maybe you don't watch fake news.
WaPo does more Intelligence damage then Tump does -Brennan
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I've heard it at least a dozen times - and not from the deeeeep staaaaaate.
You can't really be serious that this is the 1st time you've heard it?
It's Trump's m.o., as well. If there is another reason you think he might have brought it up at that meeting, I'm all ears.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
They were talking yesterday about how people like Hannity live in a different universe from everyone else.
And the above is how they talk. None of Trump's problems are on Trump. They're the media, or the Dems, or the libs, or the Never Trumpers, or the deeeeeep staaaate. Poor Trump is doing everything right and just can't catch a break.
Trump is 100% responsible for everything that's happened in his admin.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
100%? All you're doing is playing the anti-Hannity.
You're every bit as biased as he is---you're just the polar opposite.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's projection. I'm nothing like Hannity. You & the rest of the Trump contingent on here make excuses for the Prez just like Hannity does, though.
Like this thread: the fact that Trump might have been bragging when he blabbed classified intel is WaPo's fault - not Trump's.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Oh, you're quite a bit like Hannity. You just need your own show lol.
And for every Hannity in the media there are 8-10 anti-Hannity's.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Sorry to contradict you again, but Hannity carries water for the GOP, and nothing else. I have criticized both parties for years, and didn't even vote Dem the last 2 elections.
But you? You're on here every day, defending the indefensible. It's like you're a coin-operated Trump-excuse machine. You will never hold him accountable for anything. You have even said that you think he's doing a great job right now. It is completely detached from reality.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
"My only problem with Comey's sacking was the way it was handled. Trump should have called him in the office and done it."
LOL
Ouch, Darth. What a scathing criticism. You really can't be serious w/ that...can you?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
My ONLY problem.
That's the height of criticizing Trump, apparently.
That's the height of criticizing Trump, apparently.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
You want me to go full derangement like you do lol?
You actually believe some of the crap you read. Likes he got Alzheimer's or whatever.
You have zero credibility when it comes to Trump. And again, the media is full of commentators just like yourself.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
And you don't realize that your big "criticism" was actually a defense. If your ONLY problem w/ it was a matter of technique.
And I never said that I thought or believed he had Alzheimer's. I just mentioned that it was speculation I read. I do think that he has mental health issues, however.
my god// THere is much to criticize Trump for.
his tweeting, his rank language...even this violation of Intel protocol is valid/
What you are failing to address is Brennans points, that the systematic leakage
is much more damaging then a botched protocol.
And the media just dumps out a source location to go after Trump.
You have posted all over this thread while dodging the obvious OP points.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
For starters, he claims that Trump revealed the information in "such as way as to not reveal sources and methods." Based on what I read, that doesn't seem credible, and was really the main reason for the controversy. Reports were that the information given allegedly COULD lead logically to the source, without actually naming the source. That was the reason many in the IC were mortified.
And he's far too excusing of how this information was shared. I'm sure when he did it, not only was it according to protocol, but it was well thought-out and there was a strategic reason for it. Trump is just a reckless person; I genuinely don't feel that he can be trusted with the kind of intel he gets. If you do trust him w/ that, we really haven't been observing the same person.
Last, he said the news accounts revealed more sensitive info than Trump did. WaPo was very careful to not talk about the actual information; they reported on the reveal of it, and little more than that.
So...what is he talking about w/ that?
Trump revealed the FACT of the terrorism threat. He didn't go into how it was sourced ( though the coverage mostly is very unclear on this..agreed)..
Brennan ( unlike Clapper) really is non-partisan and a straight shooter. The criticism of him was the Obama "kill list" where he advocated signature strikes to accomplish that.
But he's much more correct here, that WaPo's publishing what is a LEAK exposes the Source's location
If there was no leak, there would not have been this damage -what was Russia going to do even if it knew the source location? why would it do anything?
Again you focus on the protocol,while missing the true damage inflicted by publishing leaks
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I'm not being snarky, but can you flesh out the bolded a bit? What did they reveal that could lead to the source? From what I read, they didn't reveal any of the actual intel or any information about what the specifics of it were - which is the information that could lead to the source.
Funny, the Washington Post was asked to refrain from publishing the information Rump simply gave to the Russians. The Post agreed and withed Rump simply gave it away.
What information did the Post release that harmed the United States? What information did the Post release that harmed anything but Rumps future in politics?