Warren passes Biden, takes the lead in prized Iowa poll

YALIF.

* Science isn't observations. Observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. They are evidence only. They are not a proof. They are not a theory. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
* Define 'climate change'. It doesn't mean anything.
* No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using IR from the Earth's surface.
** You cannot trap heat (1st law of thermodynamics).
** You cannot trap light (Planck's law).
** You cannot create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).
** You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).
** You cannot reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

You cannot just ignore these theories of science.

First you have no clue what scientific theory is. You have no understanding of science. It is a process of repeatable, verifiable gathering of factual evidence. No science is not truth it is a trajectory of fact gathering.
Finally by the dumb ass examples you gave you just proved you are an absolute idiot.
For example:
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using IR from the Earth's surface.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

No the atmospheric gases and water vapor are heated by the suns radiation exciting the atoms. These two particular molecules have an incredible ability to slowly dissipate i.e mother fucking E. hold that vibrated excited energy before the law of thermodynamics dissipates it, they are water and CO2. When there is an imbalance of one, specifically CO2 it holds that heated energy longer and then causes other physical phenomena in the environment to get excited, see heated molecules. This shit is basic, guy. Then you add the release of methane which has the ability to hold more excited vibrating energy before dissipating you get even more.... fucking heat. This is basic chemistry. No need for a bullshit theory. The issue is the scale of these gases in the atmosphere and at that point it's just basic math, dumb ass, not magical opinion from half assed understanding of words. According to your childish theory no star could make heat because the magical 'law of thermodynamics.

Fuck you are embarrassing.

All that's going on is trying to understand the mathematical scale of this shit and it's effect on the overall planet.

** You cannot trap light (Planck's law).

And you cannot go faster than light in a vacuum,-Theory of relativity. Also known as no shit and an irrelevant point.

** You cannot create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).

Goddamn but you are a dumb shit. No one at any point brought up anything like that. Also the energy heating the planet is from the Full spectrum electromagnetic radiation of the fucking local star called the sun. I guess according to 'Into the Stupids' Derpy understanding of 'Stience', The sun can't make heat because the FERST law of TERDOdynamics. Just, wow.

** You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).

Bahaha what the fuck are you implying? That there is some magical gas in the vacuum of space? Based on everything you've posted so far, probably.

** You cannot reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

WTF does that have to do with anything? I'm guessing you are trying to show' yur smart like' by just putting out random shit that has nothing to do with anything.
Go listen to your right wing think tank vomitoruium and let them stick there hand up your ass to move your mouth so you can meat puppet some more random bullshit and delude yourself into think you said something.

Because that shit was embarrassing.
 
First you have no clue what scientific theory is.
Science isn't a theory. It is defined using philosophy. A theory of science is a falsifiable theory. Done.
You have no understanding of science.
Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Nothing more, nothing less.
It is a process of repeatable, verifiable gathering of factual evidence.
1) Evidence is not a fact. Learn what 'fact' means.
2) Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religion does that.
3) Evidence is not a proof.
4) No theory is ever proven True, whether it's a theory of science or a non-scientific theory.
No science is not truth it is a trajectory of fact gathering.
Learn what 'fact' means. 'Fact' does not mean Universal Truth. It does not mean data. It does not mean an observation. Neither observations nor data (the result of an observation) is part of science. They are evidence only. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.
Finally by the dumb ass examples you gave you just proved you are an absolute idiot.
Argument of the stone. Bulverism fallacy. Insult fallacy.
For example:

Into the Night said:
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using IR from the Earth's surface.
WTF does that have to do with anything?
Just what it says.
No the atmospheric gases and water vapor are heated by the suns radiation exciting the atoms.
The Sun is not the surface of the Earth. Contextomy fallacy. Pay attention.
These two particular molecules have an incredible ability to slowly dissipate i.e mother fucking E. hold that vibrated excited energy
It is not possible to trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
before the law of thermodynamics dissipates it,
There is no sequence. There is always heat.
they are water and CO2.
Nothing magick about either of these materials.
When there is an imbalance of one,
Define 'balance' of CO2 and water.
specifically CO2 it holds that heated energy longer
WRONG. Both CO2 and water are just like any other material. They cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
and then causes other physical phenomena in the environment to get excited, see heated molecules.
Buzzword fallacy. Heat is simply heat.
This shit is basic, guy.
No, what you are describing is shit.
Then you add the release of methane which has the ability to hold more excited vibrating energy before dissipating you get even more.... fucking heat.
* You cannot trap heat.
* You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
* You cannot trap light.
* There is no sequence.
* You cannot create energy out of nothing.
This is basic chemistry.
No, it's not chemistry at all. CO2 is still CO2, and water is still water.
No need for a bullshit theory.
The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law are not bullshit.
The issue is the scale of these gases in the atmosphere
Scale makes no difference. Large or small scale changes NONE of these theories of science.
and at that point it's just basic math, dumb ass,
No math here, except the formalized equations resulting from the theories you are desperately trying to ignore.
not magical opinion from half assed understanding of words.
Inversion fallacy. This is YOUR problem.
According to your childish theory no star could make heat
Heat is not made. Nothing constructs heat. Heat simply exists, or it doesn't. Stars do not 'make' heat. They heat the planets in their system by radiance.
because the magical 'law of thermodynamics.
Radiance is part of the laws of thermodynamics.
Fuck you are embarrassing.
YALIF.
All that's going on is trying to understand the mathematical scale of this shit and it's effect on the overall planet.
Scale makes no difference to any law of thermodynamics or any law of Planck.
Into the Night said:
** You cannot trap light (Planck's law).
And you cannot go faster than light in a vacuum,-Theory of relativity. Also known as no shit and an irrelevant point.
Yet you are trying to describe a system that traps light. You are now in paradox.
Into the Night said:
** You cannot create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).
Goddamn but you are a dumb shit. No one at any point brought up anything like that.[/QUOTE]
You did. You did it right here in your last post with methane.
Also the energy heating the planet is from the Full spectrum electromagnetic radiation of the fucking local star called the sun.
No. UV doesn't convert to thermal energy when absorbed. Neither does visible light. They convert to ionization or chemical reactions when absorbed. Only infrared converts to thermal energy when absorbed. Most the Sun's output is infrared.
I guess according to 'Into the Stupids' Derpy understanding of 'Stience', The sun can't make heat because the FERST law of TERDOdynamics. Just, wow.
The Sun does not make heat. Nothing makes heat. Heat simply exists, or it doesn't. Heat is the flow of the thermal energy. The Sun converts thermonuclear reactions into thermal energy, which is then converted into light and radiated away into space. Thermonuclear reactions also convert directly to light.
Into the Night said:
** You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).
Bahaha what the fuck are you implying? That there is some magical gas in the vacuum of space? Based on everything you've posted so far, probably.
No, YOU are. YOU are trying to claim CO2 in the atmosphere, which is generally colder than the surface, is capable of heating the surface. That's not possible, according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Into the Night said:
** You cannot reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann law).
WTF does that have to do with anything?
You are trying to trap light. Specifically, you are trying to prevent or reduce IR from leaving Earth. This reduces the radiance of Earth. You are using this to increase the temperature of Earth. That's not possible, according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
I'm guessing you are trying to show' yur smart like' by just putting out random shit that has nothing to do with anything.
Go listen to your right wing think tank vomitoruium and let them stick there hand up your ass to move your mouth so you can meat puppet some more random bullshit and delude yourself into think you said something.

Because that shit was embarrassing.
You guessed wrong! :D
 
I/everyone is aware of that.......

She didn't have enough in those key states.

& I asked you do you think she played a part in that..

You are not required to reply......

No, I don't think she played a part in it. I think Russian trolls managed to dupe enough people with propaganda that they voted for Trump or a 3rd Party in margins that made it possible for them to change the vote totals without anyone noticing.
 
I am in Michigan. The amount of money Trump spent here is stunning. Trump ads ran all day long on every channel. Trump and the Reds have forced voter suppression across the land. It is harder to win for the left. However, Hillary lost Michigan by a vote per precinct. It was an extremely narrow victory. I would not chalk it up for Trump so easily.
 
I am in Michigan. The amount of money Trump spent here is stunning. Trump ads ran all day long on every channel. Trump and the Reds have forced voter suppression across the land. It is harder to win for the left. However, Hillary lost Michigan by a vote per precinct. It was an extremely narrow victory. I would not chalk it up for Trump so easily.

republicans have done that to voters for decades

all over the nation

if they run the state


they are cheating people of color


students


the elderly


OUT OF THEIR RIGHTS TO VOTE


the republican party hates voters


and democracy
 
So, a Native American culture thief, is now leading?

The Socialists aren’t far behind.

she has native American DNA idiot


so its fine for her to mention it


children were raised by American Indians who were found children by them


a Person raised by them would believe they were of American Indian blood all their lives


when the family talked of their history they would talk of a person they BELIEVED was full blooded Indian without realizing they were not


the fact that she didn't have as MUCH Indian blood as the family had believed they had is a very minor point


SHE HAS AMERICAN INDIGENES BLOOD


she carrys the blood



so its YOU who are lying
 
So, a fake Native American culture thief, is now leading?

The Socialists aren’t far behind.
 
The radical Democrat Socialists push Grandma off the cliff in a wheelchair.

how is it radical if she is voted in idiot


there are MORE Democratic party voters than republican party voters



that makes her ideas more mainstream than yours idiot
 
The fake Native American culture thief had to apologize for her culture theft to the Cherokee Nation.
 
I am in Michigan. The amount of money Trump spent here is stunning. Trump ads ran all day long on every channel. Trump and the Reds have forced voter suppression across the land. It is harder to win for the left. However, Hillary lost Michigan by a vote per precinct. It was an extremely narrow victory. I would not chalk it up for Trump so easily.

I am from Michigan.......nobody suppressed votes in Michigan (though there was that demmycrat who went to jail in Southfield for creating fake absentee ballots).........however, Hilliary's name on the ballot suppressed voter turn out in the east side of the state......my county (ottawa) went for Trump by more votes than his winning margin state wide........you are welcome.......by the way, how are you liking Whitmer.......remember her promise to raise gas taxes and spend trillions on roads?......she's had two years now........you guys seen any new roads over on your side of the state?......
 
“More than three months after the widely criticized decision to release the results of a DNA test to prove her Native American ancestry, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who is exploring a run for the presidency, has apologized to the Cherokee Nation, according to Julie Hubbard, a spokesperson with the Cherokee Nation.”
NPR

A Native American culture thief should never be president.
 
Michigan voted blue for President for six straight elections prior to 2016. (Being born in the G.O.A.T. I hate Michigan however I'll try to contain my anti-Michigan bias) It voted for Trump and now all these folks that previously voted blue for years are racist and influenced by Russian propaganda and somehow there was massive voter suppression.

Amazing the lengths people will go to blame anyone and anything else other than their own "side" for a loss.
 
So, a fake Native American culture thief, is now leading?

The Socialists aren’t far behind.

I bet you can explain why her heritage helped her. Her family and Warren said they have a trace on Indian blood and the DNA proved that. She was 100 percent correct.
Her family claimed they have some Indian in their history. So she assumed her family told her the truth. Like we all do. It turned out to be 5 generations back. Why does it matter? Now she knows what percentage. She is correct about the blood.
 
Back
Top