Vigilante gun Nut KILLS Innocent Man

Taichiliberal said:
One or two cops in uniform armed with batons. tasers and guns are more likely to confront and force a perp like this to an arrest rather than a fatal shooting. An untrained civilian is more likely to get the results in the story. If getting killed for boosting a what, less than $10 worth of merchandise is acceptable to some folk, then our society is indeed on the highway to hell.
Click to expand...

Michael Brown's family might disagree with you.

Michael Brown did the same stupid shit this guy did... Charged a man with a gun. Both are dead.
 
cawacko said:
Isn't the whole point of #BLM that cops kill people like this instead of just arresting them?
Click to expand...

Actually, BLM is saying that the continuing/increasing incidents of cops killing BLACK people as opposed to non-black folk FOR THE SAME OFFENSE is the problem. That being said, you have justified shootings of perps by cops in the aforementioned scenario, but tasers are usually the first line of defense.
 
Superfreak said:
Look to at your knee jerk reactions to Martin and Brown. You were flat out wrong. The difference between Rice and MacDonald is that they didn't commit a crime. Martin, Brown and this clown DID.
Click to expand...

Really LOL.
Martin's self defense was criminal?
STFU Stupidfreak.
 
Superfreak said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
One or two cops in uniform armed with batons. tasers and guns are more likely to confront and force a perp like this to an arrest rather than a fatal shooting. An untrained civilian is more likely to get the results in the story. If getting killed for boosting a what, less than $10 worth of merchandise is acceptable to some folk, then our society is indeed on the highway to hell.
Click to expand...


Michael Brown's family might disagree with you.

Michael Brown did the same stupid shit this guy did... Charged a man with a gun. Both are dead.
Click to expand...

and since the Brown incident resulted in an investigation dealing with UNNECESSARY EXCESSIVE AND DEADLY FORCE.
What Did Federal Investigators Find?

In a scathing report issued in March, the Justice Department called on Ferguson to overhaul its criminal justice system, declaring that the city had engaged in so many constitutional violations that they could be corrected only by abandoning its entire approach to policing, retraining its employees and establishing new oversight. The report described a city that used its police and courts as moneymaking ventures, a place where officers stopped and handcuffed people without probable cause, hurled racial slurs, used stun guns without provocation, and treated anyone as suspicious merely for questioning police tactics. Shortly after the report was issued, Thomas Jackson, the embattled police chief, stepped down.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...fter-police-shooting.html?_r=0#investigations

The LAST thing we need is a bunch of yahoo citizens repeating such.
 
Superfreak said:
Moron... Martin was not defending himself. He attacked Zimmerman. He initiated the confrontation. He does not have the right to pound someones head into the ground.
Click to expand...

Freak, you are stubborn to the point of insipidness as the FACTS PROVE THAT ZIMMERMAN INITIATED THE ENTIRE INCIDENT WHEN HE STARTED TAILING MARTIN, WAS DISCOVERED, TOLD NOT TO FOLLOW FURTHER, AND CONTINUED TO DO SO. His injuries were NOT as dire as he wanted all to believe....and the bottom line was Martin had a final altercation with a ARMED stranger tailing him FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN SUSPICION. Deal with it.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Freak, you are stubborn to the point of insipidness as the FACTS PROVE THAT ZIMMERMAN INITIATED THE ENTIRE INCIDENT WHEN HE STARTED TAILING MARTIN, WAS DISCOVERED, TOLD NOT TO FOLLOW FURTHER, AND CONTINUED TO DO SO. His injuries were NOT as dire as he wanted all to believe....and the bottom line was Martin had a final altercation with a ARMED stranger tailing him FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN SUSPICION. Deal with it.
Click to expand...

His latest Twitter ordeal, the ex girlfriend also confirmed, once again, that Zimmerman is a racist and he confirmed he is a bigot.
 
Superfreak said:
Again... stop using terms if you don't know what they mean. THEY SAW HIM STEAL IT. Pretending he is innocent is moronic.
Click to expand...

Caught using yet another logical fallacy, SF immediately pivots back to his petty personal attacks in a desperate attempt to avoid admitting how wrong he is.
 
Superfreak said:
Moron... Martin was not defending himself. He attacked Zimmerman. He initiated the confrontation. He does not have the right to pound someones head into the ground.
Click to expand...



SF: Zimmerman HAD EVERY RIGHT to defend himself when he felt threatened.

Martin...not so much.
 
Superfreak said:
Look to at your knee jerk reactions to Martin and Brown. You were flat out wrong. The difference between Rice and MacDonald is that they didn't commit a crime. Martin, Brown and this clown DID.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we knew that after the fact. The cops alleged that they were being "threatened" by a toy gun and a knife and that's why those shootings were justified. The cops weren't just cruising the neighborhood and shooting citizens at random.
 
Rune said:
Zim followed him.
Martin was an innocent child murdered by Zim.
Click to expand...

Yes... Zim followed him... Zim lost him... Martin came back and confronted Zim. Martin then attacked Zim. Martin then beat Zims head against the ground.

He was not innocent by any stretch of the imagination. That said, I am not going to redebate the criminal actions of Martin over and over and over again. You are wrong. Period. He was not murdered, a jury determined that. You knee jerk reacted to the case and now you simply cannot admit the evidence showed you were wrong.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Freak, you are stubborn to the point of insipidness as the FACTS PROVE THAT ZIMMERMAN INITIATED THE ENTIRE INCIDENT WHEN HE STARTED TAILING MARTIN, WAS DISCOVERED, TOLD NOT TO FOLLOW FURTHER, AND CONTINUED TO DO SO. His injuries were NOT as dire as he wanted all to believe....and the bottom line was Martin had a final altercation with a ARMED stranger tailing him FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN SUSPICION. Deal with it.
Click to expand...

Following someone does not give Martin the right to attack. Period. You then try to belittle the injuries because you want to pretend Martin was an innocent in the situation.

When Zimmerman was told not to follow, he stated that he had LOST Martin. MARTIN then came back and confronted Zimmerman. Martin initiated the confrontation that led to his death.

Period.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
So you admit he had been found guilty of NOTHING at that point and was indeed INNOCENT.

Yet your vigilante hero still felt the need to gun him down in cold blood.
Click to expand...

Also... please show us where the good Samaritan was found guilty by a jury of his peers of gunning someone down in cold blood.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top