Vitter should not resign

just pile on the lies huh zappygetard....i edited because it was a mistake. you have yet to show where i asked for weiner to resign. that is your claim, that i asked for weiner to resign but not vitter. you claimed that was two faced, yet, you dishonestly go off on a tangent and move the goal posts. further, this thread is tongue in cheek.

now, find where i said weiner should resign or admit you lied. i'll even give you that i said vitter should not. unless you find where i said weiner should, your claim is complete fabrication. but i doubt you will come back and admit it.

Deletes sections from previous posts to cover his duplicitous lies and now he thinks I'm going to waste one second of my time searching for something he's almost certainly deleted by now...

Nice try Yurskin, but you've displayed a pattern of behavior which suggests you've been less than truthful...and that's just not MY problem.
 
Deletes sections from previous posts to cover his duplicitous lies and now he thinks I'm going to waste one second of my time searching for something he's almost certainly deleted by now...

Nice try Yurskin, but you've displayed a pattern of behavior which suggests you've been less than truthful...and that's just not MY problem.

what lie? i knew you would ignore the second post and take this thread seriously, so i edited my post. the edited had NOTHING to do with your claim that i was two faced, as i changed nothing with regards to weiner. how can i now delete some post you claim i made a while ago? you are a pathetic liar. i never claimed weiner should resign. you can't find the post because you lied about what i said.

what a colassal failure....now the asshole can make claims all day and then claim that the person deleted the post. seriously, what a loser.
 
what lie? i knew you would ignore the second post and take this thread seriously, so i edited my post. the edited had NOTHING to do with your claim that i was two faced, as i changed nothing with regards to weiner. how can i now delete some post you claim i made a while ago? you are a pathetic liar. i never claimed weiner should resign. you can't find the post because you lied about what i said.

what a colassal failure....now the asshole can make claims all day and then claim that the person deleted the post. seriously, what a loser.


Ahhhhh...but the lie was in the edited portion of the post.

You claimed in the OP of this thread that Vitter should NOT resign...just show me a post where you claim that Weiner should NOT resign and you're in the clear.

Of course if you can't...that would explain why you deleted certain comments from an earlier post of yours, as it proved you are indeed a two-faced liar..
 
Ahhhhh...but the lie was in the edited portion of the post.

You claimed in the OP of this thread that Vitter should NOT resign...just show me a post where you claim that Weiner should NOT resign and you're in the clear.

Of course if you can't...that would explain why you deleted certain comments from an earlier post of yours, as it proved you are indeed a two-faced liar..

this is exactly why i edited my post. because i knew you would dishonestly IGNORE the second post. this thread is tongue in cheek, but i didn't want to distract the issue of your LIE with arguing about that. but what have you done...you have focused on that and run away from your claim that i said weiner should resign.

you made the claim i am two faced. it is up to YOU to prove your claim. so far, you have wasted time on a non-issue. show where i said weiner should resign. if you can't, i'll take that as your tacit admission that you lied.
 
this is exactly why i edited my post. because i knew you would dishonestly IGNORE the second post. this thread is tongue in cheek, but i didn't want to distract the issue of your LIE with arguing about that. but what have you done...you have focused on that and run away from your claim that i said weiner should resign.

you made the claim i am two faced. it is up to YOU to prove your claim. so far, you have wasted time on a non-issue. show where i said weiner should resign. if you can't, i'll take that as your tacit admission that you lied.

You know...it's odd...but I can't seem to find one single post in this thread where I claim you said Weiner should resign...

You wouldn't make up some ridiculous bullshit like that just to dodge admitting you'd gotten caught in another llie, now would you?

Or was this another example of the Amazing Yurskin reaching into someone's mind and telling everyone else what they MEANT to say?
 
Who wants him to resign?

I think it would be PERFECT if he remained in Congress right up to election day so Liberals from coast to coast can draw comparison after comparison as to how they are men of their words and not "do as I say and not as I do" hypocrites like the Republicans have demonstrated themselves to be over and over.

Weiner sent pix to another woman and Righties demanded he resign...yet Vitter has ADMITTED to violating the sacred trust of both GOD and his WIFE by sleeping with hookers, yet two faced Righties like Yurt don't want him to retire...


There's my first post in this thread...no evidence of me claiming Yurt said Weiner should resign...


why do you lie so much? did i say i wanted weiner to resign? link to the posts or admit you lied again.

simple really.


There's the Amazing Yurskin claiming he never said he wanted Weiner to resign...of course it's already missing the part that Yurt edited out because it proved he was lying.


this is exactly why i edited my post. because i knew you would dishonestly IGNORE the second post. this thread is tongue in cheek, but i didn't want to distract the issue of your LIE with arguing about that. but what have you done...you have focused on that and run away from your claim that i said weiner should resign.

you made the claim i am two faced. it is up to YOU to prove your claim. so far, you have wasted time on a non-issue. show where i said weiner should resign. if you can't, i'll take that as your tacit admission that you lied.


Now here he is again still claiming I made statements that just aren't there...of course he could be using his "Amazing Mental Powers" to tell me what he thinks I MEANT to say, but the more obvious answer is Yurt's just a lying asswipe.
 
you are such a pathetic liar and a loser:

Weiner sent pix to another woman and Righties demanded he resign...yet Vitter has ADMITTED to violating the sacred trust of both GOD and his WIFE by sleeping with hookers, yet two faced Righties like Yurt don't want him to retire...

what am i two faced about zappa?
 
You weren't mentioned until I was discussing Vitter...show me again where you allege I claimed you said Weiner should resign?

Weiner sent pix to another woman and Righties demanded he resign...yet Vitter has ADMITTED to violating the sacred trust of both GOD and his WIFE by sleeping with hookers, yet two faced Righties like Yurt don't want him to retire...

what am i two faced about zappa?
 
what am i two faced about zappa?

Weiner sent pix to another woman and Righties demanded he resign...yet Vitter has ADMITTED to violating the sacred trust of both GOD and his WIFE by sleeping with hookers, yet two faced Righties like Yurt don't want him to retire..

The highlighted line is CLEARLY referring to Senator Vitter...but you go right on pretending I was discussing Congressman Weiner when I made that comment.
 
Weiner sent pix to another woman and Righties demanded he resign...yet Vitter has ADMITTED to violating the sacred trust of both GOD and his WIFE by sleeping with hookers, yet two faced Righties like Yurt don't want him to retire..

The highlighted line is CLEARLY referring to Senator Vitter...but you go right on pretending I was discussing Congressman Weiner when I made that comment.

i seriously cannot believe the lies and length you will go to in order not not admit you're wrong or lied. you claimed i am two faced when it comes to vitter and weiner -- that necessarily means i hold OPPOSITE views for both people. that necessarily means i want weiner to resign and not vitter.

you are a lousy liar. it is actually boring proving your lies. i mean really....do you think people don't know what two faced means? "righties demanded he resign" "yet, two faced righties like yurt don't want him to retire"

i cannot believe you're NOW claiming you didn't mean that i wanted weiner to resign. even after you made the above statement and subsequently reinforced the statement with this statement:

just show me a post where you claim that Weiner should NOT resign and you're in the clear

you're "not" claiming it, yet, you ask that i provide a post where i said weiner should not resign and then <-- i would be in the "clear"
 
i seriously cannot believe the lies and length you will go to in order not not admit you're wrong or lied. you claimed i am two faced when it comes to vitter and weiner -- that necessarily means i hold OPPOSITE views for both people. that necessarily means i want weiner to resign and not vitter.

you are a lousy liar. it is actually boring proving your lies. i mean really....do you think people don't know what two faced means? "righties demanded he resign" "yet, two faced righties like yurt don't want him to retire"

i cannot believe you're NOW claiming you didn't mean that i wanted weiner to resign. even after you made the above statement and subsequently reinforced the statement with this statement:



you're "not" claiming it, yet, you ask that i provide a post where i said weiner should not resign and then <-- i would be in the "clear"

Say it once...say it a thousand times...it still brings you no closer to the truth.

You can pretend I was referring to you when I mentioned "righties demanded he resign..."

But unless you see your name specifically mentioned, then all you're doing is assuming...and making up more Yurskin nonsense.

The facts are that you STARTED a thread saying Vitter should NOT resign...but there is no similarly titled thread saying congressman Weiner should NOT resign.

And therein lies your double standard...not that I expect you to understand it this, the 527th time I've explained it to you.
 
Say it once...say it a thousand times...it still brings you no closer to the truth.

You can pretend I was referring to you when I mentioned "righties demanded he resign..."

But unless you see your name specifically mentioned, then all you're doing is assuming...and making up more Yurskin nonsense.

The facts are that you STARTED a thread saying Vitter should NOT resign...but there is no similarly titled thread saying congressman Weiner should NOT resign.

And therein lies your double standard...not that I expect you to understand it this, the 527th time I've explained it to you.

are you finally admitting that your two faced comment was me saying vitter should not resign and weiner should?

you have yet to explain what you meant by "two faced"

and you, again, reinforce your statement by - again - calling attention to me saying vitter should not resign VS me not saying weiner should not resign. even though you're a dishonest shit who has ignored my second post in this thread, you still CANNOT explain or answer what you meant by two faced. why is that?
 
Vitter should not resign

no.jpg

 
Back
Top