APP - Voter suppression in Texas - focusing on women now

tekkychick

New member
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alex-palombo/what-19th-amendment_b_4124137.html

t's a trend lately, that if a party is afraid of losing an election, they pass legislation barring key groups in their opponents' base from voting. And clearly, it's something Texas has taken to heart. Right after Wendy Davis declared that she was running for governor, Texas Republicans set out to disenfranchise women from voting, 19th Amendment be damned.

And the way they're keeping ladies out of the voting booth it is a doozy.

From The New Civil Rights Movement:

As of November 5, Texans must show a photo ID with their up-to-date legal name. It sounds like such a small thing, but according to the Brennan Center for Justice, only 66 percent of voting age women have ready access to a photo document that will attest to proof of citizenship. This is largely because young women have not updated their documents with their married names, a circumstance that doesn't affect male voters in any significant way. Suddenly 34 percent of women voters are scrambling for an acceptable ID, while 99 percent of men are home free.​


Adding another wrinkle to the plan, women in Texas must show original documents of the name change: a marriage certificate, a divorce certificate, or a court-ordered name change certificate -- and no photocopies are allowed. This leaves women in Texas either scrambling to gather the proper paperwork and get their ID in order before the registration cut-off, or leaves them unable to vote.

As ThinkProgress points out, getting approved copies of these documents is often expensive or difficult for many, especially low-income women, to obtain:


Constituents must show original documents verifying legal proof of a name change, whether it is a marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered change -- they are prevented from using photocopies. In the absence of original documents, voters must pay a minimum of $20 to receive new copies. Due to inflexible work schedules and travel expenses, voters often opt to have their documents mailed, incurring additional costs.​


Similar to how poor, minority, and elderly voters in Pennsylvania had trouble getting to the DMV to obtain a state ID or driver's license before the election, women in Texas are having trouble getting an acceptable photo ID that matches their most current name.

The clear argument for this law is that people prove who they are to vote -- that they are citizens, that they live where they say the live and are who they claim to be. The clear argument against this law is that it specifically targets women in a year where a controversial, pro-choice woman is running for the highest office in a state with a conservative, pro-life dominated government. The timing isn't an accident.

This law comes after a summer showdown in the state house over abortion restrictions, where Davis stood for hours telling the stories of Texas women who made the agonizing decision to terminate their pregnancies. When the state government went ahead with passing the restrictions -- despite the law being passed after midnight, despite the cries of thousands of men and women who stood strong in the state house lobby protesting the decision, despite the entire country watching the fight on CNN, Twitter, and YouTube -- Davis' popularity and reputation for fighting for women soared. Rick Perry has a reason to be scared of Davis, his own popularity with women is low, most likely due to his strict reproductive health restrictions, gutting of childcare funding, and opposition to equal pay.

Texas clearly isn't afraid of shutting people out on Election Day -- just hours after the Supreme Court knocked down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act this past summer, Texas declared that its new voter ID law and redistricting plan were effective immediately. This move gerrymandered the state even more in favor of conservative legislators, and shut out thousands of poor, elderly, minority, and student voters without proper ID. Added with this move to cut thousands of women out of the voting pool, I have to ask: who exactly is left to vote in Texas?

It seems that if the Tea Party gets their way, the only people left to vote will be wealthy white men. And while that is exactly what the Founding Fathers did back in Revolutionary War times, fortunately, our country has come a long way since then. We have fought too hard for voter inclusion to bar people from the polls because they don't vote the way we like them to. We live in a representative democracy where everyone's voice should be heard. If Texas Republicans want to beat Wendy Davis at the polls, they shouldn't keep women out of the polling places; they should pick a better candidate than Rick Perry.
 
What is so hard about changing your name.

Why do lefties hate having someone prove who they say they are? Seems like such a little thing. Guess lefties don't like honest elections.
 
We should allow texas to secede so Mexico can conqueor them and we dont have to put up with the lunacy :)
 
Adding another wrinkle to the plan, women in Texas must show original documents of the name change: a marriage certificate, a divorce certificate, or a court-ordered name change certificate -- and no photocopies are allowed. This leaves women in Texas either scrambling to gather the proper paperwork and get their ID in order before the registration cut-off, or leaves them unable to vote
.

As ThinkProgress points out, getting approved copies of these documents is often expensive or difficult for many, especially low-income women, to obtain:


Constituents must show original documents verifying legal proof of a name change, whether it is a marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered change -- they are prevented from using photocopies. In the absence of original documents, voters must pay a minimum of $20 to receive new copies. Due to inflexible work schedules and travel expenses, voters often opt to have their documents mailed, incurring additional costs.
i could live with voter ID, but is has to be convenient, and free of charge for those who can't afford it, and transporation. to receive it -no cost for indigent.

This is way excessive.
 
What we need in this country is a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to vote to all and ensuring that all requirements are national and eliminating all the bullshit that each state gets to now present whenever they want to disenfranchise another group! This is ridiculous and an assault on all women, because this same tactic can be put into practice for all women in any other state where a strong woman candidate excites the voters and scare the hell out of the right wing men! And to think that in 1960 about a quarter of the delegates at the Republican National Convention were women (the most women at any national convention ever) and many of them moderate women and now the Republicans have declared war on all women no matter their political position. It's a testament to the determination of the Republicans and the conservatives in the party to make sure that nothing slows down their desire to make it as hard as possible for the women of Texas to elect one of their own.
 
If Rick Scott loses his Gov in Fla it will be because of his botched voter suppression scheme and his allowing every single corporate identity, insurance co and Utility to stick it to every floridian his entire time as Gov that guy has GOT TO GO imho hes garbage
 
It's a pretty pathetic ploy but women should be responsible enough to ensure their own rights to vote. The Republicans cant take it away from them if they dont let them.
 
If Rick Scott loses his Gov in Fla it will be because of his botched voter suppression scheme and his allowing every single corporate identity, insurance co and Utility to stick it to every floridian his entire time as Gov that guy has GOT TO GO imho hes garbage
Scott is Tea Party quality "garbage".

Problem is the Democrats in Florida, can never get organized, rally around a candidate, and fundraise (though they are getting better at fundraising).
Charlie Christ (former Republican governor) is now seen as the Dem's best shot..pathetic
 
It's a pretty pathetic ploy but women should be responsible enough to ensure their own rights to vote. The Republicans cant take it away from them if they dont let them.

it is not that they are taking the right to vote away, but that they are making it more difficult...for women but not men
 
Annata I believe slow but surely florida is having an awakening, theres been too many things since scott got elected for them to ignore, he is extremely unpopular here.
 

As America and more and more areas of the country revert more and more to some kind of increasingly permanent right wing rule, some people here would do well to conaider this oft repeated statement and consider it long and hard!

Martin Niemöller (1892-1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps.

Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.


The quotation stems from Niemöller's lectures during the early postwar period. Different versions of the quotation exist. These can be attributed to the fact that Niemöller spoke extemporaneously and in a number of settings.
 
it is not that they are taking the right to vote away, but that they are making it more difficult...for women but not men

I know, I meant the last sentence with a more long-term view. Dont take advantage of your rights and you might eventually lose them.
 
As America and more and more areas of the country revert more and more to some kind of increasingly permanent right wing rule, some people here would do well to conaider this oft repeated statement and consider it long and hard!

Martin Niemöller (1892-1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps.

Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.


The quotation stems from Niemöller's lectures during the early postwar period. Different versions of the quotation exist. These can be attributed to the fact that Niemöller spoke extemporaneously and in a number of settings.

I love that quote.
 
Back
Top