORDED deposition in open committee. If they don’t accept the invitation, RINO Liz sternly crosses her arms, looks over her glasses like my HS Latin teacher, and says “well Mr. Secret Service, we’re still waiting.” (Like you said, it’s been 3 weeks! Why hasn’t she said anything?). The 3rd scenario is, they are deposed and they say huchinson is a lying sack of shit. Do you think der committee wants that out in the open?

Something else for you to wrestle with: from the beginning, you’ve tried to make it a point that Trump was doing nothing to stop the protest. But now hutchinson has him in the car, demanding to go to the capitol to stop the thing. Kind of fucks up your narrative, huh?

You really are a fucking moron, aren't you? So goddamn stupid I can't believe you haven't drowned in a bowl of soup yet.
Click to expand...

And I can’t believe your attendant has to tase you every 10 seconds to remind you to breathe.

You mean to tell me that you've been running your big, fat, fucking mouth about the 1/6 committee all year, and you haven't watched a single second of testimony?
Click to expand...

I watch the stupidest clips everyday on FOX. Nothing that would make me not vote for Trump again, and nothing illegal happened. Just a bunch of idiots afraid of losing power for the next 2 or 3 decades because a republican was successful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top