Video: Anti-science leftist mob crucifies sole sane person for preferring reality

That would be transvestites.

Here is an example of a real woman looking like a man but identifies as a woman:

If that's a biological woman, that's a genetic anomaly, and frankly, she should shave if she wants to be treated as a woman.




I doubt that guy was right wing, and frankly, that did look like a dude.
 
Again, deny what? Radical Islam means they support terrorism. It means supporting beheading and such. It means supporting denying women and LGBT's rights.

Would you describe making apostasy and blasphemy illegal as radical?

As for the bolded, you can look at the state of women's rights and gay rights in most of the Islamic World to know how they feel on those things.
 
If the right is wrong about climate change, how come the projections for the climate by many of the most prominent institutions have ended up so wrong?

Scientists disagree on various things relating to climate change as they do with evolution. However, like evolution, no real scientist denies that climate change is real.
So yeah, some of them will get predictions wrong, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. It also isn't a reflection on the entire scientific community or climate change.

Also, how is Shapiro hateful about Muslims?

He lies about Muslims to make them seem like a global threat and he supports Israel and their war crimes.
 
If that's a biological woman, that's a genetic anomaly, and frankly, she should shave if she wants to be treated as a woman.

She did. She had to shave 3 to 4 times a day. It gets quite tiring so she just accepted who she is.

I doubt that guy was right wing, and frankly, that did look like a dude.

Yes, hence the danger of right-wing fearmongering.
 
Scientists disagree on various things relating to climate change as they do with evolution. However, like evolution, no real scientist denies that climate change is real.
So yeah, some of them will get predictions wrong, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. It also isn't a reflection on the entire scientific community or climate change.

The debate isn't on the change itself. It's a matter of what is the primary cause. People keep saying that it's us, but that doesn't seem accurate when figuring in all of the other factors and historical projections.

He lies about Muslims to make them seem like a global threat and he supports Israel and their war crimes.

Radical Islam is a global threat. I'm not a fan of Israel either, however.
 
Is that so? How many hermaphrodites exist?

I'll understand if you don't know.

#deflection

You don't want to say there are three genders, so now you're trying to change the subject. You're probably also going to try to say inter-sex people don't count because there are few of them. Which, of course, doesn't change anything. If you consider genitalia to be the only definer of gender, then there are three genders.
 
She did. She had to shave 3 to 4 times a day. It gets quite tiring so she just accepted who she is.

Yes, hence the danger of right-wing fearmongering.

Well, thankfully, most women don't have to deal with that. An anomaly doesn't change what reality is for most people.

It's not about fearmongering. It's about common sense.
 
Yep.



Yes I know how they are treated in those countries.

So we can agree that the majority of Muslims have some radical beliefs even if they aren't killing people left and right.

The point that the right has been making regarding many Muslims is that they don't mesh well with Western culture because of some of their beliefs. Not every Muslim fits this, but many do.
 
I believe I posted two examples, and there could be others. You wanted to see examples of left-wing indoctrination, didn't you?

So two? You're going to say that in the entire country, there were two cases of Obamaian propaganda? You sure it wasn't, dare I say, three?!

Like I said, the Unhinged Right points to a few exampled and then claims that all of academia is like this.
 
Well, thankfully, most women don't have to deal with that. An anomaly doesn't change what reality is for most people.

It's not about fearmongering. It's about common sense.

Right, right. There's common sense and there's going apeshit over something that have been occurring for years and years.
 
So we can agree that the majority of Muslims have some radical beliefs even if they aren't killing people left and right.

The point that the right has been making regarding many Muslims is that they don't mesh well with Western culture because of some of their beliefs. Not every Muslim fits this, but many do.

Plenty of Muslims fit right here in America just fine. The irony is that they embrace the Constitution more than the radical Christians.
 
Right, right. There's common sense and there's going apeshit over something that have been occurring for years and years.

I would say the only part that is "going apeshit" is getting the state involved. The state should not dictate who uses what. The market and society at large can do that.

So, no state intervention is needed. Yes, the right should stop legislating it, but so should the left.
 
I would say the only part that is "going apeshit" is getting the state involved. The state should not dictate who uses what. The market and society at large can do that.

So, no state intervention is needed. Yes, the right should stop legislating it, but so should the left.

Was it "going apeshit" when the state got involved in black people sharing the bathrooms with white people?
 
Plenty of Muslims fit right here in America just fine. The irony is that they embrace the Constitution more than the radical Christians.

The ones that believe in free speech and freedom of religion do, but those would be the "progressive" Muslims.

The average Muslim is not progressive in that sense. Granted, we do have the advantage of receiving more of the Westernized and progressive Muslims, as opposed to Europe, who seems to be getting the riff raff.
 
Was it "going apeshit" when the state got involved in black people sharing the bathrooms with white people?

No, but Jim Crow is not comparable with this. Just because someone has a mental illness, it doesn't mean the state should force everyone to enable it.

Race is a biological component, not an illness.
 
No, but Jim Crow is not comparable with this. Just because someone has a mental illness, it doesn't mean the state should force everyone to enable it.

Race is a biological component, not an illness.

That is the same argument with homosexuality.
 
If you consider genitalia to be the only definer of gender, then there are three genders.

That's what biology tells us, and hermaphrodites are perishingly rare, supposedly.

Such conditions are extremely rare in humans. In true gonadal intersex (or true hermaphroditism), an individual has both ovarian and testicular tissue. The ovarian and testicular tissue may be separate, or the two may be combined in what is called an ovotestis.

https://www.britannica.com/science/hermaphroditism
 
Back
Top