Warriors will skip White House visit!

cawacko said:
Two in three years isn't clear enough? Yeah, It was torture being a Warriors fan for 30 years. The organization was among the worst in sports. That changed with new ownership and "we" are on top.
Click to expand...

When you can win 17 in 60 years, get back to me.
 
Thing1 said:
Exactly. I always kind of crack up at Boston fans who try to diminish the thrill of a victory by pointing out that whatever team you root for is still way behind them...in either football or basketball. Because in baseball, they're in the same boat. And I'm sure they were fine w/ winning that 1st WS.
Click to expand...

I don't diminish the thrill of victory. I was pointing out that the Celtics have experienced more than any other team when it comes to championships and that's not only in basketball.
 
cawacko said:
Ok I will. But in the meantime the warriors are Champs and Boston is still a piece of shit city
Click to expand...

At the rate the Warriors are going, unless we both live to be older then Methuselah, you won't be able to.

Boston may be a piece of shit city. Never been there. However, that has nothing to do with the the number of championships Boston has won compared to the Warriors.
 
CFM said:
At the rate the Warriors are going, unless we both live to be older then Methuselah, you won't be able to.

Boston may be a piece of shit city. Never been there. However, that has nothing to do with the the number of championships Boston has won compared to the Warriors.
Click to expand...

Congrats to Boston. Should the warriors not celebrate winning because Boston has more titles? What is their relevance?
 
cawacko said:
Congrats to Boston. Should the warriors not celebrate winning because Boston has more titles? What is their relevance?
Click to expand...

Never said they shouldn't celebrate. Post #125 addresses that. I addressed the long term, consistency of the Celtics vs. the short term, flash in the pan situation with the Warriors.
 
The Warriors have a history - 5 titles total, I believe. Same as the Spurs.

It wouldn't shock me at all if they win 2 or 3 more w/ this line up. Once you start to get up around 8-10 titles, that's pretty rarified air in any sport.
 
Thing1 said:
The Warriors have a history - 5 titles total, I believe. Same as the Spurs.

It wouldn't shock me at all if they win 2 or 3 more w/ this line up. Once you start to get up around 8-10 titles, that's pretty rarified air in any sport.
Click to expand...

You stick with your "Ifs" and I'll go with what the Celtics HAVE done. 17 NBA championships, which translates to 1 in every 4, is even more rarified air.
 
[FONT=&quot]
CLE.png
via Sports Logos.net
About logos
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][h=1]Cleveland Cavaliers[/h]Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Team Name: Cleveland Cavaliers

Seasons: 47; 1970-71 to 2016-17
Record: 1779-2027, .467 W-L%

Playoff Appearances: 21
Championships: 1
[/FONT]
 
Sailor said:
Not brick. Just a plain old wooden two hole. Hell, he might even have some stolen toilet seats on them! In his defense (and this is the only time, believe me) some folks just are not comfortable saying where they live on the internet.
Click to expand...
The name of the state would be good enough, does he think there will a major manhunt for him?

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Micawber said:
I miss ghetto VIP partying of my youth. Sleezy people wearing trampy tight numbers and FMPs with big hair, questionable secondary illicit business purposes of the clubs...

-Return of the mack.
Click to expand...
Oh look the preppy was down in the hood when he was younger. Did you get some brown sugar?

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
CFM said:
Never said they shouldn't celebrate. Post #125 addresses that. I addressed the long term, consistency of the Celtics vs. the short term, flash in the pan situation with the Warriors.
Click to expand...

Ok. Congrats to the Celtics for their great past. Warriors still have more titles than them over the last 25 years
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top