I don't know what "the slut" did. You asked about Evince, who addressed a school official abusing a child on line. That's more than politics.
Utah idiot calls a child a transgender
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
I don't know what "the slut" did. You asked about Evince, who addressed a school official abusing a child on line. That's more than politics.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
The threats were all against the woman who shared someone else's post; she was the target of this campaign of which you are aiding and abetting, you dust-covered cum-bubble.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
The kid needed no defense. Nobody called her a "trans." evince is dog-piling on a campaign to destroy someone who merely shared someone else's post. He, and you, are being totally dishonest on this issue.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
No it is not. It has always been a thing since the dawn of mankind.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Sharing is caring, right?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Are you saying that sharing a false information to the public absolved her responsibility? After all sharing is caring.
The Nazis are always blaming the Jews for the genocide.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. Nobody knows the reason that post was shared. All that matters is that she didn't write it, the post didn't call anyone a trans, and the people attacking the woman who shared the post are obviously dishonest and simply having fun trying to injure the woman over nothing.
I guess this is like you're not at fault if you weren't the inventor of Covid in a lab, just coughed in someone's face when you knew you had it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Are you saying that there was false information in the first place?
Also, no, I am free to share a recipe, for example, that has some other false information, if my intention is to share a recipe. You don't know why that post was shared. Maybe it had a great example of an amazing Helvetica font. So yes, a post can absolutely be shared, even if it happens to contain false information. Did they teach you otherwise in deaf studies? Your question seems pretty stupid.
But this is all hypothetical. I'm not aware of any false information in the post to begin with.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Do you know what the post in question says?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
No I am not saying that. You are.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
No, it's not like that. Instead, it's like when you injure someone through bearing false witness. This thread aids and abets those who lie about a woman who shared a post that she did not write that did not call anyone a trans. The liars perpetrating this injurious hoax claim that the post specifically calls a girl a trans (a deliberate lie) and that the post was shared for that reason (a deliberate lie).
And the COVID hype/fear/panic was a hoax as well. It is fitting that you included it as support for this lie that you are promulgating.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
It's for you to tell me the false information in it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Incorrect. I never said there was any false information in the post. You, however, implied it to be the case: "Are you saying that sharing a false information to the public absolved her responsibility?" Your question only makes sense under the assumption that the post contained false information and that she shared the post for that reason. You lose.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Some of the comments on this thread are so coarse, and so repugnant.
We need to evolve. We need to be better.
We need to evolve. We need to be better.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You made that claim, not me. You're the one who claimed to have read it.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You are the one who said nobody said she was a trans, therefore, according to you, the post says nothing of the sort.
When did Mike Tyson start taking puberty blockers or estrogen?
Your argument is silly since it is about something that could never happen since it doesn't work the way you portray it.