Was it Cowardice by Police in the Texas school shooting?

I don't want to Hawk. But I'm going to put you on ignore if you don't, right now, show some sympathy for those kids and teachers. This is your moment Hawk. Show me and everyone here you actually have a soul.

If you do anything else next but talk about how sorry you are for what happened on Tuesday, you and I will never talk again. And you know what?

It'll be your loss.

As you say often: Be better.

So then you are not going to face the fact that you lied.

Figures.
 
A man named Rodriguez gave the order.

Goodbye forever, Hawk. I feel bad for you, man! You actually exist, full-time, at rock bottom.

I care about you, just because I've known you for so long, but I realize now you're beyond help.

You are a broken soul.
 
Goodbye forever, Hawk. I feel bad for you, man! You actually exist, full-time, at rock bottom.

I care about you, just because I've known you for so long, but I realize now you're beyond help.

You are a broken soul.

There is no point in talking with known liars.

When you insist upon being a Dick it is even worse.
 
The bottom line: "It's the Assault rifles, stupid.

Wrong, with a capital WRONG! It was another dysfunctional human being who told people he was having serious issues, and then carried out his revenge. It wasn't the rifle that did anything. Banning "assault" rifles will do nothing--NOTHING--to fix this problem. What we need is to institute a set of laws / regulations on guns (no, not per se "gun control) that allow for increased scrutiny of persons like this 18-year-old, without simply taking his gun rights. This requires "shades of grey" rather than the current, draconian, once you get on the list you are royally fucked, but getting on the list requires massive amounts of bureaucracy and legal wrangling.
 
Last edited:
The bottom line: "It's the Assault rifles, stupid.

hey dumbfuck.........

Seung-Hui Cho, an undergraduate student at the university and a U.S. resident who was from South Korea, killed 32 people and wounded 17 others with two semi-automatic pistols.

fricking leftist anti gun jackasses
 
Wrong, with a capital WRONG! It was another dysfunctional human being who told people he was having serious issues, and then carried out his revenge. It wasn't the rifle that did anything. Banning "assault" rifles will do nothing--NOTHING--to fix this problem. What we need is to institute a set of laws / regulations on guns (no, not per se "gun control) that allow for increased scrutiny of persons like this 18-year-old, without simply taking his gun rights.

My friend. There is mental illness in all countries throughout the world. There are bad people with guns all over the world. You know what other civilized countries like Aus, NZ, and the UK don't have? Assault rifles in the hands of civilians.

We have the most gun deaths. Grab a clue, won't you?
 
Police are trained to engage the shooter in cases like this even if you are by yourself, you don't wait for backup?!! The little children were asking for help, by texting and calling 911, and you had wounded that might have lived too if it were not for the delayed response by police?!! I personally think there were scared to engage the shooter?!!

I agree. If it turns out that these reports are true, they are all cowards. I don't know how they can live with themselves.
 
hey dumbfuck.........

Seung-Hui Cho, an undergraduate student at the university and a U.S. resident who was from South Korea, killed 32 people and wounded 17 others with two semi-automatic pistols.

fricking leftist anti gun jackasses

Hi. Blow me, troll. That is all.
 
Yep. Owl Woman just doesn't want to believe the cops could be so evil. I can't blame her. Unfortunately, the cops in Uvalde are that evil.

No, I don't believe that they are evil. I do however suspect great cowardice. We'll see when all the facts are sorted out, if they ever are.
 
My friend. There is mental illness in all countries throughout the world. There are bad people with guns all over the world. You know what other civilized countries like Aus, NZ, and the UK don't have? Assault rifles in the hands of civilians.

We have the most gun deaths. Grab a clue, won't you?

Taking away the guns doesn't solve the problem. The crazies will simply find another way while you totally fuck over the not-so-crazy people who aren't the problem. What you propose amounts to a binary, draconian, solution that is easily implemented by government while ass raping law abiding citizens of their rights and freedoms.
 
Taking away the guns doesn't solve the problem. The crazies will simply find another way while you totally fuck over the not-so-crazy people who aren't the problem. What you propose amounts to a binary, draconian, solution that is easily implemented by government while ass raping law abiding citizens of their rights and freedoms.

The people who are dead set on hurting us will still hurt us.....the only solution is figuring out how we create people who so badly want to cause society pain.

Obviously we dont hear hardly anyone talking about that.
 
Taking away the guns doesn't solve the problem. The crazies will simply find another way while you totally fuck over the not-so-crazy people who aren't the problem. What you propose amounts to a binary, draconian, solution that is easily implemented by government while ass raping law abiding citizens of their rights and freedoms.

Yeah. Whatever.
 
Obviously, I'm new here. One thing I've noticed. Very few people who ID as "conservative" have any soul. This latest massacre has been a great litmus test. Those who show no sympathy for the kids and just gleefully taunt and troll are going on my ignore list. This latest shooting, although really tragic has really shown people here for what they are.

Those without empathy go on ignore.
 
The people who are dead set on hurting us will still hurt us.....the only solution is figuring out how we create people who so badly want to cause society pain.

Exactly. And in the interim, we can put such people on notice with the authorities such that they get the increased scrutiny they need when they need it.

For example, if we had a "shades of grey" Red Flag law, it might go like this:

Angry Nutter posts crazy stuff on social media about killing people and such.
People see this and report it.
The authorities make digital copies of Angry Nutter's posts and flag Angry Nutter as a potential threat.
Angry Nutter goes to a gun store to buy a weapon.
The store runs a check on Angry Nutter.
It comes back that Angry Nutter has been flagged as a possible risk.
The store's salesperson tells Angry Nutter, "Sorry, I can't sell you a gun today." He hands Angry Nutter a page with contact information. "I don't know what the problem is, but you need to contact one of these agencies and find out. Once you straighten things out with them, I'll be happy to sell you a gun. Would you like to make a down payment to hold it until things are cleared up?"

This is the current "Red Flag" situation where if you get on the 'list' you are screwed and getting off is a nightmare. Rather here, you have to go down to the local police station or the like and be interviewed for a few minutes about your crazy posts and such. If the interviewer decides you aren't the crazy threat the authorities thought you were, you're free to buy a gun. The system is tilted towards letting you buy rather than against you by design. The authorities want you to not be a nutjob. They want you to say you're just a troll, and prove it to a good degree. No draconian requirements involved.

Once you prove this, you get your gun and off you go happy with life once again.

Is it perfect? No. No system is going to be. The idea here is that say your angry ex- puts you on the list. You get denied. You go to the authorities and seeing the evidence (which they HAVE to show you), say "That's just my batshit crazy ex-, she hates me. I'm buying a new deer rifle for the season next month, she got my old one in the settlement."
The authorities let you buy a new deer rifle. Oh, the police might investigate the crazy ex- for frivolously putting you on the list too. Once the word gets out reporting someone frivolously or maliciously will get you arrested, that crap will mostly stop too.

In the Uvalde situation this might have stopped the crazy 18-year-old in his tracks.
 
Last edited:
I am a well known enemy of the Victim Culture Cult.

Actually you are the Prime Minister of the Victim Culture Cult. You regularly schmooze with this forum's biggest victim and encourage the frequent crying and whining and poor-pitiful-me stuff.

Drink some more; your bizarre non-sequiturs are hilarious. :laugh:
 
Back
Top