Vance / Rubio 2028

I promise, if that happens, I will be revisiting right there with you. It's just that I was listening to the Black History Month Reception in Washington D.C. when they erupted into "four more years! four more years! four more years! ..." I don't think American "blacks" want any Democrats in the White House. They just want Trump to stay.

So yes, we'll certainly revisit if that happens.
LOL - sure. It's just that actual facts disagree with you:

Here’s a current snapshot (early-to-mid 2026) of how Donald Trump is polling with people of color — particularly Black, Hispanic/Latino, and Asian Americans — based on recent public polling and analysis:


🧑🏾‍🤝‍🧑🏽 Black voters​


  • Trump improved his share of the Black vote in the 2024 election compared with 2020, winning about 15% of Black voters nationally — roughly double his share four years earlier, but still far below the majority.
  • Recent polls show his approval among Black Americans is low and trending downward. Some aggregated polling estimates from late 2025 indicate his approval among Black voters may have dipped into the low-teens (around 10–15%) while disapproval remains high.
  • Polling also shows Black voters remain significantly more confident in Democratic candidates on many issues.
 
LOL - sure. It's just that actual facts disagree with you:
Nope. Your delusions disagree, sure, but the Black Heritage Month Reception did erupt into a chant of "four more years! four more years! four more years! ..."

... and since I am not gullible as you are, I am not accepting stupid leftist propaganda that has been used to "train" AI assistants.

[ leftist AI training propaganda omitted]
I have zero confidence in your numbers, as should you.
 
Nope. Your delusions disagree, sure, but the Black Heritage Month Reception did erupt into a chant of "four more years! four more years! four more years! ..."

... and since I am not gullible as you are, I am not accepting stupid leftist propaganda that has been used to "train" AI assistants.


I have zero confidence in your numbers, as should you.
Hey, how's your fascist quest going to silence speech you don't like? Let's see, you tried to cancel Kimmel but that failed then you tried to say that protestors aren't allowed near ICE agents a contradiction of the 1A, then you tried to say, people can't legally carry during protests, a violation of the 2A.

So my question is this: How many more principles are you willing to compromise just to see liberals sad?
 
You know who's gullible? Anyone who doesn't realize trump's terrified about what's in the Epstein files.
Trump isn't terrified because there aren't any "Epstein Files". You are simply a terrified slave of your political party.


Question: Why don't you either :

1. post the "Epstein Files" material of which Trump is terrified, or
2. admit that no rational adult has any reasoln to believe that there is any negative information involving Trump

...?


Wait, I know, because #1 isn't acutally an option, and your lie in this case is the lie of omission described in #2. Now I get it.

Also, anyone who actually believes trump is polling well
There are no polls, thus Trump is not polling "well."
 
You know who's gullible? Anyone who doesn't realize trump's terrified about what's in the Epstein files. Also, anyone who actually believes trump is polling well with people of color right now? So foolish!
 
Have you thought about what you're going to wear at the Democratic president's inauguration in 2029? By that time the Democratic congress will have paved the way for accountability - deferring Bondi, Patel, Bongino, Bovino, Noem, Lewandowski, Miller, Wiles, and trump's cases to the DOJ for high crimes and misdemeanors. Shit - some might even get the death penalty!
 
LOL - they're both nothing but a couple of cucks for trump. That's how they'll be remembered as they're laughed off the political stage.
3ade37377fbd0e5a3c282f0daccc3274.jpg
 
Have you thought about what you're going to wear at the Democratic president's inauguration in 2029? By that time the Democratic congress will have paved the way for accountability - deferring Bondi, Patel, Bongino, Bovino, Noem, Lewandowski, Miller, Wiles, and trump's cases to the DOJ for high crimes and misdemeanors. Shit - some might even get the death penalty!
What crimes did you have in mind?
 
What crimes did you have in mind?
Oh, so many! So many crimes. I'm thinking besides the sex-trafficking - trading of government secrets, extortion, perhaps even murder, since people in Epstein's orbit keep "committing suicide" including Epstein.

This goes pretty deep. You're correct to be worried about how this will implicate trump and his goons.
 
From a purely political standpoint, the Americans would be better off with a woman as Vance's VP. Not sure who. Maybe Chaya Raichik - but I doubt she would accept the nomination.

But I would still vote for a Vance / Rubio ticket.
If the RNC is going to put a woman on the ticket, it'll be Tulsi Gabbard.

As it stands, I think Trump is grooming the Vance/Rubio ticket. I notice that Trump has Vance and Rubio both making regular high-profile international speaking engagements part of their routines, and Trump is always speaking of the pair in a way that has convinced me that he (Trump) is laying the groundwork for Vance/Rubio to be announced as the ticket.

Keep in mind that they both will run as competitors, and each will have his own respective campaign, however I believe that is part of the design. I think the Republican party will take sides, i.e. either Rubio or Vance, as their respective campaigns drive for the nomination, only to have Vance be declared the winner ... quickly announcing that Rubio will be his running mate ... and Republicans / Conservatives / MAGA will celebrate an inevitable victory.

That's what I believe is the plan. If it turns out that ends up being a Rubio/Vance ticket, everyone such as myself who "got it wrong" will still be fine with it ... except that the RNC isn't going to make Vance repeat the VP role. The Vance/Rubio ticket has both being "promoted" and positions Rubio nicely to be President.
 
From a purely political standpoint, the Americans would be better off with a woman as Vance's VP. Not sure who. Maybe Chaya Raichik - but I doubt she would accept the nomination.

But I would still vote for a Vance / Rubio ticket.
Here's a compilation of Vance being booed - BY REPUBLICANS!

No way in hell he has a chance of winning Republicans hearts and minds! he's an empty vessel being financed by a white supremacist immigrant.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kfKBO9djD0


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kfKBO9djD0


The entire world hates J.D. Vance!1771612828005.png
 
If the RNC is going to put a woman on the ticket, it'll be Tulsi Gabbard.
OMG - MOONBAT ALERT! The only one in trump's administration more insane that RFK Jr. is Gabbard!
As it stands, I think Trump is grooming the Vance/Rubio ticket. I notice that Trump has Vance and Rubio both making regular high-profile international speaking engagements part of their routines, and Trump is always speaking of the pair in a way that has convinced me that he (Trump) is laying the groundwork for Vance/Rubio to be announced as the ticket.
LOL - Vance might be fragged by his own party. Republicans hate the couch-fucker.
Keep in mind that they both will run as competitors, and each will have his own respective campaign, however I believe that is part of the design. I think the Republican party will take sides, i.e. either Rubio or Vance, as their respective campaigns drive for the nomination, only to have Vance be declared the winner ... quickly announcing that Rubio will be his running mate ... and Republicans / Conservatives / MAGA will celebrate an inevitable victory.
Marco/Vance - Two of the biggest cucks who ever lived!
 
Back
Top