Washington Post should be shutdown for treason

Not a single liberal or democrat who has posted in this thread has addressed the OP.

Just like the DNC hack, head in sand.

Why is it okay for the WAPO to publish this, while whining about what Trump supposedly said?
 
Yaya said:
Not a single liberal or democrat who has posted in this thread has addressed the OP.

Just like the DNC hack, head in sand.

Why is it okay for the WAPO to publish this, while whining about what Trump supposedly said?
Click to expand...

I'll hop in, just this once, to school you: WaPo was very careful to only report that Trump divulged the information. They did NOT divulge the exact information - which is the crux of this controversy. What Trump divulged had nothing to do w/ what Russia might do w/ the information. What it did was potentially expose the source of the intel (something WaPo did NOT do), which is something a President should not do.

So, thread fail. Oh - and Darth, please note again that this has nothing to do with what Russia would do w/ the intel.

Okay, that's that.
 
Yaya said:
Not a single liberal or democrat who has posted in this thread has addressed the OP.

Just like the DNC hack, head in sand.

Why is it okay for the WAPO to publish this, while whining about what Trump supposedly said?
Click to expand...

Maybe you're not worth the trouble?

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
that was what? 45 years ago? I was around and following politics back then
( if you were alive - you followed politics)

but that was when INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM meant more then partisan hackery backed up by
"advocacy journalism" ( whatever the hell that is -it's what they call themselves now)
Click to expand...

Sure, why not shut down every news outlet that Trump, the Godfather of fake news doesn't like.

Investigative journalism has always been called 'hackery' by the people being investigated .. including 45 years ago.

Any and every investigation of Trump will be called 'hackery' by his supporters no matter what the evidence .. and that includes you. No disrespect intended.

From my perspective, the opposition should spread the truth about Trump AS WE SEE It using every information vehicle within our reach. Trump supporters are free to do the same.

... but it looks like we're winning. :0)

Trump Didn’t Need A Watergate To Sink His Ratings To Nixonian Levels
The president can only dream of an approval rating as high as Nixon’s in the early months of Watergate.

5919c4dd1600002000c5b40d.png


According to Gallup, Trump's approval rating stands at 38%.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-nixon-approval-ratings_us_5919bae5e4b0031e737f385e

.. and guaranteed to go down even further.

Winning
 
Cadillac Man said:
Maybe you're not worth the trouble?
Click to expand...

Another liberal troll non answer.

Yawn.

Go back to USMB and bitch about some poster named Yurt, you obsessive freak. Seriously, who joins this board and then because some other poster claims I'm Yurt, you run over to the the board that Guiddo claimed I'm from and join it just to stick it to that poster?

Seriously, who does that and then brags about it?
 
blackascoal said:
Sure, why not shut down every news outlet that Trump, the Godfather of fake news doesn't like.
Click to expand...
ridiculous assertion

Investigative journalism has always been called 'hackery' by the people being investigated .. including 45 years ago.
Click to expand...
is advocacy journalism the same as investigative journalism?
Because that's what the NYTimes called for during the election.

Is WaPo any different? No. They write towards a narrative

When you advocate, you are no longer investigating -
you are digging for slime,and your digging is biased =so called "fake news"

Any and every investigation of Trump will be called 'hackery' by his supporters no matter what the evidence .. and that includes you. No disrespect intended.
Click to expand...
none taken. standard fare between you and me.

And with Trumps shitty use of language, i might even agree this stuff about telling Comey (memo)
Flynn was a "good guy".

the problem is even an innocuous remark like that is immediately jumped on by the narrative makers
( prior known as 'newspapers') -and heavily spun so only ONE POSSIBLE MEANING IS AMPED OUT.

The Chucky Schumer goes on TeeVee and cries about it.

From my perspective, the opposition should spread the truth about Trump AS WE SEE It using every information vehicle within our reach. Trump supporters are free to do the same.
Click to expand...
ie. Advocacy Journalism if it's reported uncritically as is the norm.

"Free Press" today no longer means it has any responciblity toward the truth -only the preconceived narrative

Winning
Click to expand...
at what cost to governing?This is beyond legislative obstructionism.
It's a coupe attempt by Democrats coupled with the abuse of the free press ( who are 100% partisan hackers)
to throw out a democratically elected POTUS
Click to expand...
 
Yaya said:
Not a single liberal or democrat who has posted in this thread has addressed the OP.

Just like the DNC hack, head in sand.

Why is it okay for the WAPO to publish this, while whining about what Trump supposedly said?
Click to expand...

That would be the first amendment.
Thread fail.
 
anatta said:
blackascoal said:
ridiculous assertion

is advocacy journalism the same as investigative journalism?
Because that's what the NYTimes called for during the election.

Is WaPo any different? No. They write towards a narrative


When you advocate, you are no longer investigating -
you are digging for slime,and your digging is biased =so called "fake news"

none taken. standard fare between you and me.
And with Trumps shitty use of language, i might even agree this stuff about telling Comey (memo) Flynn was a "good guy".
the problem is even an innocuous remark like that is immediately jumped on by the narrative makers
( prior known as 'newspapers' -and heavily spun so only ONE POSSIBLE MEANING IS AMPED OUT.
The Chucky Schumer goes on TeeVee and cries about it.

ie. Advocacy Journalism if it's reported uncritically as is the norm.


at what cost to governing?This is beyond legislative obstructionism.
It's a coupe attempt by Democrats coupled with the abuse of the free press ( who are 100% partisan hackers)
to throw out a democratically elected POTUS
Click to expand...

It isn't a coupe attempt you retard.
When the Donald inevitably crosses the line he will democratically impeached.
Until then we will resist his attempts to bypass the will of the people (the true rulers)
Click to expand...
 
Rune said:
anatta said:
It isn't a coupe attempt you retard.
When the Donald inevitably crosses the line he will democratically impeached.
Until then we will resist his attempts to bypass the will of the people (the true rulers)
Click to expand...
STFU idiot.
you are incapable of understanding how government should run w/ a free press.

when a free press concocts coverage according to a pre-set narrative they are no longer informational.
they become a partisan arm. or in the worse case they become an enemy with a purpose -to bring down
a democratically elected official- for whatever perceived preset notion the operate upon..

It's no secret Trump and Wapo and NYTimes ( even more so)are essentially at war.
Click to expand...
 
Rune said:
anatta said:
It isn't a coupe attempt you retard.
When the Donald inevitably crosses the line he will democratically impeached.
Until then we will resist his attempts to bypass the will of the people (the true rulers)
Click to expand...
STFU idiot.
you are incapable of understanding how government should run w/ a free press.

when a free press concocts coverage according to a pre-set narrative they are no longer informational.
they become a partisan arm. or in the worse case they become an enemy with a purpose -to bring down
a democratically elected official- for whatever perceived preset notion the operate upon..

It's no secret Trump and Wapo and NYTimes ( even more so)are essentially at war.
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
blackascoal said:
ridiculous assertion

is advocacy journalism the same as investigative journalism?
Because that's what the NYTimes called for during the election.

Is WaPo any different? No. They write towards a narrative


When you advocate, you are no longer investigating -
you are digging for slime,and your digging is biased =so called "fake news"

none taken. standard fare between you and me.
And with Trumps shitty use of language, i might even agree this stuff about telling Comey (memo) Flynn was a "good guy".
the problem is even an innocuous remark like that is immediately jumped on by the narrative makers
( prior known as 'newspapers' -and heavily spun so only ONE POSSIBLE MEANING IS AMPED OUT.
The Chucky Schumer goes on TeeVee and cries about it.

ie. Advocacy Journalism if it's reported uncritically as is the norm.


at what cost to governing?This is beyond legislative obstructionism.
It's a coupe attempt by Democrats coupled with the abuse of the free press ( who are 100% partisan hackers)
to throw out a democratically elected POTUS
Click to expand...

It isn't a coupe attempt you retard.
When the Donald inevitably crosses the line he will democratically impeached.
Until then we will resist his attempts to bypass the will of the people (the true rulers)
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
Rune said:
STFU idiot.
you are incapable of understanding how government should run w/ a free press.

when a free press concocts coverage according to a pre-set narrative they are no longer informational.
they become a partisan arm. or in the worse case they become an enemy with a purpose -to bring down
a democratically elected official- for whatever perceived preset notion the operate upon..

It's no secret Trump and Wapo and NYTimes ( even more so)are essentially at war.
Click to expand...

Shitstain ; the press has NEVER been unbiased.
What a fucking retard you are.
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
blackascoal said:
ridiculous assertion

is advocacy journalism the same as investigative journalism?
Because that's what the NYTimes called for during the election.

Is WaPo any different? No. They write towards a narrative

When you advocate, you are no longer investigating -
you are digging for slime,and your digging is biased =so called "fake news"

none taken. standard fare between you and me.

And with Trumps shitty use of language, i might even agree this stuff about telling Comey (memo)
Flynn was a "good guy".

the problem is even an innocuous remark like that is immediately jumped on by the narrative makers
( prior known as 'newspapers') -and heavily spun so only ONE POSSIBLE MEANING IS AMPED OUT.

The Chucky Schumer goes on TeeVee and cries about it.

ie. Advocacy Journalism if it's reported uncritically as is the norm.

"Free Press" today no longer means it has any responciblity toward the truth -only the preconceived narrative


at what cost to governing?This is beyond legislative obstructionism.
It's a coupe attempt by Democrats coupled with the abuse of the free press ( who are 100% partisan hackers)
to throw out a democratically elected POTUS
Click to expand...

As I've said .. ALL investigative journalism is called some bad name by the people being investigated and their supporters. Nothing new here.

Regardless of what you call it .. there is nothing you can do to stop it .. AND, if you can't see the writing on the wall at this stage of the game, you probably haven't been paying much attention to history.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will last 4 years in office.

Surely you can see that by now.
Click to expand...
 
Thing1 said:
I'll hop in, just this once, to school you: WaPo was very careful to only report that Trump divulged the information. They did NOT divulge the exact information - which is the crux of this controversy. What Trump divulged had nothing to do w/ what Russia might do w/ the information. What it did was potentially expose the source of the intel (something WaPo did NOT do), which is something a President should not do.

So, thread fail. Oh - and Darth, please note again that this has nothing to do with what Russia would do w/ the intel.

Okay, that's that.
Click to expand...

Poor yurt
 
blackascoal said:
anatta said:
As I've said .. ALL investigative journalism is called some bad name by the people being investigated and their supporters. Nothing new here.

Regardless of what you call it .. there is nothing you can do to stop it .. AND, if you can't see the writing on the wall at this stage of the game, you probably haven't been paying much attention to history.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will last 4 years in office.

Surely you can see that by now.
Click to expand...

No, he can't see it.
He is waiting for all the bad people to leave Trump alone so that he can govern.
He is the embodiment of the three monkeys ; hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil .
He is in massive denial.
Like I said yesterday Trump could take a shit on the Constitution itself and anatta could justify it.
Click to expand...
 
GazzaQueen said:
Tell us why you're so upset, again. It's because the POTUS beat Waffle Iron, isn't it.
Click to expand...

Who said I'm upset? I've predicted he'd fail ever since June 16, 2015. trump has not only met my expectations of failure, he's exceeded them.

They should call me Cassandra for making so many accurate prophecies that nobody believed.
 
Thing1 said:
I'll hop in, just this once, to school you: WaPo was very careful to only report that Trump divulged the information. They did NOT divulge the exact information - which is the crux of this controversy. What Trump divulged had nothing to do w/ what Russia might do w/ the information. What it did was potentially expose the source of the intel (something WaPo did NOT do), which is something a President should not do.

So, thread fail. Oh - and Darth, please note again that this has nothing to do with what Russia would do w/ the intel.

Okay, that's that.
Click to expand...

So, you're not sure if the intelligence has any value to the Russians?

Are we clear on that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top