Walmart protesters = SEIU Rent-A-Mob

I don't know about that, WOM. A mob succeeded in interfering with the vote count in Florida in 2000 and look what kind of idiot was appointed to the Presidency because of it. Democrats and any low wage American needs to take heed from that lesson. Power is in the loud voices of those that seek change for their own benefit. I use mine often as I seek truth, justice and the American way. I usually don't run into any millionaires out there protesting in opposition to me but their stupid hired guns are always there. And most of the time they are the very hired guns that call themselves municipal servants sworn to protect and serve ME. I could write you a book about all that but I doubt you could comprehend it or even try to read it.

Instead of contemplating writing a book, you'd do well to read a couple, and turn off MSNBC, idiot.
 
If that is all you have to say on this topic then I am happy to say from an intelligent point of view that it is you that is the idiot, bravo.
 
We need more union thugs, not less. One huge problem over the past few decades is that the Unions have lost their balls.

I've got all the balls I've ever had in these Union affairs as do most of my brother and sister Union members. We don't have the money or resources that the corporations do but we do our best with what little we have to work with. I never understand the reluctance or refusal of anyone to admit that the ordinary employee needs at least as much representation as the individual or policy that is screwing them over. Let's face it. Why do disgruntled employees become disgruntled? 99.9% of the time they have a very valid point that is shared with a large majority of the employees that are also being negatively affected. Individually not much happens. Collectively they at least have a prayers chance in hell. Can you dig it?
 
Because Fox, Breitbart, Beck etc. says so and it's today's meme to spread around for the gullible zombies.
Never any complaints when the Koch funded buses full of teabaggers were making their way across the country to attend events, though.
 
Of course not, that's completely different and ultimately 'fair'....

Biggest difference there is that the Koch teabagger transplants were being well paid for their time and travel. Liberals do it for the love of justice and appreciation of the cause.
 
Biggest difference there is that the Koch teabagger transplants were being well paid for their time and travel. Liberals do it for the love of justice and appreciation of the cause.

Yes, the T=baggers are an astroturf organization, always were. Wingers will never get it.
 
Now lets get back to the point I made to Bravo that states, just because people critize Zionists, does NOT make them anti-semetic. Especially if they have a legitimate argument.

Funny, whenever anyone criticizes Obama, according to your ilk that makes them anti black and racist. Care to explain the difference?
 
Yes 'cull' they want blood. I don't know how these kinds of threats and talk of violence go over with the mods but I find this troubling on a political forum. Since when are threats of violence acceptable?
 
They get it fine, they just lie about it because they are lying liars (except for the dumb ones like Bravo).

I agree that they know and just come here to spew their hate and propaganda and 'beat up libruls'......(their take)....it's why it's a waste of time to engage with them. They're a subversive element like all the little Liberty educated plants in the CIA, FBI, Justice Department etc. They are on a mission to "take their country back" to the 14th century where we'll all be homogenous in our beliefs and face a year in jail (or worse) if we don't swear allegiance to dominionist Jesus.
 
Yes 'cull' they want blood. I don't know how these kinds of threats and talk of violence go over with the mods but I find this troubling on a political forum. Since when are threats of violence acceptable?

Since when are threats of violence against fellow americans speaking their opinion acceptable on any level?

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". Patrick Henry
 
Funny, whenever anyone criticizes Obama, according to your ilk that makes them anti black and racist. Care to explain the difference?

There is no difference. Sometimes it is warranted, some times it is not. Just like the label anti-semetic is not warranted against me. I criticise everyone, and some even more so when it is meritted.

I can only speak for myself. My ilk does not support any wordly political party. I beleive that everyone who supports a party, supports it, because it serves their personal interests. I on the other hand do not support any party, and my interests are the social advancement of the human race.Therefore I do not tow party lines. I sometimes agree with the republicans and sometimes agree with the democrats and am not afraid to step out of party ranks. And that is the way it should be. Americans are too polarized. Most are either far right or far left(usually because they have money/interests invested in a party). There is no compromise. No meeting each other half way. There has to be more centralists.
 
In other words, your too lazy to check. That's like me saying that the sky is blue and you saying,"do you have a source"?lol


I didn't think I needed a "source' for well known Churchill quotes.lol Just google it. Anyone that can read English, KNOWS you've been owned on every debate.lol


Now lets get back to the point I made to Bravo that states, just because people critize Zionists, does NOT make them anti-semetic. Especially if they have a legitimate argument.

You're job is provide sources of your information. This is an adult political forum.

Israel is a sovereign democratic nation. Hamas isn't, and is a terrorist organization. Which one do you support?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top