Very very very interesting. I guess what will Bee will Bee

I Love America said:
Let's be clear. This is not about racism or misogyny or any other pet cause the left claims to care about. Oh that is what they want you to believe, but they are nothing more than convenient cudgels to use against those they seek to destroy.

This is all about raw, naked politics and nothing more. It is about Roseanne being seen as "pro Trump". That is it. If she were sufficiently anti Trump people like Bourbon would be saying "What she said was unfortunate, but she misspoke". The way they are going out of their way to defend Samantha Bee, they would be doing for Roseanne.

That is what this is all about. To pretend otherwise is trading in sheer ignorance
Click to expand...

Sad how they consider something wrong based on who says it rather than what was said.
 
I Love America said:
Let's be clear. This is not about racism or misogyny or any other pet cause the left claims to care about. Oh that is what they want you to believe, but they are nothing more than convenient cudgels to use against those they seek to destroy.

This is all about raw, naked politics and nothing more. It is about Roseanne being seen as "pro Trump". That is it. If she were sufficiently anti Trump people like Bourbon would be saying "What she said was unfortunate, but she misspoke". The way they are going out of their way to defend Samantha Bee, they would be doing for Roseanne.

That is what this is all about. To pretend otherwise is trading in sheer ignorance
Click to expand...

You asked me a question, to wit: So you think that if Roseanne would have called Jarrett a "feckless cunt" the left would be silent today? N word please

My answer was: I think if Roseanne had not been racist...the people who condemn racism would not have made a fuss.

I stand by that answer.

What is your problem?
 
Frank Apisa said:
You asked me a question, to wit: So you think that if Roseanne would have called Jarrett a "feckless cunt" the left would be silent today? N word please

My answer was: I think if Roseanne had not been racist...the people who condemn racism would not have made a fuss.

I stand by that answer.

What is your problem?
Click to expand...

You're lying. You don't see that as a problem, old man? Apparently you don't see hiding like a coward as a problem either.
 
Bee was crude but not racist. That makes all the difference. She was also doing her act. Rosanne was not. So, not the same thing.
 
Frank Apisa said:
You asked me a question, to wit: So you think that if Roseanne would have called Jarrett a "feckless cunt" the left would be silent today? N word please

My answer was: I think if Roseanne had not been racist...the people who condemn racism would not have made a fuss.

I stand by that answer.

What is your problem?
Click to expand...


You are being willfully ignorant. But that is OK. I am actually very good with the lefts hypocrisy on this. I hope they double down. Truly I do
 
I Love America said:
You are being willfully ignorant. But that is OK. I am actually very good with the lefts hypocrisy on this. I hope they double down. Truly I do
Click to expand...

Nothing ignorant about what I have said at all.

Several people have said essentially the same thing.

The outrage against Roseanne was a result of the racist content.

But...apparently you cannot understand that.

Fine.

Go with your delusions.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Nothing ignorant about what I have said at all.

Several people have said essentially the same thing.

The outrage against Roseanne was a result of the racist content.

But...apparently you cannot understand that.

Fine.

Go with your delusions.
Click to expand...

I understand that alleged "racism" is the veil with which they hide behind, but their intentions run deeper. It is ok if you don't want to see it or the contradiction. You are free to live in your delusion

Have a blessed day
 
Bourbon said:
Like the one in Fucking Avatar you Idiot ... :laugh:

Look ... you guys can play your Games with yourselves ... leave me out of it.
Click to expand...

:lolup: Snowflake triggered!!! :rofl2: I love how a snowflake makes a moronic comment, then when called on it gets triggered. :rofl2:

giphy.gif
 
I didn't figure you would get it. Trump is using the power of his office to influence the NFL, ABC is worried about the money in the long run. A bit more complicated than the RW talking points, I guess.
Legion said:
Non sequitur.
Click to expand...
 
makin#2 said:
I didn't figure you would get it. Trump is using the power of his office to influence the NFL, ABC is worried about the money in the long run. A bit more complicated than the RW talking points, I guess.
Click to expand...

So you say. The First Amendment prohibits Congress from infringing on free speech by enacting laws.

Nothing wrong about using the Bully Pulpit to influence events.
 
I Love America said:
I understand that alleged "racism" is the veil with which they hide behind, but their intentions run deeper. It is ok if you don't want to see it or the contradiction. You are free to live in your delusion

Have a blessed day
Click to expand...

I guess deceiving yourselves is something you have to do.

Fine...if it gets you past the graveyard.

In the meantime, if that "opinion" you are selling is actually saying that the left has got a hard-on for the right...and will slam them at every occasion...you are on the mark.

Same thing goes for the goofuses of the right...slamming the left at every fake point available.

So what.

The reason for the uproar over Roseanne's remarks was the racist element. If you want to delude yorself that it is something else...go for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top