USA must stop using violence!

Better yet, build shacks behind the house and have the 'employees' live there. Whip them if they try to get a better job. Ahhh Liberty's dream of the Old South.

One of the best things about the Old South was that there were no Unions.

Unions in bed with Marxist politicians.

We still have the sign out on the border.

Enjoy your open borders Crashk.
 
I would agree they have gone too far. But not all jobs sent overseas are due to union costs. Multinationals don't want to pay a livable wage for people living in the western world. Our cost of living is highly inflated too, as the corporations raise prices here to subsidize the prices in poorer countries.

I think unions are more responsible than you think.
 
I have and I haven't seen or heard anything about people TRYING to shoot anyone who crosses into the US.

Once again, could you please provide something that supports your assertion?

I heard it on the radio earlier today, and once on Fox News this morning. I wish I could offer you a link. Try looking on the Fox web site. They may have it.
 
I heard it on the radio earlier today, and once on Fox News this morning. I wish I could offer you a link. Try looking on the Fox web site. They may have it.

If it was on Fox news or on the radio, you should be able to find the broadcast on their sites and provide said link.
Otherwise; it appears that you're just trying to stir things up, by making comments designed to inflame.
 
If it was on Fox news or on the radio, you should be able to find the broadcast on their sites and provide said link.
Otherwise; it appears that you're just trying to stir things up, by making comments designed to inflame.

No dude. Really I'm not trying to inflame anyone.

Crap. Let me take the time to find it.
 

Your links both go to the same article; that was written by the same person, on the same day.
They both reference a comment that was made by one person, who was referring to drug smugglers.

Back to your original comment, you posted:

"If you want to spark an international incident, just go to the southern border, and start shooting people coming here. That will surely gain some attention.

You could join the skin heads that are already trying to do this."


Did you intentionally leave off the entire comment made, in an attempt to just stir up emotions??
 
Your links both go to the same article; that was written by the same person, on the same day.
They both reference a comment that was made by one person, who was referring to drug smugglers.

Back to your original comment, you posted:

"If you want to spark an international incident, just go to the southern border, and start shooting people coming here. That will surely gain some attention.

You could join the skin heads that are already trying to do this."


Did you intentionally leave off the entire comment made, in an attempt to just stir up emotions??

What am I missing here.

I have to go for a while, but could you tell me what I said that seems to mean something other than what I ment to say? Or,,, what is it that you don't understand?

Do you think this could cause an international incident? I do. It's possible.
 
What am I missing here.

I have to go for a while, but could you tell me what I said that seems to mean something other than what I ment to say? Or,,, what is it that you don't understand?

Do you think this could cause an international incident? I do. It's possible.

Why did you ignore and fail to include the entire situation, regarding your comment of people shooting those who come across the border??
 
Back
Top