Vindman Tried to Alter Call Transcript. Failed

domer76 said:
Better look up the difference between a transcript and a summary, Illiterate fuck.

At the same time, find out what ... means.

Fucking moron.
Click to expand...

I think you should try to extract your head from your asshole so that you know what a transcript means. ;)
 
domer76 said:
Better look up the difference between a transcript and a summary,
Click to expand...

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation. (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A number of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the record, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation.

The word "inaudible" is used to indicate portions of a conversation that the note taker was unable to hear.

Not a summary; transcript.


Definition of transcript

1a : a written, printed, or typed copy especially : a usually typed copy of dictated or recorded material
b : an official or legal and often published copy a court reporter's transcript especially : an official copy of a student's educational record
 
Truth Detector said:
I think you should try to extract your head from your asshole so that you know what a transcript means. ;)
Click to expand...

I can’t fix your illiteracy, cunt.

Well, I’ll be.

“CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the record, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation.

The word "inaudible" is used to indicate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
 
domer76 said:
I can’t fix your illiteracy, cunt.

Well, I’ll be.

“CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the record, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation.

The word "inaudible" is used to indicate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
Click to expand...

Transcript. ;)
 
Truth Detector said:
CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation. (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A number of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the record, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation.

The word "inaudible" is used to indicate portions of a conversation that the note taker was unable to hear.

Not a summary; transcript.


Definition of transcript

1a : a written, printed, or typed copy especially : a usually typed copy of dictated or recorded material
b : an official or legal and often published copy a court reporter's transcript especially : an official copy of a student's educational record
Click to expand...

Not a verbatim transcript. That’s right, cunt.

A summary
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You will *never* see a smoking gun because you don't want to, unless the barrel is pointed at someone with a (D) after their name. This decorated active military office who managed to stay at his position through changes of administrations is deeply concerned about the POTUS violating the Constitution -- and you still think he's lying because he worked with (D)s in his career. I looked up his bio and did not see anything about his political leanings. You have a credible link?

As for those he reported his alarms to -- how on earth would anyone know if they are honest, what they did about the information, and their loyalties (or not) to Trump? I suppose that will come out in the hearings. All we've heard so far as Cliff Notes synopsis of what testimony was given. We DO know, however, that enough ppl were also alarmed by the call to the point where the transcript was hidden on a secure server. Why would that happen if it's a nothingburger?

A person of integrity working for/with the govt. is honor-bound to report wrongdoing, IMO, even if the sympathize with the wrongdoer. Don't you agree? Now if you think that the POTUS, hearing a conspiracy theory about his rival(s), should be able to use the power of his elected office to get information on his rival(s) by appealing to foreign governments in exchange for American goodies then you are wrong. I don't care what letter comes after their name, wrong is wrong.
Click to expand...

deeply concerned about the POTUS violating the Constitution -- and you still think he's lying because he worked with (D)s in his career. I looked up his bio and did not see anything about his political leanings. You have a credible link?
Click to expand...

There you go trying to put words in my mouth. I NEVER called him a liar. I do question his motives. BTW his decorations are no higher than mine.

Several publications have reported Vindman as a registered Democrat. I'm surprised you couldn't find it.

He stated he reported his "concerns" to his superiors twice. My concern is why did he go over his superiors heads when they didn't take action. That alone makes it look like he has an ax to grind.

We will see now that the enquiry is being made public.
 
domer76 said:
Not a verbatim transcript. That’s right, cunt.

A summary
Click to expand...

It's not a summary you illiterate punk. It is a transcript. It is done as the conversation takes place. A summary doesn't do anything of the sort. You didn't get past grade school did you?

summary
a brief account of the main points of something; outline, précis, synopsis: Please provide a summary of the book.
 
Truth Detector said:
It's not a summary you illiterate punk. It is a transcript. It is done as the conversation takes place. A summary doesn't do anything of the sort. You didn't get past grade school did you?

summary
a brief account of the main points of something; outline, précis, synopsis: Please provide a summary of the book.
Click to expand...

Transcript:

a written copy of the exact words that someone said.
 
dukkha said:
do you recall the constant leaks of POTUS phone calls ? Think maybe that's why the call notes were put on a higher classification server (no "hidden").

vindman was put into the NSC by Rice -he didn't "manage to stay" he wasn't a known problem beforehand.

HE WAS ADVISING UKRAINE GOV'T on Gulliani -does that bother you? it sure as hell does me.
claptrap..at most it was a CFR violation
Click to expand...

What was he allegedly advising them about Trump's private-attorney-who-does-not-have-any-standing-in-the-administration-other-than-that? Or doesn't that bother YOU -- that a private attorney is doing the nation's diplomatic business and probably has access to classified material, minus a corresponding security clearance? Even absent the national security aspects of the Guiliani-Barr-Ukrainian conversations and meetings, you should be disturbed, if not outraged, that we have a POTUS who thinks this is how to do things.

Yeah, but if Obama.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top