VP responsible for the bud light boycott is out

T. A. Gardner said:
I actually liked the "New" Coke. They should have introduced it, and sold it as an alternative to their original version rather than replace one with the other. They might have gotten more sales that way. Those that liked the old product could still buy it. Those that liked the new but not necessarily the old--it was a damn sight better than Pepsi--could buy the new version.
Click to expand...

It was better, back in the day, when it had real coke in it. The New Coke was too sweet. Probably for future Bud Light drinkers.
 
Doc Dutch said:
It was better, back in the day, when it had real coke in it. The New Coke was too sweet. Probably for future Bud Light drinkers.
Click to expand...

To each his own. I found new Coke to my liking. It was far less sweet than Pepsi and had a unique flavor mixed in. Of course, since I don't drink soda much, and don't indulge in watered down cat piss, none of this was any sort of big deal to me...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
To each his own. I found new Coke to my liking. It was far less sweet than Pepsi and had a unique flavor mixed in. Of course, since I don't drink soda much, and don't indulge in watered down cat piss, none of this was any sort of big deal to me...
Click to expand...

It was a very big deal for most, if not all, the JPP Trumpers.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Okay, if you say so, but not being a "JPP Trumper" it isn't for me...
Click to expand...

It's walks like a Trumper and talks like a Trumper.....

donald-trump-trump.gif
 
T. A. Gardner said:
And, there it is there. Bud Lite had a big consumer base built on a particular market segment that identified with the product. This VP threw that out the window and replaced it with an out-of-touch, really radical Leftist viewpoint using a spokesperson that represents less than 1% of America and was the antithesis of the previous views of the customer base. A negative reaction should have been expected.

It wasn't Bud Lite's consumer base that was out-of-touch, but rather the VP who was stupid enough to think that they could rebrand Bud Lite to compete with niche products like Zema (aka "Queer beer") rather than focus on selling to like-minded persons in their existing market segment that were now drinking competing light beers, like Miller-Coors, and that the whole exercise would have only a positive impact on sales.
Click to expand...

Exactly, 100 percent.

The loss of sales was due to pushing a far left, perverted agenda about trans freaks (.2% of the population). Promoting that base won't sell Bud Light.

Her responsibility was to produce more sales of Bud Light, not less.

She failed and was canned.

It's not complicated, as some on this forum try to make it.
 
Jarod said:
Where in that video does she literally say the customers were not good enough? She did say she wanted to add new customers... not exclude the old customer.
Click to expand...

If the fratty customers of bud light were good enough then why "evolve"? You sound like a clingy desperate girlfriend. Anyone with comprehension skills knows exactly what she meant and she paid the price for alienating bud lights customer base. Maybe now its her turn to "evolve" but I suspect she will blame the boycotters. Leftists have no ability or willingness to self assess their positions.
 
Yakuda said:
If the fratty customers of bud light were good enough then why "evolve"? You sound like a clingy desperate girlfriend. Anyone with comprehension skills knows exactly what she meant and she paid the price for alienating bud lights customer base. Maybe now its her turn to "evolve" but I suspect she will blame the boycotters. Leftists have no ability or willingness to self assess their positions.
Click to expand...

You evolve, as she said, to bring in more, you do not have to exclude the original to try for more groups.
 
Jarod said:
You evolve, as she said, to bring in more, you do not have to exclude the original to try for more groups.
Click to expand...

Is this another case of leftists changing the definition of a word to fit the circumstances? Just like biden with the, "you ain't black" comment she said what she meant and the people who heard her, the frat boys, knew exactly what she meant. Why do you people do this? You overplay your hand and then when you get called out it's stuttering and stammering about what you supposedly "really" meant. Everybody knew exactly what she meant.
 
Yakuda said:
Is this another case of leftists changing the definition of a word to fit the circumstances? Just like biden with the, "you ain't black" comment she said what she meant and the people who heard her, the frat boys, knew exactly what she meant. Why do you people do this? You overplay your hand and then when you get called out it's stuttering and ztammerjng about what you supposedly really meant. Everybody knew exactly what she meant.
Click to expand...

Its clear what she meant, you should watch the video. She was talking about bringing in a broader base, not excluding anyone. You guys hate that.
 
Jarod said:
Its clear what she meant, you should watch the video. She was talking about bringing in a broader base, not excluding anyone. You guys hate that.
Click to expand...

I have watched it and she most assuredly wanted to get bud light as far away from that frat boy image as she could. She said bud light was losing money needed to attract a "younger" crowd or bud light wouldnt last. The image she chose to attract those "younger" consumers was Dylan Mulvaney. The antithesis of their fratty customer base. If you think that didnt speak "fuck off" to bud lights base then now we know why she lost ber job. You people have no capacity whatsoever to consider that peopke might just not agree with your ideology and then you get pissy when they do.
 
Yakuda said:
I have watched it and she most assuredly wanted to get bud light as far away from that frat boy image as she could. She said bud light was losing money needed to attract a "younger" crowd or bud light wouldnt last. The image she chose to attract those "younger" consumers was Dylan Mulvaney. The antithesis of their fratty customer base. If you think that didnt speak "fuck off" to bud lights base then now we know why she lost ber job. You people have no capacity whatsoever to consider that peopke might just not agree with your ideology and then you get pissy when they do.
Click to expand...

I am sure the "base" took it that way, they are fragile, scared and weak and look for the slightest offence. They know how thin their world view is and how its crumbling.
 
RB 60 said:
Everyone who disagrees with him is a Trumper, terrorist, traitor, white supremacist, etc... Didn't you know that?
Click to expand...

Not everyone, Arbie. Some are just dumbass losers living with their mother while whining to the world how it's not their fault.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top