Into the Night
Verified User
Maybe he's a schizo? Or to give an appearance of support. That is why we call him Sybil.
We??? Are you Dutch?
Maybe he's a schizo? Or to give an appearance of support. That is why we call him Sybil.
Sorry, Parrot, you are still ignoring the fact that- No, Global warming does not conflict the laws of thermodynamics or Stefan-Boltzman, and IN FACT, substantiates them!
Next!
We??? Are you Dutch?
The 2nd law of thermodynamics.
The 2nd law of thermodynamics.
I already did.
No, that would be YOU. It is YOU denying this theory, along with several others and several areas of mathematics.
e(t+1) >= e(t), where 'e' is entropy and 't' is time. This law defines the concept of heat, which always flows from hot to cold, NEVER the reverse. No gas or vapor in the cooler atmosphere has the capability to warm the warmer surface. You cannot use a cold object to heat a warmer one.
Not science. The term 'Polar Vortex' was created by the New York Times.
Someday when you're bored, look up Hadley cells and see they are. Then look up the position of the northern jet stream and you see it hasn't significantly changed. Indeed, Seattle is constantly wet because of it!
Also, the Polar High, when it DOES form (rather common), spins clockwise, not counterclockwise, as you have it in this diagram.
You have refuted nothing. Attempted proof by void.I already refuted your Idiocy on this matter in a prior comment!
You are the one denying science, specifically the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, so you do not intend to repeat yourself for every one of you.And I do not intend to repeat myself for every one of you Science Denying idiots.
Your stupidity and ignorance, in the matter, are not worthy for comment!
Google is not God. Don't worship it.
You discard science. I have already pointed out some of the theories of science routinely discarded by the Church of Global Warming (and you).
Correct. Climate has no value associated with it. It cannot 'change'. There is nothing that 'changes'.
Weather has temperature, wind speed, cloud cover, precip rate, visibility, humidity, etc. ALL measurable values.
There is no such thing as global weather or a global climate.
So...weather changes. Meh.
Maybe he's a schizo? Or to give an appearance of support. That is why we call him Sybil.
gfm7175 (he prefers the use of the full name) is a separate account and a different person. He also happens to be friend on various forums.
No Sir, I trust science and I am an advocate for it. For it is you that are making false claims about what Science has proven.
Next!
Who told you all this BULLSHIT?
My God, you are uneducated!
Ah, I have never understood the Sybil reference, but I just looked it up. Do his socks interact with each other? Because that would be some weird shit.
Ah, I have never understood the Sybil reference, but I just looked it up. Do his socks interact with each other? Because that would be some weird shit.
Science is an open functional system. There are no proofs in science.
You are still denying the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. You cannot hide behind what you discard.
Too bad you don't speak English.
Too bad it sucks to be you!
IIRC, they have been thanking each other and sometimes replying to each other. Gfm, like the other account, has disappeared since maybe last month.
No socks, dude. I don't need them.