Vet add calls for banning Fox

NiftyNiblick said:
Banning Fox News is a blatant 1st Amendment violation.

I don't love the Constitution, as people who read my posts know,
but the 1st Amendment isn't one of its problems, despite half the citizenry not knowing what it means.

Not patronizing those who purchase advertising time on Fox, however, is anybody's reasonable prerogative.
Click to expand...

Fox is not news


Liars can’t be allowed to call their lies news
 
Stone said:
No you didnt. You were just being honest for a change. It was your SCUM who started calling our troops BABY KILLERS,....remember?
Click to expand...

So you believe you have the right to steal my ability to speak for myself?


Fucking Nazi fascist
 
Uncensored2008 said:
In the case of Truthmatters/evince/docdutch - there isn't much to wash....
Click to expand...

The fact you allow me to live inside your head is interesting. It's far roomier than even I would have guessed.

7haekh.jpg
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So what? VetsVote is a hyper-partisan Leftist / Progressive group that endorses a straight Democrat ticket. What would you expect?

Check it for yourself, I did.

https://votevets.org/
https://votevets.org/candidates

Their policy choices are straight Leftist / Progressive too

https://votevets.org/policy-priorities

So, a partisan hack group of vets--likely a small one given few veterans are Leftists or Progressive--whines to their favored in Congress that Fox is being mean to them or some other nonsense.
Click to expand...

Never heard of them but it's not surprising you're having a conniption over them even though the Swiftboaters and white supremacist groups having a core of veterans never seemed to bother you as much.

Why the bias, Master Chief?
 
Doc Dutch said:
Never heard of them but it's not surprising you're having a conniption over them even though the Swiftboaters and white supremacist groups having a core of veterans never seemed to bother you as much.

Why the bias, Master Chief?
Click to expand...

Who's having a "conniption?" I point out their radical political bias and nothing more. You start making comparisons to other groups along with making unsubstantiated claims about veterans in general. This seems to bother you far more than me.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Who's having a "conniption?"

I point out their radical political bias and nothing more. You start making comparisons to other groups along with making unsubstantiated claims about veterans in general.

This seems to bother you far more than me.
Click to expand...
You. As usual of late.

Nothing wrong with pointing out radical political bias. When I pointed it out about you, you had a conniption. Context is everything, Terry. You know better. Or did. The fact that you don't is why I think not all of your oars are in the water.

Unlike you, I see your pattern of behavior. The consistency in your Alt-Right bias. As mentioned previously, the RWNJs never applaud when I call Bill Clinton an adulterous, lying, draft-dodging pedophile, but if I call Trump the same thing, you and your like-minded Alt-Righties have a conniption over it, often labeling me a "Lefty" or worse. I'm curious about your bias.
 
Jarod said:
They should not be banned, free speech and all, but people need to be educated as to what they are... a propaganda and promotion machine.
Click to expand...

Aw hell. Then let’s make sure to tell everyone that they’re ALL like that. They all use the same formula: an hour or two of partisan talking heads, then 10 to 30 minutes of hard news. For instance, if I wanted to hear about a plane crash, I could watch any of the 24 hour networks, and if I wanted to find out how the commenters FELT about the plane crash, I could tune it to fox…because I don’t give a rats ass how rachel madcow “feels” about anything.
 
Callinectes said:
Aw hell. Then let’s make sure to tell everyone that they’re ALL like that. They all use the same formula: an hour or two of partisan talking heads, then 10 to 30 minutes of hard news. For instance, if I wanted to hear about a plane crash, I could watch any of the 24 hour networks, and if I wanted to find out how the commenters FELT about the plane crash, I could tune it to fox…because I don’t give a rats ass how rachel madcow “feels” about anything.
Click to expand...

I don’t know, I only saw the Fox commentators laughing at how they were lying to the runes who tuned in.
 
So you go with the station That admitted under oath that they LIE TO THEIR VIEWERS FOR MONEY AND POWER
 
Fox has said all other news was lying so don’t listen to them


Listen only to fox



Then it turns out they were lying to their viewers


Admitted it under oath in court



So that means fox also knows the other stations tell the truth



But some are so debauched they chose the admitted liars lies over truth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top