Militia, tardboy, militia.
Vegas Killer not qualified to fly an airplane, allowed to buy guns.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Militia, tardboy, militia.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yes, fuckstick, WE THE PEOPLE are the militia and the RIGHT belongs to WE THE PEOPLE!!!! it does NOT say the right of the militia, it says right of the people.
Collective, dimwit.
Individual, coon, individual.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
there has never been a federal court case that EVER stated it was a collective right. NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! retard.
Didn't say there was, tardboy.
When originally written (back to the originalist thing), there was a conscientious objector clause. That sure makes sense that one could opt out of an individual context, doesn't it, tardboy? That's because it was a collective right, in the context of the militia. Try to wrap that peabrain of yours around it with the concept of a compulsory national guard.
Not only are your English skills lacking, you are massively ignorant of the subject you think you know something about. Now THAT is pathetic!
When originally written (back to the originalist thing), there was a conscientious objector clause. That sure makes sense that one could opt out of an individual context, doesn't it, tardboy? That's because it was a collective right, in the context of the militia. Try to wrap that peabrain of yours around it with the concept of a compulsory national guard.
Not only are your English skills lacking, you are massively ignorant of the subject you think you know something about. Now THAT is pathetic!
Русский агент
Путин - мl
That's the fly in the liberal ointment.
They seem to think that if just pass the right law, that suddenly criminals will see the error of their ways.
I don't believe that they just want to regulate guns.
I think they want to outlaw them, which means that outlaws will have them and the law-abiding won't.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
I've like it's since the Constitution was written. That was 1787. Actually, 1791 with the Bill of Rights.
Only when it's appropriate.
Which original intent, the actual one or the one you perceive? They aren't the same thing, BOY.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Oh My God, you're such a fucking moron. the objector clause was there initially because they wanted it to be VOLUNTARY!!!!! and just when EXACTLY did the national guard come in to concept?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
it is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers would guarantee a right to the new central government regulating their arms after their old central government tried to regulate their arms.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
The objector clause was there for the membership in the MILITIA, which required possession of a firearm, was to be voluntary.
Fucking idiot.
lol
You also misinterpret the meaning of the word 'regulate' in the context of the 2nd.
What a fucking ignoramus.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!! obviously, especially since you have no fucking clue why the constitution was written, retard.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
what did 'regulate' mean when the framers wrote the 2nd Amendment? do you think they meant government controlled, given that they just had to overcome a government that wanted to regulate them???????